Wallas’ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More Than Meets the Eye?

REFERENCES

• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Baldacchino, L., Ucbasaran, D., Lockett, A., & Cabantous, L. (2014). Capturing intuition through concurrent protocol analysis. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of research methods on intuition (pp. 160–175). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 72–110. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahan, D. (1995). Hermann von Helmholtz: Science and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 391–404. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2012). A psychological taxonomy of organizational innovation: Resolving the paradoxes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 29–40. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.649234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). A systems perspective on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Sawyer, K. (1995). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 329–363). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision-making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33–54. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23463682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2009). Conceptualizing and measuring intuition: A review of recent trends. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 85(7–8) (Vol. 24, pp. 1–40). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dewett, T. (2003). Understanding the relationship between information technology and creativity in organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 167–182. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848. doi:10.1037/a0019749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 135–146. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirac, P. A. M. (1963). The evolution of the physicist's picture of nature. Scientific American, 208, 45–53. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0563-45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, R. A., Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2002). The use of environmental clues during incubation. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 287–304. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1434_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, C. L. (1998). The writer tells: The creative process in the writing of literary fiction. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 29–37. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, B. D., Galton, H. C., Morgan, R., Evans, D., Oliver, C., Meyer, M., … Dalgleish, T. (2010). Listening to your heart: How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychological Science, 21, 1835–1844. doi:10.1177/0956797610389191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, S., Pallier, G., Snyder, A., & Gallate, J. (2009). The incubation effect: Hatching a solution? Creativity Research Journal, 21, 6–14. doi:10.1080/10400410802633368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp. 115–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fryer, F. (2012). Some key issues in creativity research and evaluation as seen from a psychological perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 21–28. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.649236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the “neurds”: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 1–13. doi:10.1080/10400410903579494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabora, L., & Ranjan, A. (2013). How insight emerges in a distributed, content addressable memory. In O. Vartanian A. S. Bristol, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.). Neuroscience of creativity (pp. 19–43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallate, J., Wong, C., Ellwood, S., Roring, R. W., & Snyder, A. (2012). Creative people use non-conscious processes to their advantage. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 146–151. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiselin, B. (1952–1984) The creative process: Reflections on invention in the arts and sciences (pp. 22–31). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Unpacking intuition: A process and outcome framework. Review of General Psychology, 15, 304–316. doi:10.1037/a0025069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E. (1995). Insight and affect in the history of science. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, D., & Runco, M. A. (2006). Could creativity be associated with insomnia? Creativity Research Journal, 18, 39–43. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2011). Investigating intuition: beyond self-report. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research (pp. 52–57). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, R. (2007). The relationship between creativity and intelligence: A combined yogic-scientific approach. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 179–202. doi:10.1080/10400410701397230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, R. (2009). The neuropsychological connection between creativity and meditation. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 199–222. doi:10.1080/10400410902858691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, J. S., & Hu, M. L. (2008). The mystery in the kitchen: Culinary creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 221–230. doi:10.1080/10400410802060166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, J. S., & Hu, M. L. (2009). The creative culinary process: Constructing and extending a four-component model. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 376–383. doi:10.1080/10400410903297956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P. A., & Murray, S. (2003). Ideational productivity, focus of attention, and context. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 153–166. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalil, P. A. (2007). Working memory, cerebellum, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 39–45. doi:10.1080/10400410709336878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J., Arambel-Lui, S., Greenblat, R., … Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve problems with insight. Public Library of Science (Biology), 2, 500–510.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (2013). Seeing what others don't: The remarkable ways we gain insights. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G., & Jarosz, A. (2011). A naturalistic study of insight. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 5, 335–351. doi:10.1177/1555343411427013
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34–53. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, T. (2004). The physical context of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 89–96. doi:10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (2001) Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1334_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainemelis, C. (2002). Time and timelessness: Creativity in (and out of) the temporal dimension. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 227–238. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1402_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander, T., & Gustafson, R. (1997). Effects of alcohol on picture drawing during the verification phase of the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 355–362. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1004_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander, T., & Gustafson, R. (1998). Effects of alcohol on a divergent figural fluency test during the illumination phase of the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 265–274. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1103_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlet, S. (2008). An expanding view on incubation. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 297–308. doi:10.1080/10400410802278743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osbeck, L. M., & Held, B. S. (Eds.). (2014). Rational intuition: Philosophical roots, scientific investigations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pagel, J. F., & Kwiatkowski, C. F. (2003). Creativity and dreaming: Correlation of reported dream incorporation into waking behavior with level and type of creative interest. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 199–205. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, C. (1937). Creative thought in artists. Journal of Psychology, 4, 35–73. doi:10.1080/00223980.1937.9917525
   Google Scholar
• Penaloza, A. A., & Calvillo, D. P. (2012). Incubation provides relief from artificial fixation in problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 338–344. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.730329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poincaré, H. (1908–1952). Mathematical creation. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process: Reflections on invention in the arts and sciences (pp. 22–31). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Policastro, E. (1995). Creative intuition: An integrative review. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 99–113. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0802_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi, D., & Sharma, N. K. (2010). Creativity under concurrent and sequential task conditions. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 139–150. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rignano, E. (1923) The psychology of reasoning. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. London, England: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Inside intuition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E., & Shefy, E. (2007). Developing intuitive awareness in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 186–205. doi:10.5465/amle.2007.25223458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 137–154. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, E. (2004). Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 141–148. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1988) Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sio, U. N., & Rudowicz, E. (2007). The role of an incubation period in creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 307–318. doi:10.1080/10400410701397453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, G. S., & Thurston, M. (2010). The five star method: A relational dream work methodology. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5, 204–215. doi:10.1080/15401383.2010.485113
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2014). Creative intuition: How Eureka results from three neural mechanisms. In L. M. Osbeck & B. S. Held (Eds.), Rational intuition: Philosophical roots, scientific investigations (pp. 287–306). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varendonck, J. (1921) The psychology of daydreams. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Neuroscience of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, K. W. (1938). Intuition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wundt, W. (1896) Grundriss der Psychologie. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y. C. (2004). The interactive influences of three ecological systems on R&D employees’ technological creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 11–25. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar