Fluency or Similarities? Cognitive Abilities that Contribute to Creative Metaphor Generation

REFERENCES

• Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: Cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory and Cognition, 41, 255–267. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0258-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (1981). Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 430–445. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(81)90028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112, 193–216. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: TONI-3 (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Carriedo, N., Corral, A., Montoro, P. R., Herrero, L., Ballestrino, P., & Sebastián, I. (2016). The development of metaphor comprehension and its relationship with relational verbal reasoning and executive function. PLoS One, 11(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P. (2007). The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 172–188. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chukovsky, K. (1968). From two to five (Rev. ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicone, M., Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1981). Understanding the psychology in psychological metaphors. Journal of Child Language, 8, 213–216. doi:10.1017/S0305000900003123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (2001). Some notes on brain, imagination and creativity. In K. H. Pfenninger, & V. R. Shubik (Eds.), The origins of creativity (pp. 59–68). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1011–1026. doi:10.3758/BF03196731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourment, M.-C., Emmenecker, N., & Pantz, V. (1987). Etude de la production de etaphores chez des enfants de 3 a 7 ans [A study of metaphors production on 3–7 years old children]. L’Annee Psychologique, 87, 535–551. doi:10.3406/psy.1987.29233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59. doi:10.2307/1130388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1956). Structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293. doi:10.1037/h0040755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
   Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurks, P. P. M., Vles, J. S. H., Hendriksen, J. G. M., Kalff, A. C., Feron, F. J. M., Kroes, M., ... Jolles, J (2006). Semantic category fluency versus initial letter fluency over 60 seconds as a measure of automatic and controlled processing in healthy school-aged children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 684–695. doi:10.1080/13803390590954191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasirer, A., & Mashal, N. (2016a). Comprehension and generation of metaphors by children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 32, 53–63. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasirer, A., & Mashal, N. (2016b). Comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in children, adolescents, and adults with Dyslexia. Dyslexia. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/dys.1550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m creative—But not in mathematics! Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143–155. doi:10.2190/26HQ-VHE8-GTLN-BJJM
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–329). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kavé, G. (2005a). Standardization and norms for a Hebrew naming test. Brain and Language, 92, 204–211. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavé, G. (2005b). Phonemic fluency, semantic fluency, and difference scores: Normative data for adult Hebrew speakers. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 690–699. doi:10.1080/13803390490918499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavé, G., Kigel, S., & Kochva, R. (2008). Switching and clustering in verbal fluency tasks throughout childhood. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 349–359. doi:10.1080/13803390701416197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landa, R. J., & Goldberg, M. C. (2005). Language, social, and executive functions in high functioning autism: A continuum of performance. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 557–573. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0001-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1995). The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 261–283. doi:10.1006/jecp.1995.1041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (2002). The creation of new figurative expressions: Psycholinguistic evidence in Italian children, adolescents and adults. Journal of Child Language, 29, 127–150. doi:10.1017/S0305000901004950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashal, N. (2013). The role of working memory in the comprehension of unfamiliar and familiar metaphors. Language and Cognition, 5, 409–436. doi:10.1515/langcog-2013-0024
   Google Scholar
• Mashal, N., & Kasirer, A. (2011). Thinking maps enhance metaphoric competence in children with autism and learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2045–2054. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, R. M., & Livne, N. (2006). Research on creativity in Israel: A chronicle of theoretical and empirical development. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 307–336). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, R. M., Milgram, N., & Landau, E. (1974). Identification of gifted children in Israel: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University, School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nall, S. L. (1983). Dimensions of metaphor comprehension in third, fifth and seventh graders (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Wake Forest University, Department of Psychology, Winston-Salem, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. (J. B. Thompson, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, A., DeMers, S. T., Stilwell, W., Graybeal, S., & Zins, J. (1983). Comparison of interrater reliability on the Torance Tests of Creative Thinking for gifted and non-gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 35–40. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(198301)20:1<35::AID-PITS2310200110>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2010). Education based on a parsimonious theory of creativity. In R. A. Beghetto, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 235–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2015). Meta-creativity: Being creative about creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 295–298. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1065134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–351. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical-norms manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Van Herwegen, J., Dimitriou, D., & Rundblad, G. (2013). Performance on verbal and low-verbal false belief tasks in children with Williams syndrome. Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 440–448. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity intelligence distinction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children: WISC-IV^HEB (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E., McCarthy, M., Kleinman, S., & Gardner, H. (1979). First metaphors. New Directions for Child Development, 3, 29–42. doi:10.1002/cd.23219790305
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. K., & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, 12, 289–297. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.12.4.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar