Ecological and Dynamical Study of the Creative Process and Affects of Scientific Students Working in Groups

REFERENCES

• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Aragon, C. R., & Williams, A. (2011). Collaborative creativity: A complex systems model with distributed affect. CHI’11 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1875–1884.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnardel, N. (2006). Créativité et conception. Approches cognitives et ergonomiques [Creativity and conception. Cognitive and ergonomic approaches]. Marseille, France: Solal Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Botella, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. I. (2011). A dynamic and ecological approach to the artistic creative process of arts students: An empirical contribution. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 29, 17–38. doi:10.2190/EM.29.1.b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & S. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change. Washington, DC: APA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1994). The affective consequences of artistic and scientific problem solving. Cognition & Emotion, 8(6), 489–502. doi:10.1080/02699939408408955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., & Kramer, T. J. (2003). Effects of member mood states in creative performance in temporary workgroups. Groups Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 41–54. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-H., & Song, K.-S. (2012). The effects of thinking style based cooperative learning on groups creativity. Creative Education, 3(Supplement), 20–24. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.38B005
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (2000-2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 285–301. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité [Psychology of creativity]. Paris, France: Armand Collin.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York, NY: Scribners.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1997). The creativity research handbook. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1999). Divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritsker (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 577–582). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. P. (1989). The eureka process: A structure for the creative experience in science and engineering. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 286–298. doi:10.1080/10400418909534325
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. P. (1994). Affective components of scientific creativity. In M. P. Shaw, & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity and Affect (pp. 3–43). Westport, CA: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1980). Intuition and analysis: A predictive and explanatory model. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 102, 3–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar