Queering CEDAW? Sexual orientation, gender identity and expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) in international human rights law

Primary Sources

Treaties and Conventions

• Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, opened for signature 10 December 1984, 1465 UNTS 85 (entered into force 26 June 1987) (CAT).
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, opened for signature 18 December 1979, 1249 UNTS 13 (entered into force 3 September 1981) (CEDAW).
   Google Scholar
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976) (ICCPR).
   Google Scholar
• Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women 1979, 6 October 1999, 2131 UNTS 83 (entered into force 22 December 2000) (OP CEDAW).
   Google Scholar
• (First) Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976) (OP ICCPR).
   Google Scholar
• Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 18 December 2002, 2375 UNTS 237 (entered into force 22 June 2006) (OP CAT).
   Google Scholar

Cases

• Advisory Opinion OC-24/17 Requested by the Republic of Costa Rica (Inter – American Court of Human Rights, 24 November 2017), available at http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_24_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Committee Against Torture, App No 573/2013, UN Doc CAT/C/60/D/573/2013 (23 June 2017) (‘DC and DE v Georgia’).
   Google Scholar
• Committee Against Torture, Communication No 562/2013, UN Doc CAT/C/56/D/562/2013 (23 November 2015) (‘JK v Canada’).
   Google Scholar
• Committee Against Torture, Communication No 338/2008, UN Doc CAT/C/46/D/338/2008 (23 May 2011) (‘Uttam Mondal v Sweden’).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Communication No 19/2017, UN Doc CEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017 (27 March 2020) (‘ON and DP v Russian Federation’).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of the Child, Communication No 51/2018, UN Doc CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 (5 February 2021) (‘AB v Finland’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 061/1979, UN Doc CCPR/C/15/D/61/1979 (2 April 1982) (‘Hertzberg v Finland’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 1361/2005, UN Doc CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 (14 May 2007) (‘X v Colombia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 1873/2009, UN Doc CCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009, (25 October 2013) (‘Alekseev v Russia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 1932/2010, UN Doc CCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010 (19 November 2012) (‘Fedotova v Russia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 2172/2012, UN Doc CCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012 (2 December 2011) (‘G v Australia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 2216/2012, UN Doc CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 (1 November 2017) (‘C v Australia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 2318/2013, UN Doc CCPR/C/123/D/2318/2013 (17 July 2018) (‘Nepomnyaschiu v Russia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 488/1992, UN Doc CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 (4 April 1994) (‘Toonen v Australia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 902/1999, UN Doc CCPR/ C/75/D/902/1999 (30 July 2002) (‘Joslin v New Zealand’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 941/2000, UN Doc CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 (18 September 2003) (‘Young v Australia’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 1833/2008, UN Doc CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 (1 November 2011) (‘X v Sweden’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 2149/2012, UN Doc CCPR/C/108/D/2149/2012 (25 July 2013) (‘MI v Sweden’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 2092/2011, UN Doc CCPR/C/116/D/2092/2011 (30 March 2016) (‘Androsenko v Belarus’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 2462/2014, UN Doc CCPR/C/117/D/2462/2014 (12 July 2016) (‘MKH v Denmark’).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Communication No 1833/2008, UN Doc CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 (1 November 2011) (‘A v Sweden’).
   Google Scholar
• Bayev and others v Russia, App No 67667/09 [2017] ECHR.
   Google Scholar
• Dudgeon v UK App No 7525/76 [1981] ECHR 5.
   Google Scholar
• Modinos v Cyprus App No 15070/89 [1993] 16 EHRR 485.
   Google Scholar
• Norris v Ireland App no 10581/83 [1988] ECHR 22.
   Google Scholar

UN Documents

• Committee Against Torture, General Comment 2: Implementation of Article 2 by States Parties, UN Doc CAT/C/GC/2 (24 January 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Committee Against Torture, General Comment 3: Implementation of Article 14 by States Parties, UN Doc CAT/C/GC/3 (13 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Committee Against Torture, General Comment No 4 (2017) on the Implementation of Article 3 of the Convention in the Context of Article 22, UN Doc CAT/C/GC/4 (4 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Article 12 of the Covenant) UN Doc E/C.12/2000/4 (11 August 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No 16: The Equal Right of Men and Women to the Enjoyment of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Article 3 of the Covenant) UN Doc E/C.12/2005/4 (11 August 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 20: Non-Discrimination in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Article 12, Para 2 of the Covenant) UN Doc E/C.12/GC/20 (2 July 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Inquiry Concerning the UK and Northern Ireland under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, UN Doc CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 (6 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Inquiry Concerning Kyrgyzstan Under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, UN Doc CEDAW/C/OP.8/KGZ/1 (21 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Inquiry Concerning Mali Under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women, UN Doc CEDAW/C/OP.8/MLI/1 (14 August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Report of the Inquiry Concerning Canada of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, UN Doc CEDAW/C/OP.8/CAN/1 (30 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Report on Mexico produced by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention, and Reply from the Government of Mexico UN Doc CEDAW/C/2005/OP.8/MEXICO (27 January 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Concluding Observations on Singapore, UN Doc CEDAW/C/SGP/CO/4 (10 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation No 27 on Older Women and the Protection of Human Rights, UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/27 (16 December 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation No 28 on Core Obligations of States Parties under Article 2, UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/28 (16 December 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation 30 on conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/30 (18 October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation 32 on gender-related dimensions of refugee status, asylum, nationality and statelessness of women, UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/32 (14 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation No 33 on Women’s Access to Justice, UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/33 (3 August 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation 34 on the rights of rural women, UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/34 (7 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation No 35 on gender-based violence against women, updating General Recommendation 19, UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/35 (26 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation 37 on the gender-related dimensions of disaster risk reduction in the context of climate change, UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/37 (2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, General Comment 37 on the Right of Peaceful Assembly (Article 21), UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/37 (27 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 26: Article 6 (Right to life), UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/36 (3 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 35: Article 9 (Liberty and Security of the Person), UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/35 (16 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on Cameroon, UN Doc CCPR/C/CMR/CO/4/2010 (4 August 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on Honduras, UN Doc CCPR/C/HND/CO/1/2006 (13 December 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council, Independent Expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, UN Doc A/HRC/RES/32/2 (30 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Report of Independent Expert on Protection Against Violence and Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, UN Doc A/72/172 (19 July 2017).
   Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Monographs and Edited Collections

• Janet Halley (2006) Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism, Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janet Halley et al (2018) Governance Feminism: An Introduction, University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janet Halley et al (eds) (2019) Feminism: Notes from the Field, University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• John C Hawley (ed) (2001) Post-Colonial, Queer, SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gina Heathcote (2019) Feminist Dialogues on International Law: Successes, Tensions, and Failures, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Annemarie Jagose (1997) Queer Theory: An Introduction, Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratna Kapur (2005) Erotic Justice and the New Politics of Colonialism, Glasshouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahul Rao (2020) Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damien Gonzalez Salzberg (2019) Sexuality and Transsexuality under the European Convention on Human Rights: A Queer Reading of Human Rights Law, Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Hsien Li Tan (2011) The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar

Articles and Book Chapters

• Saida Ali et al (2015) ‘Advocating for Sexual Rights at the UN: The Unfinished Business of Global Development’ 23 Reproductive Health Matters 31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreya Atrey (2018) ‘Women’s Human Rights: From Progress to Transformation, An Intersectional Response to Martha Nussbaum’ 40 Human Rights Quarterly 859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Baisley (2016) ‘Reaching the Tipping Point? Emerging International Human Rights Norms pertaining to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity’ 38 Human Rights Quarterly 134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas Bamforth (2010) ‘An Imperial Strategy? The Use of Comparative and International Law in Arguments about LGBT Rights’ in Robert Leckey & Kim Brooks (eds) Queer Theory: Law, Culture and Empire, Routledge, 157.
   Google Scholar
• Doris Buss and Blair Rutherford (2017) ‘Dangerous Desires: Illegality, Sexuality, and the Global Governance of Artisanal Mining’ in Dianne Otto (ed) Queering International Law, Routledge, 35.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Byrnes (1989) ‘The “Other” Human Rights Treaty Body: The Work of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women’ 14 Yale Journal of International Law 1.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Byrnes (2020a) ‘The Committee against Torture and the Subcommittee for the Prevention of Torture’ in Frédéric Mégret & Philip Alston (eds) The United Nations and Human Rights A Critical Appraisal, Oxford University Press, 477.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Byrnes (2020b) ‘The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women’ in Frédéric Mégret & Philip Alston (eds) The United Nations and Human Rights a Critical Appraisal, Oxford University Press, 393.
   Google Scholar
• Meghan Campbell (2015) ‘CEDAW and Women’s Intersecting Identities: a Pioneering New Approach to Intersectional Discrimination’ Revista Direito GV 479.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan Carpenter (2020) ‘Intersex Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Sex Characteristics and the Yogyakarta Principles Plus 10’ Culture Health & Sexuality doi:10.1080/13691058.2020.1781262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julia A Ernst (2012) ‘Review Essay: The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: A Commentary’ 13 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1.
   Google Scholar
• Timothy Garvey (2010) ‘“God v Gays?” The Rights of Sexual Minorities in International Law as seen through the Doomed Existence of the Brazilian Resolution’ 38 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 659.
   Google Scholar
• Michael P Goodyear (2021) ‘Going Global: An International Human Rights Approach to Russian LGBTQ+ Law and Practices’ 61 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (forthcoming Spring 2021) available on SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3647502.
   Google Scholar
• Aeyal M Gross (2008) ‘Sex, Love and Marriage: Questioning Gender and Sexuality Rights in International Law’ 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 235.
   Google Scholar
• Aeyal Gross (2017) ‘Homoglobalism: The Emergence of Global Gay Governance’ in Dianne Otto (ed) Queering International Law, Routledge, 148.
   Google Scholar
• Janet Halley et al (2006) ‘From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostitution/Sex Work and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism’ 29 Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 335.
   Google Scholar
• Vanja Hamzic (2011) ‘The Case of Queer Muslims: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in International Human Rights Law and Muslim Legal and Social Ethos’ 11 Human Rights Law Review 237.
   Google Scholar
• Lucovic Hennebel (2020) ‘The Human Rights Committee’ in Frédéric Mégret & Philip Alston (eds) The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal, Oxford University Press, 339.
   Google Scholar
• B. Hernandez-Truyol (2011) ‘Unsex CEDAW? No! Super-Sex It!’ 20 Colombia Journal of Gender and Law 195.
   Google Scholar
• Rikki Holtmaat and Paul Post (2015) ‘Enhancing LGBTI Rights by Changing the Interpretation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women?’ 33 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimaraoke Izugbara et al (2020) ‘Regional Legal and Policy Instruments for Addressing LGBT Exclusion in Africa’ 28 Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratna Kapur (2017) ‘The (Im)possibility of Queering International Human Rights Law’ in Dianne Otto (ed) Queering International Law: Complicities, Possibilities, Alliances, Risks, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Kirby (2011) ‘The Sodomy Offence: England’s Least Lovely Legal Export?’ 1 Journal of Commonwealth Criminal Law 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Morgan (1993) ‘Sexuality and Human Rights: The First Communication by an Australian to the Human Rights Committee under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’ 14 Australian Yearbook of International Law 277.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Morgan (1994a) ‘Identifying Evil for What it is: Tasmania, Sexual Perversity and the United Nations’ 19 Melbourne University Law Review 740.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Morgan (1994b) ‘Protecting Human Rights or Just Passing the Buck?’ The Human Rights (Sexual Conduct) Bill 1994’ 1 Australian Journal of Human Rights 409.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Morgan (1995) ‘Queer Law: Identity, Culture, Diversity, Law’ 5 Australasian Gay and Lesbian Law Journal 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Morgan (2000) ‘Queering International Human Rights Law’ in Carl Stychin & Didi Herman (eds) Law and Sexuality, University of Minnesota Press, 208.
   Google Scholar
• Martha C Nussbaum (2016) ‘Women’s Progress and Women’s Human Rights’ 38 Human Rights Quarterly 589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael O’Flaherty (2015) ‘The Yogyakarta Principles at Ten’ 33 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianne Otto (2012) ‘Women’s Rights’ in Daniel Moeckli et al (eds) International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, 316.
   Google Scholar
• Dianne Otto (2015) ‘Queering Gender [Identity] in International Law’ 33 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianne Otto (2017) ‘Introduction: Embracing Queer Curiosity’ in Dianne Otto (ed) Queering International Law: Complicities, Possibilities, Alliances, Risks, Routledge, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rahul Rao (2017) ‘A Tale of Two Atonements’ in Dianne Otto (ed) Queering International Law, Routledge, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Darren Rosenblum (2011) ‘Unsex CEDAW, or What’s Wrong with Women’s Rights’ 20 Columbia Journal of Gender & Law 98.
   Google Scholar
• Gayle S Rubin (1984) ‘Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality’ in Carole S Vance (ed) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 143.
   Google Scholar
• Monika Zalnieriute (2017) ‘The Anatomy of Neoliberal Internet Governance: A Queer Critical Political Economy Perspective’ in Dianne Otto (ed) Queering International Law, Routledge, 54.
   Google Scholar

Reports and websites

• Heather Cassell (2020) ‘Anti-Bias Group Decides in Favour of Russian Lesbian Couple’ Bay Area Reporter, 20 June 2020 https://www.ebar.com/news/news//293343.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights ‘Fact Sheet: Issues of Sexual Orientation’ July 2020, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Sexual_orientation_ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, ‘Advances and Challenges Towards the Recognition of the Rights of LGBTI Persons in the Americas’, http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/LGBTI-RecognitionRights2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ILGA (International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Trans and Intersex Association) (2019a) ‘UN Treaty Bodies Strategic Litigation Toolkit- Part 1 Policy Paper’, Geneva, ILGA World https://ilga.org/downloads/Treaty_Bodies_Strategic_Litigation_toolkit_policy_paper_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ILGA (2019b) ‘Treaty Bodies Strategic Litigation Toolkit - Part 4 Table of Treaty Bodies’ SOGIESC decisions and pending cases’ Geneva, ILGA World https://ilga.org/Treaty-Bodies-jurisprudence-SOGIESC.
   Google Scholar
• Bridget Sleap et al (2020) Time for a UN Convention on the Rights of Older People’ https://www.age-platform.eu/sites/default/files/Discussion_Paper_COVID-19_Time_for_a_UN_Convention-Aug2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR a), ‘Ratification of 18 Human Rights Treaties’ https://indicators.ohchr.org.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR b), ‘Table of Registered Cases’ https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CCPR/Pages/TableRegisteredCases.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• The Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (2006) (the Yogyakarta Principles) https://yogyakartaprinciples.org.
   Google Scholar
• The Yogyakarta Principles +10 Additional Principles and State Obligations on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics to complement the Yogyakarta Principles (2017). http://yogyakartaprinciples.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/A5_yogyakartaWEB-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar