The Effects of Environmental Scene and Body Posture on Embodied Strategies in Creative Thinking

References

• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 13(2), 153–158. doi:10.1037/aca0000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar, S., Runco, M. A., & Park, H. (2020). What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 14(1), 39–49. doi:10.1037/aca0000256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andolfi, V. R., Di Nuzzo, C., & Antonietti, A. (2017). Opening the mind through the body: The effects of posture on creative processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 20–28. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2015). Situated conceptualization: Theory and applications. In Y. Coello & M. H. Fischer (Eds.), Perceptual and emotional embodiment (pp. 19–45). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., & Prinz, J. J. (1997). Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 267–307). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. (2020). MuMIn: multi-model inference. In https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Johnson, D. R. (2021). Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance. Behavior Research Methods, 53(2), 757–780. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01453-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1–12. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., & Fink, A. (2019). Toward a neurocognitive framework of creative cognition: The role of memory, attention, and cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, I116–122. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodeur, M. B., Guérard, K., & Bouras, M. (2014). Bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS) phase II: 930 new normative photos. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e106953. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–20. doi:10.5334/joc.10
   Google Scholar
• Camarda, A., Salvia, E., Vidal, J., Weil, B., Poirel, N., Houde, O., … Cassotti, M. (2018). Neural basis of functional fixedness during creative idea generation: An EEG study. Neuropsychologia, 118, 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G. (2019). Creativity in and out of (cognitive) control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 94–99. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(2), 81–89. doi:10.1080/17588928.2013.768221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G., Weber, M. J., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control. Neuropsychologia, 62, 341–355. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, B., Bartesaghi, N., Simonelli, L., & Antonietti, A. (2015). The combined effects of neurostimulation and priming on creative thinking. A preliminary tDCS study on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [Original Research]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 403. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominey, P. F., Prescott, T. J., Bohg, J., Engel, A. K., Gallagher, S., Heed, T., … Schwartz, A. (2016). Implications of action-oriented paradigm shifts in cognitive science. In A. K. Engel, K. J. Friston, & D. Kragic (Eds.), The pragmatic turn: Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science (pp. 333–356). Cambridge, MA, USA: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715–734. doi:10.1002/hrm.20454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., & Doherty, M. (2021). Measuring originality with human raters and text-mining models: A psychometric comparison of methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 15(4), 645–663. doi:10.1037/aca0000319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i–113. doi:10.1037/h0093599
   Google Scholar
• Frith, E., Miller, S., & Loprinzi, P. D. (2020). A Review of experimental research on embodied creativity: Revisiting the mind–body connection. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 767–798. doi:10.1002/jocb.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (2003). An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(2), 123–144. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00244-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilhooly, K., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98(4), 611–625. doi:10.1348/096317907X173421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 379–401. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-space models of semantic representation from a cognitive perspective: A discussion of common misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1006–1033. doi:10.1177/1745691619861372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsband, U., Schmitt, J., Weyers, M., Binkofski, F., Grützner, G., & Freund, H.-J. (2001). Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: A perspective on apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 39(2), 200–216. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00088-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, N., Xue, H., Yuan, H., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Enhancing creativity: Proper body posture meets proper emotion. Acta Psychologica, 173, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, N., Yuan, H., Hu, Y., & Grabner, R. H. (2014). Interaction effect of body position and arm posture on creative thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 261–265. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2016). Conceptual expansion during divergent thinking Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2017). Tracking the dynamics of divergent thinking via semantic distance: Analytic methods and theoretical implications. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 233–244. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0659-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalénine, S., Shapiro, A. D., Flumini, A., Borghi, A. M., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2014). Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 645–651. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0536-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N. (2018). Going the extra creative mile: The role of semantic distance in creativity – Theory, research, and measurement. In R. E. Jung & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 233–248). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N. (2019). What can quantitative measures of semantic distance tell us about creativity? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., & Faust, M. (2019). A semantic network cartography of the creative mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(4), 271–274. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Kraemer, D. J. M., Alfred, K. L., Colaizzi, G. A., Cortes, R. A., & Green, A. E. (2020). Developing a neurally informed ontology of creativity measurement. NeuroImage, 221, 117166. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Rosen, D. S., Tamez, E. R., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2021). Noninvasive brain stimulation to lateral prefrontal cortex alters the novelty of creative idea generation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(2), 311–326. doi:10.3758/s13415-021-00869-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2020). Novel conceptual combination can dynamically reconfigure semantic memory networks. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/crp47
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2015). Physical activity benefits creativity: Squeezing a ball for enhancing creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 328–333. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1087258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2018). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. In https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (Version R package version 1.5.1)
   Google Scholar
• Leung, A. K.-Y., Kim, S., Polman, E., Ong, L. S., Qiu, L., Goncalo, J. A., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2012). Embodied metaphors and creative “acts.” Psychological Science, 23(5), 502–509. doi:10.1177/0956797611429801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubart, T., & Thornhill-Miller, B. (2019). Creativity: An overview of the 7C’s of creative thought. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Funke (Eds.), The psychology of human thought: An introduction (pp. 277–305). Heidelberg University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Madore, K. P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Creativity and memory: Effects of an episodic-specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1461–1468. doi:10.1177/0956797615591863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, H. E., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). Embodiment and grounding in cognitive neuroscience. In S. L. Thompson-Schill (Ed.), The stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (Vol. 4, pp. 357–383). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Matheson, H. E., Garcea, F. E., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2021). Scene context shapes category representational geometry during processing of tools. Cortex, 141, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matheson, H. E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2020). The role of the motor system in generating creative thoughts. NeuroImage, 213, 116697. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, H. E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2021). A novel coding scheme for assessing responses in divergent thinking: An embodied approach. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 15(3), 412–425. doi:10.1037/aca0000297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, H. E., White, N., & McMullen, P. (2015). Accessing embodied object representations from vision: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 511–524. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/bul0000001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, K., & Damasio, A. (2009). Convergence and divergence in a neural architecture for recognition and memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(7), 376–382. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2022). Can sitting postures influence the creative mind? Positive effect of contractive posture on convergent-integrative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2072557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murali, S., & Händel, B. (2022). Motor restrictions impair divergent thinking during walking and during sitting. Psychological Research, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastase, S. A., Connolly, A. C., Oosterhof, N. N., Halchenko, Y. O., Guntupalli, J. S., Visconti Di Oleggio Castello, M., … Haxby, J. V. (2017). Attention selectively reshapes the geometry of distributed semantic representation. Cerebral Cortex, 27(8), 4277–4291. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostarek, M., & Bottini, R. (2021). Towards strong inference in research on embodiment–possibilities and limitations of causal paradigms. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 1–21. doi:10.5334/joc.139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prinz, J. J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2002). Acquisition and productivity in perceptual symbol. In T. Dartnall (Ed.), Creativity, cognition, and knowledge: An interaction (pp. 105–138). Connecticut, USA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Rastelli, C., Greco, A., Kenett, Y. N., Finocchiaro, C., & De Pisapia, N. (2022). Simulated visual hallucinations in virtual reality enhance cognitive flexibility. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 4027. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08047-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Pfeiffer, C., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Body schematics: On the role of the body schema in embodied lexical–semantic representations. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 774–781. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruotolo, F., Iachini, T., Ruggiero, G., Scotto Di Tella, G., Ott, L., & Bartolo, A. (2021). The role of mental imagery in pantomimes of actions towards and away from the body. Psychological Research, 85(4), 1408–1417. doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01359-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). Fluid movement and creativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 625–629. doi:10.1037/a0027395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanciu, M. M. (2015). Embodied creativity: A critical analysis of an underdeveloped subject. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 312–317. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.058
   Google Scholar
• Steidle, A., & Werth, L. (2013). Freedom from constraints: Darkness and dim illumination promote creativity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 67–80. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stella, M., & Kenett, Y. N. (2019). Viability in multiplex lexical networks and machine learning characterizes human creativity. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 3(3), 45. doi:10.3390/bdcc3030045
   Google Scholar
• van Hooijdonk, M., Ritter, S. M., Linka, M., & Kroesbergen, E. (2022). Creativity and change of context: The influence of object-context (in) congruency on cognitive flexibility. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101044.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, C. E., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2014). Uncovering the architecture of action semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1832. doi:10.1037/a0037449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1015–1027. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, H., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2018). Interactive effect of motivational motor action and emotion on divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 93–98. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar