Measurement of Creative Teaching in Mathematics Class

References

• Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T., Goldfarb, P., & Brackfield, S. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3(1), 6–21. doi:10.1080/10400419009534330
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayele, M. A. (2016). Mathematics teachers’ perceptions on enhancing students’ creativity in mathematics. IEJME Mathematics Education, 11(10), 3521–3536.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163. doi:10.1080/02783190509554310
   Google Scholar
• Balka, D. S. (1974). Creative ability in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 21(7), 633–636.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2005, September). Does assessment kill student creativity? The Educational Forum, 69(3), 254–263. Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1080/00131720508984694
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All Roads lead to creativity” or “You can’t get there from here”? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 316–332). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities: An introduction to gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 37–47. doi:10.4219/jsge-2005-393
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii–xvi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Kim, H., & Kim, S. (2002). KEDI’s simplified creative problem solving scale. Seoul, Korea: Korean Educational Development.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (1996). Working with able learners in regular classrooms in the United Kingdom. Gifted and Talented International, 11(1), 34–38. doi:10.1080/15332276.1996.11672839
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, A. M. (Ed.). (2010). Creativity: Fostering, measuring and contexts. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. (2008) Creativity, innovation and territorial agglomeration in cultural activities: The roots of the creative city. In P. Cooke & L. Lazzaretti (Eds.), Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic development (pp. 183–210). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (1998). Educators’ perspectives on creativity: An english study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 244–257. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00820.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. (2001). Creativity in education & learning. Bodmin, Cornwall: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research book (pp. 83–114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Fostering creativity in engineering undergraduates. High Ability Studies, 12, 207–220. doi:10.1080/13598130020001223
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D., Jindal-snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats: An essential approach to business management. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148–153. doi:10.1080/02783190009554022
   Google Scholar
• Dikici, A. (2011). Implicit theories of creativity: The adaptation to Turkish culture of what do you think of creativity scale. Education Sciences, 6(1), 589–604.
   Google Scholar
• Dikici, A. (2013). The adaptation of creativity fostering primary teachers index scale into Turkish. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13, 318–323.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. (1997). Development of fifth grade children’s problem posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 183–217. doi:10.1023/A:1002963618035
   Google Scholar
• Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42–52). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Esquivel, G. B. (1995). Teacher behaviors that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(2), 185–202. doi:10.1007/BF02212493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R. (1991). Creative thinking in the decision and management sciences cincinnati. Ohio: South-Western Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. (1995). Teaching children to think. Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thorne’s (Publishers) Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, V., & Hui, A. (2007). Creativity in Hong Kong classroom: What is the contextual practice? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 30–38. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouche, K. K. (1993). Problem solving and creativity: Multiple solution methods in a cross-cultural study in middle level mathematic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18(2), 103–111. doi:10.1080/02783199509553709
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A. (2017). Mathematical creativity and giftedness: Perspectives in response. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 147–157. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0837-9
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ: Guide to improving intelligence and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2016). Creativity and education. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, Y. (1997). The methods of fostering creativity through mathematical problem solving. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29, 86–87.
   Google Scholar
• Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. ZDM Mathematic Education, 27(2), 68–74. doi:10.1007/s11858-997-0002-y
   Google Scholar
• Haylock, D. W. (1985). Conflicts in the assessment and encouragement of mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 16(4), 547–553. doi:10.1080/0020739850160412
   Google Scholar
• Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(1), 59–74. doi:10.1007/BF00367914
   Google Scholar
• Horng, J. S., Hong, J. C., ChanLin, L. J., Chang, S. H., & Chu, H. C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352–358. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00445.x
   Google Scholar
• Hoth, J., Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2017). Professional competences of teachers for fostering creativity and supporting high‑achieving students. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0817-5
   Google Scholar
• İpşiroğlu, N. (1993). Türk eğitim sisteminde yaratıcılık. Ankara, TR: Şafak Matbaacılık.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G. (1995). On the conceptual foundations of creative problem solving: a response to magyari-beck. Creativity and Innovation Management, 4, 52–63. doi:10.1111/caim.1995.4.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. (2005). Creativity in history teaching and learning: Subject perspectives on creativity in higher education working paper. Portsmouth, UK: University of Portsmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. R. (1973). The relationships among mathematical creativity, numerical aptitude and mathematical achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34(5), 2168.
   Google Scholar
• Kampylis, P., Berki, E., & Saariluoma, P. (2009). In-service and prospective teachers’ conceptions of creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 15–29. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, A. (2017). Some thoughts on gifted education and creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 159–168. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0838-8
   Google Scholar
• Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D. M., & Szwajkowski, W. (2017). Creativity, imagination, and early mathematics education. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 7–22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, H. (1997). Acting artist-like in the classroom: Modern rational technological world comes to life through the creativity arising from the artistic paradigm of acting. ZDM: International Reviews on Mathematics Education, 29(3), 88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, O.-N., Park, J.-S., & Park, J.-H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7, 51–61. doi:10.1007/BF030367840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman and B. Koichu (Eds.). Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students, 9, 129–145.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Seoul, Korea: The Korean Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Dinur, S. (2017). How are questions that students ask in high level mathematics classes linked to general giftedness? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 65–80. doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0815-7
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., Subotnik, R., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Singer, F. M., & Pelczer, I. (2013). Teachers’ views on creativity in mathematics education: An international survey. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 309–324. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0472-4
   Google Scholar
• Leung, S. S. (1997). On the role of creative thinking in problem posing. ZDM, 97(2), 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring collective mathematical creativity in elementary school. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 215–234. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2011). Creative mathematics teaching in the eye of the beholder: Focusing on teachers’ conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 17–32. doi:10.1080/14794802.2011.550715
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. Y., & Cho, S. (2011). Predicting creative problem-solving in math from a dynamic system model of creative problem solving ability. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 255–261. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.595986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. S. (2011). Fostering creativity through education–A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 2(3), 149–155. doi:10.4236/ce.2011.23021
   Google Scholar
• Luria, S. R., Sriraman, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 1033–1039. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0892-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H. H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 30–42. doi:10.1080/10400410802633400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, E., Chamberlin, S. A., & Graefe, A. K. (2017). The prominence of affect in creativity: Expanding the conception of creativity in mathematical problem solving. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 57–76). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, H. (2000, July–August). Creativity in mathematics education. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Congress on Mathematical Education, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Mhlolo, M. K. (2017). Regular classroom teachers’ recognition and support of the creative potential of mildly gifted mathematics learners. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 81–94. doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0824-6
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S., & Forster, J. (1999). Creativity in the classroom. Gifted Education International, 14(1), 29–43. doi:10.1177/026142949901400105
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In M. A. Runo (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 3–39). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, W., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, X. (2017). Understanding the Chinese approach to creative teaching in mathematics classrooms. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 1023–1031. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0887-z
   Google Scholar
• Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. ZDM, 29(3), 63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 89–106. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (2014). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, C. (1957). Developing creative thinking in arithmetic. Arithmetic Teacher, 4, 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Romey, W. D. (1970). What is your creativity quotient? School Science and Mathematics, 70, 3–8. doi:10.1111/ssm.1970.70.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Savic, M., Karakok, G., Tang, G., El Turkey, H., & Naccarato, E. (2017). Formative assessment of creativity in undergraduate mathematics: Using a Creativity-in-Progress Rubric (CPR) on proving. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 23–46). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2011). Structure and improvisation in creative teaching. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Creativity and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada, S. (1997). The significance of an open-ended approach. In J. P. Becker & S. Shimada (Eds.), The open-ended: A new proposal for teaching mathematics (pp. 1–9). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Shriki, A. (2009). Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 159–179. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9212-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 3, 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, F. M., Sheffield, L. J., & Leikin, R. (2017). Advancements in research on creativity and giftedness in mathematics education: Introduction to the special issue. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 5–12. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0836-x
   Google Scholar
• Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: Implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 37–52. doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0820-x
   Google Scholar
• Singer, I. (2011). Modes of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soh, K. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behaviour: A preliminary validation study. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 34(2), 118–134. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01205.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education., 17(1), 20–36. doi:10.4219/jsge-2005-389
   Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B., Yaftian, N., & Lee, K. (2011). Mathematical creativity and mathematics education: A derivative of existing research. In B. Sriraman & K. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 119–130). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B. (2017). Mathematical creativity: Psychology, progress and caveats. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 971–975. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0886-0
   Google Scholar
• Starko, A. J. (2013). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197–224. doi:10.1159/000275810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Intelligence and lifelong learning. What’s new and how can we use it? American Psychologist, 52, 1134–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325–338. doi:10.1080/00313830308595
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2006a). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2006b). Introduction. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2017). School mathematics as a creative enterprise. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 977–986. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0884-2
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31. doi:10.1159/000277029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Creativity: Its nature and assessment. School Psychology International, 13, 243–253. doi:10.1177/0143034392133004
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1993). Investing in creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 229–232. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0403_16
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 667–688. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2017). Algebraic procedures and creative thinking. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 53–63. doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0803-y
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A. G. (2001). Singaporean teachers’ perceptions of activities useful for fostering creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 131–148. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1970). Encouraging creativity in the classroom. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1999). Torrance test of creative thinking: Norms and technical manual. Beaconville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative problem solving: The history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 342–353. doi:10.1177/001698620504900407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, K. K. (1991). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal of High Ability, 1(1), 99–113. doi:10.1080/0937445900010114
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Holton, D. (2009). Snapshots of creativity in undergraduate mathematics education. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 345–365). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Revisiting the investment theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 229–238. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.595974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar