Examining Teachers’ Perspectives of School-Based Opportunities and Support for Student Creativity with the ICI Index

References

• Adobe (2014). Hiring for the future: Seeking creative candidates [PDF of PowerPoint Presentation]. Retrieved from https://landing.adobe.com/dam/downloads/whitepapers/67163.en.edu-creative-candidates-study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Albert, R. S. (1996). Some reasons why childhood creativity often fails to make it past puberty into the real world. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), New directions for child development: No. 72. creativity from childhood through adulthood: The developmental issues (pp. 43–56). San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 17–34. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. K., Robbins, M. A., Payne, Y. D., & Brown, K. B. (2016). Using enrichment clusters to address the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Gifted Child Today, 39(2), 84–97. doi:10.1177/1076217516628568
   Google Scholar
• Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] Education Working Papers No. 41). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. R. (2002). Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love. Journal of Education, 183(1), 33–48. doi:10.1177/002205740218300104
   Google Scholar
• Andilou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 201–219. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2008). Prospective teachers’ beliefs about imaginative thinking in K-12 schooling. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 134–142. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity in teaching. In J. C. Kaufman, J. Baer, & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across different domains (pp. 549–564). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Dilley, A. E. (2016). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151), 85–95. doi:10.1002/cad.20150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. doi:10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25–56. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2014). Possibility thinking: From what is to what might be. In S. Robson & S. Flannery Quinn (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of young children’s thinking and understanding (pp. 416–432). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A., Cremin, T., Hay, P., & Clack, J. (2014). Creative primary schools: Developing and maintaining pedagogy for creativity. Ethnography and Education, 9(1), 16–34. doi:10.1080/17457823.2013.828474
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, T., Barnes, J., & Scoffham, S. (2006). Creative teaching for tomorrow: Fostering a creative state of mind. Kent, UK: Future Creative. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269699596_Creative_Teaching_for_Tomorrow_Fostering_a_Creative_State_of_Mind
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1995). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83–114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—a systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, K. M., & Jacobs, S. (2015). State of the states 2015: Evaluating teaching, leading and learning. National Council on Teacher Quality. Retrieved from https://www.nctq.org/dmsView/StateofStates2015
   Google Scholar
• Eason, R., Giannangelo, D. M., & Franceschini, L. A. (2009). A look at creativity in public and private schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 130–137. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Commission of the States (2017, December). 50-State comparison: States’ school accountability systems. Retrieved from https://www.ecs.org/50-state-comparison-states-school-accountability-systems/
   Google Scholar
• Fleith, D. D. S. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148–153. doi:10.1080/02783190009554022
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. (1994). Current and historical thinking on education for gifted and talented students. In P. O. Ross (Ed.), National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. An anthology of readings (pp. 83-107). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Adelson, J. L., Carroll, S. R., & Sheffield, L. J. (2009). The impact of advanced curriculum on the achievement of mathematically promising elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 188–202. doi:10.1177/0016986209334964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. doi:10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). We teach who we are: Creativity in the lives and practices of accomplished teachers. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(7), 1–46. doi:10.1177/016146811511700708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Business Management Corporation (2010). Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the Global Chief Executive Officer study. Retrieved from: https://www-935.ibm.com/services/c-suite/series-download.html
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. doi:10.1080/0305569032000159750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers’ perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n39.2004
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. (2011). Fostering creativity through education – A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 2(3), 149–155. doi:10.4236/ce.2011.23021
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. C., & Lin, H. S. (2014). Primary teachers’ beliefs about scientific creativity in the classroom context. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1551–1567. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.868619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575. doi:10.1086/444197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments ( OECD Education Working Papers, No. 86). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, R., & Nicholl, B. (2012). Creativity in crisis in design & technology: Are classroom climates conducive for creativity in English secondary schools? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullet, D. R., Wilkerson, A., Lamb, K. N., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1999). All our futures: Creativity, Culture, and Education. London, UK: DFEE. Retrieved from: http://sirkenrobinson.com/pdf/allourfutures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Gifted Children & Council for Exceptional Children (2013). NAGC-CEC teacher preparation standards in gifted and talented education. Retrieved from: http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/NAGC-%20CEC%20CAEP%20standards%20%282013%20final%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Professional Teaching Standards. (2012). Middle childhood generalist standards: For teachers of students ages 7-12, 3rd ed. Accessed 15 July 2021. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/MC-GEN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Education Association (n.d.). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “four Cs.” Retrieved from Author www.nea.org
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (2013, December 16). What is innovation? —Science of innovation [ video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UR83B1UuzCYPlucker,
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–97. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D., Schreiber, F. J., Jacobs, J., Briggs, C., Gubbins, E. J., & Muller, L. (2005). The schoolwide enrichment model reading study. (Research Monograph 05214). The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented website https://nrcgt.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/953/2015/04/rm05214.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Research related to the schoolwide enrichment triad model. Gifted Education International, 18(1), 15–39. doi:10.1177/026142940301800104
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the illusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4), 147–156. doi:10.1177/001698628202600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Beghetto, R. A., Brandon, L. E., & Karwowski, M. (2021). Development of an instrument to measure opportunities for imagination, creativity, and innovation (ICI) in schools. Gifted Education International. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211042333
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & D’Sousa, S. (2014). Intelligences outside the normal curve: Co-cognitive factors that contribute to the creation of social capital and leadership skills in young people. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (2nd ed., pp. 343–361). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2014). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real-world, student-driven learning (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Waicunas, N. (2016). An infusion-based approach to enriching the standards-driven curriculum. In S. M. Reis (Ed.), Reflections on gifted education: Critical works by Joseph S. Renzulli and colleagues (pp. 411–428). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robelen, E. W. (2012, February 2). States mulling creativity indexes for schools. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/02/02/19creativity_ep.h31.html
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students’ achievement? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 47–72. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S., Pan, W., & Wang, L. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 989–1004. doi:10.1037/a0019507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7. doi:10.1177/2345678906293042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, T. B. L., Ho, T. H., Mackenzie, S. V., & Le, L. K. (2017). Developing assessment criteria of a lesson for creativity to promote teaching for creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Patent and Trademark Office (2013). Science of innovation video series. What is innovation? Retrieved from http://www.uspto.gov/about/offices/ous/education/Science_of_Innovation_yt.jsp
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (2018). Public school data search. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Yi, X., Hu, W., Plucker, J. A., & McWilliams, J. (2013). Is there a developmental slump in creativity in China? The relationship between organizational climate and creativity development in Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 22–40. doi:10.1002/jocb.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar