Creativity and Religiosity: A Reanalysis with Regional Predictors

References

• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 229–238. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averill, J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates. Journal of Personality, 62, 331–371. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00058
   Google Scholar
• Bénabou, R., Ticchi, A., & Vindigni, A. (2013). Forbidden fruits: The political economy of science, religion and growth. Princeton University, Research Paper No. 065-2014, Dietrich Economic Theory Center.
   Google Scholar
• Burch-Brown, J., & Baker, W. (2016). Religion and reducing prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 784–807. doi:10.1177/1368430216629566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvani, A., & Cesaretti, M. P. (1974). Creativity and social attitudes. Bollettino Di Psicologia Applicata, 124–126, 107–108.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, S. (1996). Centennial blues: Reflections on creativity and literature in Utah. Western Humanities Review, 50, 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–1035. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Bizumic, B. (2013). Multidimensionality of right‐wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism‐conservatism‐traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34, 841–862. doi:10.1111/pops.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Haq, M. M. G., Abdelaziz, H. H., & Mohamed, A. A. (2016). When every innovation is misguidance, and every misguidance is in hell: The relationship between religious fundamentalism and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 163–167. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faschingbauer, T. R., & Eglevsky, D. A. (1977). Relation of dogmatism to creativity. Psychological Reports, 40, 391–394. doi:10.2466/pr0.1977.40.2.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauteux, K. (1995a). Beyond unity: Religious experience, creativity, and psychology. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 14, 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Fauteux, K. (1995b). Regression and reparation in religious experience and creativity. Pastoral Psychology, 43, 163–175. doi:10.1007/BF02253784
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 4, 366–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). Avery brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The adjective check list manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta–analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. L., & Astin, A. W. (1962). The prediction of the academic, artistic, scientific, and social achievement of undergraduates of superior scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 132–143. doi:10.1037/h0040758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. International Scholarly Research Network (ISRN) Psychiatry, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Subramanian, S. V., Gortmaker, S. L., & Kawachi, I. (2006). US state-and county-level social capital in relation to obesity and physical inactivity: A multilevel, multivariable analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1045–1059. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, S. J. H. (2011). Conservatism, openness, and creativity: Patents granted to residents of American states. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 339–345. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.621831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2010). Religiosity and life satisfaction across nations. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13, 155–169. doi:10.1080/13674670903273801
   Google Scholar
• Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2015). The more religiosity, the less creativity across US counties. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 1, 81–87. doi:10.18536/bcce.2015.07.1.1.09
   Google Scholar
• Paek, S. H., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Dealing with the criterion problem by measuring the quality and quantity of creative activity and accomplishment. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 167–173. doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1304078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, B. E., & Pang, J. S. (2006). Beyond politics: Authoritarianism and the pursuit of leisure. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 443–461. doi:10.3200/SOCP.146.4.443-461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, D. R., & Schroer, N. A. (1978). Is creativity incompatible with orthodoxy? Journal of Psychology and Theology, 6, 98–103. doi:10.1177/009164717800600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouff, L. L. (1975). Openness, creativity and complexity. Psychological Reports, 37, 1009–1010. doi:10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3.1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, G. (2003). Authoritarianism and its relation to creativity: A comparative study among students of design, behavioral sciences and law. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 695–705. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00055-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2012). Parsimonious creativity and dogma. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 136–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M., & Tripp, S. (2014). The incremental validity of a short form of the Ideational Behavior Scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Acar, S., Campbell, W. K., Jaeger, G., McCain, J., & Gentile, B. (2016). Regional creativity as measured objectively and with perceptions of community support and community barriers. Business Creativity and Creative Economy, 2, 83–92. doi:10.18536/bcce.2016.10.2.1.08
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Acar, S., & Cayirdag, N. (2017). Further evidence that creativity and innovation are inhibited by conservative thinking: Analyses of the 2016 presidential election. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 331–336. doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1360069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., & Luptak, Y. (1990). Agreement between mothers and sons on ratings of creative activity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 673–680. doi:10.1177/0013164490503025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2000-2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and applied multilevel analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• West, D. C. (1993). Cross-national creative personalities, processes, and agency philosophies. Journal of Advertising Research, 33, 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar