652
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Safety first: analysing the problematisation of drones

ORCID Icon

References

Primary Legal Sources

  • Air Navigation (Aircraft Noise) Regulations 2018 (Cth).
  • Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth).
  • Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Remotely Piloted Aircraft Operation over Approved Area of Canberra (Wing Aviation) Instrument 2023 (CASA EX78/23, 31 July 2023).
  • Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (Cth).
  • Civil Aviation Legislation Amendment (Part 101) Regulation 2016 (Cth).
  • Work Health Authority v Outback Ballooning Pty Ltd (2019) HCA 2.

Secondary Legal Sources

  • ACT Government (2019) Submission No 083 to Standing Committee on Economic Development and Tourism, ACT Parliament, Inquiry into Drone Delivery Systems in the ACT (27 February 2019).
  • Rachel Adams (2017) ‘Michel Foucault: Discourse’, <https://criticallegalthinking.com/2017/11/17/michel-foucault-discourse/.
  • Riham Altawy and Amr M. Youssef (2017) ‘Security, Privacy, and Safety Aspects of Civilian Drones: A Survey’ 1(2) ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems 1.
  • The Australian Association for Uncrewed Systems (2023) Submission No 060 to Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Australian Government, National Robotics Strategy Discussion Paper (7 May 2023).
  • Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2020) Aviation Occurrence Statistics 2010 to 2019, Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Australian Government.
  • Burchan Aydin (2019) ‘Public Acceptance of Drones: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice’ 59 Technology in Society 101180.
  • Carol Bacchi (2009) Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?, Pearson.
  • Carol Bacchi (2012) ‘Introducing the ‘What’s the Problem Represented to Be?’ Approach’ in Angelique Bletsas & Chris Beasley (eds) Engaging with Carol Bacchi Strategic Interventions and Exchanges, The University of Adelaide Press.
  • Carol Bacchi (2015) ‘The Turn to Problematization: Political Implications of Contrasting Interpretive and Poststructural Adaptations’ 5(1) Open Journal of Political Science 1.
  • Carol Bacchi and Susan Goodwin (2016) Poststructural Policy Analysis: A Guide to Practice, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ron Bartsch (2018) Aviation Law in Australia, 5th ed, Thomson Reuters.
  • Ron Bartsch, James Coyne and Katherine Gray (2016) Drones in Society: Exploring the Strange New World of Unmanned Aircraft, Taylor & Francis.
  • Bonython Against Drones Action Group (2022), Report of the Trial of Delivery Drones in Bonython, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia 2018-2019.
  • Stephanie Booker (2019) ‘Drone Regulation in the ACT’ 34(5) Australian Environment Review 93.
  • Philip Boucher (2016) ‘You Wouldn’t have Your Granny Using Them’: Drawing Boundaries Between Acceptable and Unacceptable Applications of Civil Drones’ 22 Science and Engineering Ethics, 1391.
  • Julie Brown, Tom Young and Tammy Tang (2019) ‘Keeping Up with the Game of Drones: New Australian Registration and Accreditation Scheme’, <https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en-ug/knowledge/publications/2d1eac42/keeping-up-with-the-game-of-drones-new-registration-and-accreditation-scheme.
  • Des Butler (2019) ‘Drones and Invasions of Privacy: An International Comparison of Legal Responses’ 42(3) UNSW Law Journal 1039.
  • Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2016) Submission No 17 to The Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee, Parliament of Australia, Regulatory requirements that impact on the safe use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems, Unmanned Aerial Systems and associated systems (13 December 2016).
  • Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2019) Submission No 118 to Standing Committee on Economic Development and Tourism, ACT Parliament, Inquiry into Drone Delivery Systems in the ACT (27 February 2019).
  • Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2022a) ‘The RPAS and AAM Regulatory Roadmap, Commonwealth of Australia 2022’.
  • Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2022b) ‘Safety Management Systems for Aviation: A Practical Guide, SMS 1: Safety management system basics, 3rd Edition’.
  • Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2022c) Advisory Circular AC 11-02 v4.0: Exemptions Against the CASR, CAR and CAO and MOS.
  • Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2023) ‘Part 101 Micro and Excluded Remotely Piloted Aircraft Operations, Plain English Guide, Version 2.0’.
  • Roger Clarke (2014) ‘The Regulation of Civilian Drones’ Impacts on Behavioural Privacy’ 30 Computer Law & Security Review 286.
  • Roger Clarke and Lydia Bennett Moses (2014) ‘The Regulation of Civilian Drones’ Impacts on Public Safety’ 30 Computer Law & Security Review 263.
  • Reece A. Clothier, Neale L. Fulton and Rodney A. Walker (2008) ‘Pilotless Aircraft: The Horseless Carriage of the Twenty-First Century?’ 11(8) Journal of Risk Research 999.
  • Reece A. Clothier, Dominique A. Greer, Duncan G. Greer and Amisha M. Mehta (2015) ‘Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones’ 35(6) Risk Analysis 1167.
  • Julie E. Cohen (2018) ‘Technology, Political Economy, And the Role(s) of Law’, <https://lpeproject.org/blog/technology-political-economy-and-the-roles-of-law/.
  • Commonwealth Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications (2021) National Emerging Aviation Technologies Policy Statement, Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Haomiao Du and Michiel A. Heldeweg (2019) ‘An Experimental Approach to Regulating Non-Military Unmanned Aircraft Systems’ 33(3) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 285.
  • Explanatory Statement, Civil Aviation Safety Amendment (Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Modal Aircraft – Registration and Accreditation) Act 2019 (Cth).
  • Fernando Fiallos (2016) ‘The Applicability of the Public International Air Law Regime to the Operation of UAS’ in Benjamyn I. Scott (eds) The Law of Unmanned Aircraft Systems: An Introduction to the Current and Future Regulation under National, Regional and International Law, Wolters Kluwer.
  • Michel Foucault (1983) ‘Discourse & Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia’, <https://foucault.info/parrhesia/foucault.DT6.conclusion.en/.
  • Abigail R. Hall and Christopher J. Coyne (2014) ‘The Political Economy of Drones’ 25(5) Defence and Peace Economics 445.
  • David Hodgkinson and Rebecca Johnston (2018) Aviation Law and Drones: Unmanned Aircraft and the Future of Aviation, Routledge.
  • House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs (2014) Eyes in the Sky: Inquiry into Drones and the Regulation of Air Safety and Privacy, Parliament of Australia.
  • International Civil Aviation Organisation (2011) ‘Circular 328 AN/190: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)’.
  • International Civil Aviation Organisation (2018) ‘Safety Management Manual’, ICAO Doc 9859, 4th edition.
  • Robin Kellermann and Liliann Fischer (2020) ‘Drones for Parcel and Passenger Transport: A Qualitative Exploration of Public Acceptance’ 10(2) Sociología y Tecnociencia 106.
  • Francisco Klauser and Silvana Pedrozo (2017) ‘Big Data from the Sky: Popular Perceptions of Private Drones in Switzerland’ 72 Geogr. Helv 231.
  • Andy Miah (2020) Drones: The Brilliant, the Bad and the Beautiful, Emerald.
  • Minderoo Tech & Policy Lab, UWA Law School (2020) Submission No 40 to Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts, Australian Government, National Aviation Policy Issues Paper on Emerging Aviation Technologies (31 October 2020).
  • Matthew Mo and Katarina Bonatakis (2022) ‘Approaching Wildlife with Drones: Using Scientific Literature to Identify Factors to Consider for Minimising Disturbance’ 42(1) Australian Zoologist 1.
  • Chris Morrison et al (2021) ‘Regulatory overview’ in Anthony A. Tarr et al (eds) Drone law and Policy: Global Development, Risks, Regulation and Insurance, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Jiyoon Park, Solhee Kim and Kyo Suh (2018) ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Drone-Based Delivery Services in Urban and Rural Areas’ 10 Sustainability 888.
  • Julia Powles and Hannah Smith (2022) ‘When It comes to Delivery Drones, the Government is Selling Us a Pipe Dream. Experts Explain the Real Costs’, https://theconversation.com/when-it-comes-to-delivery-drones-the-government-is-selling-us-a-pipe-dream-experts-explain-the-real-costs-195361.
  • Lisa M. PytlikZillig, et al. (2018) ‘A Drone by Any Other Name: Purposes, End-User Trustworthiness, and Framing, but Not Terminology, Affect Public Support for Drones’ 37(1) IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 80.
  • Queensland Government (2018) Queensland Drones Strategy, State of Queensland.
  • Adam Rothstein (2015) Drone, Bloomsbury.
  • The Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee (2018) Regulatory requirements that impact on the safe use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems, Unmanned Aerial Systems and associated systems, Parliament of Australia.
  • Pam Stewart (2016) ‘Drone Danger: Remedies for Damage by Civilian Remotely Piloted Aircraft to Persons or Property on the Ground in Australia’ 23(30) Torts Law Journal 1.
  • Susan Strega (2015) ‘The View from the Poststructural Margins: Epistemology and Methodology Reconsidered’ in L. Brown & S. Strega (eds) Research as Resistance: Revisiting critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches, Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  • Anthony A. Tarr, et al. (2021) Drone law and policy: Global development, risks, regulation and insurance, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • UWA Minderoo Tech & Policy Lab (2022) Submission No 88 to ‘Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts, Infrastructure Planning Guidelines for Drone Delivery Services – Public Consultation Draft, (2 December 2022).
  • Victoria State Government (2022) Advanced Air Mobility in Victoria: Economic Growth through Efficient Zero-Emission Transport and Supply Chain Networks, Industry Vision Statement, State of Victoria.
  • Prue Vines, et al. (2022) ‘Predicting Bearing Fault in the Drone Freight Industry: Legal Liability in Australia’ 87(2) Journal of Air Law and Commerce 299.
  • Kevin Weller (2020) ‘Towards the Commercial Drone – From Projected Weapons Back to the Hobbyist's Shed’ 26(4) Space and Culture 656.
  • Western Australia Police Force (2018) Submission No 31 to Joint Standing Committee on Law Enforcement, Parliament of Australia, The Impact of New and Emerging Information and Communication Technology (21 March 2018).