An Instrument for Assessing the Development of Scientific Imagination via Digital Storytelling for Elementary School Students

REFERENCES

• Andrich, D. (2010). Sufficiency and conditional estimation of person parameters in the polytomous Rasch model. Psychometrika, 75(2), 292–308. doi:10.1007/S11336-010-9154-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., & Ho, Y. H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth–Fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 369–388. doi:10.1177/0013164408323241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. K. (2006). Digital storytelling in integrated arts education. The International Journal of Arts Education, 4, 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Digital Storytelling Association. (2002). Digital storytelling. Retrieved from http://www.dsaweb.org/01associate/ds.html
   Google Scholar
• Dorner, R., Grimm, P., & Abawi, D. (2002). Synergies between interactive training simulations and digital storytelling: A component-based framework. Computers & Graphics, 26, 45–55. doi:10.1016/S0097-8493(01)00177-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman, B., & Göcen, G. (2015). The effect of the digital storytelling method on pre-service teachers’ creative writing skills. Anthropologist, 20, 215–222.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhoff, A., & Urbach, J. (2008). Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 179–185. doi:10.1007/s10643-008-0261-4
   Google Scholar
• Gere, J. (2002). Storytelling tools for the classroom. In J. Gere, B.-A. Kozlovich, & D. A. I. Kelin (Eds.), By word of mouth: A storytelling guide for the classroom (pp. 1–8). Hawaii, USA: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, H. C., Wang, C. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Analysis of the scientific imagination process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 68–78. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51, 1648–1663. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, R. (1996). Instruction and experience for abilities related to creative processes and products. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 156–178.
   Google Scholar
• ISTE. (2016). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://conference.iste.org/uploads/ISTE2017/HANDOUTS/KEY_108218083/2016ISTEStandardsforStudents.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. (2009). Investigating digital storytelling and Portfolios in teacher education. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Kelderman, H. (1996). Multidimensional Rasch models for Partial credit scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 155–168. doi:10.1177/014662169602000205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2005). Learning from each other: Creativity in East Asian and American education. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 337–347. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1704_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (1998). Thurstone thresholds and the Rasch model. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 12, 634−635.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 245–251. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, H. (2014). An empirical review of research methodologies and methods in creativity studies (2003-2012). Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 427–438. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.961781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, G., & Fleming, D. (2007). Innovation through design: A constructivist approach to learning Melbourne, Australia: ( LAB3000), RMIT University. Retrieved from http://lab.3000.com.au/research/research/index.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, A. (2010). Imagine and invent: Create a great future. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23, 1323. doi:10.3102/0013189X023002013
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995a). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14, 5–8. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995b). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry intoscore meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohler, J. (2006). The world of digital storytelling. Educational Leadership, 63, 44–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnes, S. T. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York, NY: Chararles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 213–255). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, B. (2005). Digitales: The art of telling digital stories. Colorado, USA: Denver. Bernajean Porter Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Institute of Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, F., Li, X., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2012). Progression of Chinese students’ creative imagination from elementary through high school. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2043–2059. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.709334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into Practice, 47, 220–228. doi:10.1080/00405840802153916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94, 8–13. doi:10.1177/003172171209400203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 487–506. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J., Marsh, J., Erstad, O., & Flewitt, R. (2016). Establishing a research agenda for the digital literacy practices of young children: A white paper for COST action IS1410. Retrieved from http://digilitey.eu
   Google Scholar
• Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1, 1–21. doi:10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3
   Google Scholar
• Teo, L. K. C., & Waugh, R. F. (2010). A Rasch measure of fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 206–218. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning, technology, and education reform in the knowledge age or we’re wired, webbed, and windowed, now what? Educational Technology, 39(3), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, S. L. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97. doi:10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C., Cheng, Y. Y., & Ho, H. C. (2016). Development of the scientific imagination test-figural. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61, 177–204. in Chinese doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C., Ho, H. C., Cheng, C. L., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2014). Application of the Rasch model to the measurement of creativity: The creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 62–71. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.843347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C., Ho, H. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2015). Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C., Niemi, H., Cheng, C. L., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2017). Validation of learning progression in scientific imagination using data from Taiwanese and Finnish elementary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 73–85. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. C. (2008). Assessment of differential item functioning. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 1–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wechsler, S. M., Vendramini, C. M. M., & Oakland, T. (2012). Thinking and creative styles: A validity study. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 235–242. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II-Validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 204−233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, J. J. (2002). Enticing the crouching tiger and awakening the hidden dragon: Recognizing and nurturing creativity in Chinese students. Research in Applied Psychology, 15, 17–42. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2007). ConQuest [Computer software and manual]. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar