Noradrenergic Modulation of Creativity: Evidence from Pupillometry

References

• Acland, B. T., & Braver, T. S. (2014). Cili (v0.5.4) [Software]. doi:10.5281/zenodo.48843
   Google Scholar
• Akbari Chermahini, S., Hickendorff, M., & Hommel, B. (2012). Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task: An item-response theory approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 177–186. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-noradrenaline function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 403–450. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston-Jones, G., & Waterhouse, B. (2016). Locus coeruleus: From global projection system to adaptive regulation of behavior. Brain Research, 1645, 75–78. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, M., de Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. doi:10.1037/a0012815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, N., Baas, M., van Gaal, S., Cools, R., & de Dreu, C. K. (2017). Creative cognition and dopaminergic modulation of fronto-striatal networks: Integrative review and research Agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 78, 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72–79. doi:10.1080/02783190009554069
   Google Scholar
• Dalmaijer, E. S., Mathôt, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). PyGaze: An open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 913–921. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rooij, A., & Jones, S. (2013, June). Mood and creativity: An appraisal tendency perspective. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 362–365). New York, NY: ACM Publications.
   Google Scholar
• de Rooij, A., & Vromans, R. D. (2018). The (dis) pleasures of creativity: Spontaneous eye blink rate during divergent and convergent thinking depends on individual differences in positive and negative affect. The Journal of Creative Behavior, online first.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Singley, A. T. M., & Bunge, S. A. (2017). Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 69–91. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123(2), 303–307. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, M. S., Sackeim, H. A., Rush, A. J., Marangell, L. B., Nahas, Z., Husain, M. M., & Ballenger, J. C. (2000). Vagus nerve stimulation: A new tool for brain research and therapy. Biological Psychiatry, 47(4), 287–295. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00308-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghacibeh, G. A., Shenker, J. I., Shenal, B., Uthman, B. M., & Heilman, K. M. (2006). Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on creativity and cognitive flexibility. Epilepsy & Behavior, 8(4), 720–725. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilzenrat, M. S., Nieuwenhuis, S., Jepma, M., & Cohen, J. D. (2010). Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 252–269. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.2.252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselmo, M. E., Linster, C., Patil, M., Ma, D., & Cekic, M. (1997). Noradrenergic suppression of synaptic transmission may influence cortical signal-to-noise ratio. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(6), 3326–3339. doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, T. R., & Petrov, A. A. (2015). Pupil diameter tracks the exploration–Exploitation trade-off during analogical reasoning and explains individual differences in fluid intelligence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(2), 308–318. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, K. M. (2016). Possible brain mechanisms of creativity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(4), 285–296. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2010). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for innovation and change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jepma, M., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2011). Pupil diameter predicts changes in the exploration–Exploitation trade-off: Evidence for the adaptive gain theory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1587–1596. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154(3756), 1583–1585. doi:10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The Aha! moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 210–216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01638.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1971). Remote associates test. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Minzenberg, M. J., Watrous, A. J., Yoon, J. H., Ursu, S., & Carter, C. S. (2008). Modafinil shifts human locus coeruleus to low-tonic, high-phasic activity during functional MRI. Science, 322(5908), 1700–1702. doi:10.1126/science.1164908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, A. D. (2014). The effects of modafinil on convergent and divergent thinking of creativity: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), 252–267. doi:10.1002/jocb.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, U., Rowe, J. B., Rittman, T., Lewis, C., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2013). Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers. Neuropharmacology, 64, 490–495. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47. doi:10.1002/jocb.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, J., McGinley, M. J., Liu, Y., Rodenkirch, C., Wang, Q., McCormick, D. A., & Tolias, A. S. (2016). Pupil fluctuations track rapid changes in adrenergic and cholinergic activity in cortex. Nature Communications, 7, 1–7. doi:10.1038/ncomms13289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2016). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243–253. doi:10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvi, C., & Bowden, E. M. (2016). Looking for creativity: Where do we look when we look for new ideas? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 161. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, K., Wang, W. W., Han, R., McFadden, K., & Valentino, R. J. (2012). Corticotropin-releasing factor in the norepinephrine nucleus, locus coeruleus, facilitates behavioral flexibility. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37(2), 520. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervo, D. G., Proskurin, M., Manakov, M., Kabra, M., Vollmer, A., Branson, K., & Karpova, A. Y. (2014). Behavioral variability through stochastic choice and its gating by anterior cingulate cortex. Cell, 159(1), 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, M., Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., Rajkowski, J., & Aston-Jones, G. (1999). The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. Science, 283(5401), 549–554. doi:10.1126/science.283.5401.549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O. (2009). Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 57–59. doi:10.1037/a0014781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabelina, D., Saporta, A., & Beeman, M. (2016). Flexible or leaky attention in creative people? Distinct patterns of attention for different types of creative thinking. Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 488–498. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0569-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24–37. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar