Linkographic Evidence for Concurrent Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Creative Design

REFERENCES

• Auzmendi, E., Villa, A., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a newly constructed multiple-choice creativity instrument. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 89–95. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0901_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. S. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 63–75. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0801_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. S., Wakabayashi, M., & Graen, G. B. (1990). Individual problem solving styles and attitudes toward divergent thinking before and after training. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 22–32. doi:10.1080/10400419009534331
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1994). Engineering design methods—Strategies for product design. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (Eds.). (1996). Analysing design activity. London, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N., & Clayburn Cross, A. (1995). Observations of teamwork and social processes in design. Design Studies, 16, 143–170. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00007-Z
   Google Scholar
• Dong, A. (2007). The enactment of design through language. Design Studies, 28, 5–21. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22, 425–437. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
   Google Scholar
• Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103–120. doi:10.1002/jee.2005.94.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage, 59, 1783–1794. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Free Dictionary. (n.d.). Divergent thinking. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/divergent+thinking. Accessed January 25, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Free Dictionary. (n.d.). Convergent thinking. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/convergent+thinking. Accessed January 25, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, G. (1996). Successful individual approaches in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 8, 151–165. doi:10.1007/BF01608350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the ‘neurds’: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/10400410903579494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, V. (2014). Creative brains: Designing in the real world. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(Article 241), 1–14. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies, 16, 189–209. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00009-3
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (2013). A micro view of design reasoning: Two-way shifts between embodiment and rationale. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Creativity and rationale: Enhancing human experience by design (pp. 41–55). London, UK: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: Unfolding the design process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. (1980). Afterword. In D. H. Feldman (Ed.), Beyond universals in cognitive development (pp. 177–178). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E., & Davies, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 243–270). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ichino, J. (2011, September 24–28). Discriminating divergent/convergent phases of meeting using non-verbal speech patterns. In S. Bødker, N. O. Bouvin, W. Lutters, V. Wulf, & L. Ciolfi (Eds.), ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 153–172). Aarhus, Denmark: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (1999). When sparks fly: Harnessing the power of group creativity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linhares, A., Freitas, A. E. T. A., Mendes, A., & Silva, J. S. (2012). Entanglement of perception and reasoning in the combinatorial game of chess: Differential errors of strategic reconstruction. Cognitive Systems Research, 13, 72–86. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-C., Blight, T., & Chakrabarti, A. (2003). Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation. Design Studies, 24, 341–355. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00003-6
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232. doi:10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1981). The mind’s best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1992). The topography of invention. In R. J. Weber, & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 238–250). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S. (1991). Total design: Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Roozenberg, N. F. M., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: Fundamentals and mthods. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1991). The evaluative, valuative and divergent thinking of children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311–319. doi:10.1002/jocb.1991.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Basadur, M. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2, 166–173. doi:10.1111/caim.1993.2.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical-norms manual. Bensenville, Il: Scholastic Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Chou, J. Y. (2010). Creativity: Design and breadth. In T. Taura, & Y. Nagai (Eds.), Design creativity 2010 (pp. 209–214). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, K. K., & Jelle, H. G. (1996). Test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). Lisse, Netherland:. Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, R. V. V. (2010). Creative problem solving: An applied university course. Pesquisa Operacional, 30, 405–426. doi:10.1590/S0101-74382010000200009
   Google Scholar