Errors in Creative Problem-Solving: Identify, Deliberate, and Remediate

References

• Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1204_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaans, H. H. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Communication Research Journal, 14, 41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 271–340.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, K., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). Mindsets and pre-conscious open-mindedness to incidental information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 48–61. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Evaluation, criticism, and creativity: Criticism content and effects on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 314. doi:10.1037/a0032616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, C. M., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2007). Development and validation of the five-factor model Questionnaire (FFMQ): An adjectival-based personality inventory for use in occupational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 731–766. doi:10.1111/peps.2007.60.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403–422). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1119. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsley, G., Ruch, F. L., Warren, N. P., & Ford, J. S. (1985). Manual for the employee attitude survey, test of verbal reasoning. Glendale, CA: Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. M., Farr, J. L., & Sherman, P. O. C. (2011). The role of errors in the creative and innovative process. In D. A. Hoffman & M. Frese (Eds.), Errors in organizations (pp. 67–96). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. A., & Frese, M. (Eds.). (2011). Error in organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2005). Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 59. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korte, R. F. (2003). Biases in decision making and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 440–457. doi:10.1177/1523422303257287
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Z., Naveh, E., & Novikov, Z. (2016). Errors in organizations: An integrative review via level of analysis, temporal dynamism, and priority lenses. Journal of Management, 42, 1315–1343. doi:10.1177/0149206316633745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licuanan, B. F., Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 1–27. doi:10.1002/jocb.2007.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 231–246. doi:10.1080/10400419.2004.9651455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123–140. doi:10.1080/10400410701397180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and the group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 97–120. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1–21. doi:10.1037/h0093850
   Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 30–47. doi:10.1002/jocb.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter‐Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122. doi:10.1080/10400419109534380
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Owens, W. A. (1987). Methodology review: Principles, procedures, and findings in the application of background data measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 1–31. doi:10.1177/014662168701100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1984). Stages and levels in human-machine interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 365–375. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80054-1
   Google Scholar
• Osburn, H. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem-solving skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 173–190. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1802_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purser, R. E., Pasmore, W. A., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1992). The influence of deliberations on learning in new product development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 9, 1–28. doi:10.1016/0923-4748(92)90009-T
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 257–266. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York, NY: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120–151. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, A., Bagnara, S., & Visciola, M. (1987). Human error detection processes. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 555–570. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80015-9
   Google Scholar
• Robledo, I. C., Hester, K. S., Peterson, D. R., Barrett, J. D., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Errors and understanding: The effects of error-management training on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 220–234. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, F. L., & Ruch, W. W. (1980). Employee aptitude survey: Technical report. Los Angeles, CA: Psychological Services, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 121–148. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, B., & Olivera, F. (2006). Error reporting in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31, 1012–1030. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22528167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar