Recognising personhood: the evolving relationship between the legal person and the state

References

• Primary sources
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2515 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 May 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 (New Zealand)
   Google Scholar
• Secondary sources
   Google Scholar
• Anna Arstein-Kerslake (2017) Restoring Voice to People with Cognitive Disabilities: Realizing the Right to Equal Representation Before the Law, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anna Arstein-Kerslake (2021) Legal Capacity & Gender: Realising the Human Right to Legal Personhood and Agency of Women, Disabled Women, and Gender Minorities, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anna Arstein-Kerslake et al. (2021) ‘Relational Personhood: A Conception of Legal Personhood with Insights from Disability Rights and Environmental Law’ 30(3) Griffith Law Review: online first.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David R Boyd (2017) The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World, ECW Press.
   Google Scholar
• David R Boyd (2018) ‘Recognizing the Rights of Nature: Lofty Rhetoric or Legal Revolution?’ 32 Natural Resources and Environment 13.
   Google Scholar
• Cristy Clark, et al. (2018) ‘Can You Hear the Rivers Sing? Legal Personhood, Ontology, and the Nitty-Gritty of Governance’ 45 Ecology Law Quarterly 787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clíona de Bhailís and Eilionoir Flynn (2017) ‘Recognising legal capacity: commentary and analysis of Article 12 CRPD’ 13(1) International Journal of Law in Context 6–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Flynn and A. Arstein-Kerslake (2014) ‘Legislating personhood: Realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity’ 10(1) International Journal of Law in Context 81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Geddis and Jacinta Ruru (2020) ‘Places as Persons: Creating a New Framework for Māori-Crown Relations’ in Jason NE Varuhas & Shona Wilson Stark (eds) The Frontiers of Public Law, Hart Publishing, pp. 255–274.
   Google Scholar
• Joshua C Gellers (2020) Rights for Robots: Artificial Intelligence, Animal and Environmental Law, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anna Grear (2013) ‘Law's Entities: Complexity, Plasticity and Justice’ 4 Jurisprudence 76.
   Google Scholar
• Eva Kitta (2005) ‘At the Margins of Moral Personhood’ 116(1) Ethics 100–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis J Kotzé (2017) ‘Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene’ in Louis J. Kotzé (eds) Environmental Law and Governance for the Anthropocene, Hart Publishing, pp. 189–218.
   Google Scholar
• Visa AJ Kurki (2019) A Theory of Legal Personhood, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visa AJ Kurki and Tomasz Pietrzykowski2017 in Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Macpherson and Felipe Clavijo Ospina (2018) ‘The Pluralism of River Rights in Aotearoa New Zealand and Colombia’ 25 Journal of Water Law 283.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Macpherson, Julia Torres Ventura and Felipe Clavijo Ospina (2020) ‘Constitutional Law, Ecosystems and Indigenous Peoples in Colombia: Biocultural Rights and Legal Subjects’ 9 Transnational Environmental Law 521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Macpherson et al (2021) ‘Where Ordinary Laws Fall Short: ‘Riverine Rights’ and Constitutionalism’ 30(3) Griffith Law Review: online first.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachael Mortiaux (2021) ‘Righting Aotearoa’s Coastal Marine Area: A Case for Legal Personhood to Enhance Environmental Protection’ 30(3) Griffith Law Review: online first.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngaire Naffine (2003) ‘Who Are Law’s Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects’ 66 Modern Law Review 346.
   Google Scholar
• Ngaire Naffine (2009) Law's Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Erin O'Donnell (2018) Legal Rights for Rivers: Competition, Collaboration and Water Governance, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erin O'Donnell et al (2019) ‘Recognising Personhood: An Examination of the Evolving Relationship between the Legal Person and the State’, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Erin O'Donnell, et al. (2020) ‘Stop Burying the Lede: The Essential Role of Indigenous Law(s) in Creating Rights for Nature’ 9 Transnational Environmental Law 403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, Anna Arstein-Kerslake, Philippa Duell-Piening, Siane Richardson, Ashleigh Best and Jade Roberts (2019) Recognising Personhood: an Examination of the Evolving Relationship between the Legal Person and the State. Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Jade-Ann Reeves and Timothy Peters (2021) ‘Responding to Anthropocentrism with Anthropocentrism: The Biopolitics of Environmental Personhood’ 30(3) Griffith Law Review: online first.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martuwarra RiverOfLife, et al. (2020) ‘Recognizing the Martuwarra’s First Law Right to Life as a Living Ancestral Being’ 9 Transnational Environmental Law 541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martuwarra RiverOfLife et al (2021) ‘Yoongoorrookoo: The Emergence of Ancestral Personhood’ 30(3) Griffith Law Review, in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martha Nussbaum (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John Rawls (1993) Political Liberalism, Columbia Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacinta Ruru (2019) ‘Who Are Your Waters?’, E-Flux Architecture Liquid Utility https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/liquid-utility/259674/who-are-your-waters/.
   Google Scholar
• S.M. Solaiman (2017) ‘Legal Personality of Robots, Corporations, Idols and Chimpanzees: A Quest for Legitimacy’ 25 Artificial Intelligence and Law 155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher D Stone (1972) ‘Should Trees Have Standing? Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects’ 45 Southern California Law Review 450.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvia Isako Wong (2007) ‘The Moral Personhood of Individuals Labeled ‘Mentally Retarded”: A Rawlsian Response to Nussbaum’ 33(4) Social Theory and Practice 579–594.
   Google Scholar
• Joanne Watson, Erin Wilson and Nick Hagiliassis (2017) ‘Supporting End of Life Decision Making: Case Studies of Relational Closeness in Supported Decision Making for People with Severe or Profound Intellectual Disability’ 30 Journal of Applied Research on Intellectual Disabilities 1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanessa Watts (2013) ‘Indigenous Place-Thought and Agency amongst Humans and Non-Humans (First Woman and Sky Woman Go on a European World Tour!)’ 2 Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society 20.
   Google Scholar
• Michelle Worthington and Peta Spender (2021) ‘Constructing Legal Personhood: Corporate Law’s Legacy’ 30(3) Griffith Law Review: online first.
   Google Scholar