Creativity with 6 Degrees of Freedom: Feasibility Study of Visual Creativity Assessment in Virtual Reality

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: update to ‘the social psychology of creativity’. Vol. xviii. Westview Press. http://apa.org/psycinfo/1996-97996-000
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. doi:10.1007/BF02293814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avitia, M. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Beyond g and c: the relationship of rated creativity to long-term storage and retrieval (Glr). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 293. doi:10.1037/a0036772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: the amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163. doi:10.1080/02783190509554310
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113–117. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Riggs, M. (2009). Brief report: rater-domain interactions in the consensual assessment technique. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19(2), 87–92.
   Google Scholar
• Barbot, B. (2019). Measuring creativity change and development. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 203–210. doi:10.1037/aca0000232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B. (2020). Creativity and self-esteem in adolescence: a study of their domain-specific, multivariate relationships. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 279–292. doi:10.1002/jocb.365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B. (2021). The intertwined development of identity and creativity: immersing in the digital self. In S. W. Russ, J. Hoffmann, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of lifespan development of creativity (Cambridge handbooks in psychology) (pp. 159–175). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., Hass, R. W., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Creativity assessment in psychological research: (re) setting the standards. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 233–240. doi:10.1037/aca0000233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., & Heuser, B. (2017). Creativity and identity formation in adolescence: A developmental perspective. In The creative self: effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 87–98). Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00005-4
   Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). What makes immersive virtual reality the ultimate empathy machine? Discerning the underlying mechanisms of change. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106431. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2012). Creative thinking in music: its nature and assessment through musical exploratory behaviors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(3), 231–242. doi:10.1037/a0027307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., Orriols, E., & Pouyade, H. (2008). Consensual assessment technique-interface (CAT-i). Copyrights Cat-i. Org.
   Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., Tan, M., Randi, J., Santa-Donato, G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Essential skills for creative writing: integrating multiple domain-specific perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 209–223. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brivio, E., Serino, S., Negro Cousa, E., Zini, A., Riva, G., & De Leo, G. (2020). Virtual reality and 360° panorama technology: A media comparison to study changes in sense of presence, anxiety, and positive emotions. Virtual Reality, 25(2), 303–311. doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00453-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., & Hansen, M. (2013). Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(2), 245–276. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02050.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: a multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(1), 1–29. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i06
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Kao, J. -Y., & Wang, Y. -Y. (2022). Influences of virtual reality on design creativity and design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101127. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. -C., Chang, Y. -S., & Chuang, M. -J. (2022). Virtual reality application influences cognitive load-mediated creativity components and creative performance in engineering design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 6–18. doi:10.1111/jcal.12588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, I. L. (1964). Observations on the meaning of some measures of esthetic sensitivity. The Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 49–64. doi:10.1080/00223980.1964.9916671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2015). Teaching engineers to think creatively. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 402–410). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cseh, G. M., & Jeffries, K. K. (2019). A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the consensual assessment technique for creativity research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 159. doi:10.1037/aca0000220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y., & Mühlberger, A. (2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, A. L., Andrade, A., Soares, L., & I Badia, S. B. (2016). Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living: A randomized controlled trial with stroke patients. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 13(1), 96. doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0204-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2014). The creative class and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 196–205. doi:10.1177/0891242414541693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgeard, M. J. (2013). Perceiving benefits after adversity: the relationship between self-reported posttraumatic growth and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 245. doi:10.1037/a0031223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgeard, M. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 250. doi:10.1037/aca0000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., Reeve, S., Robinson, A., Ehlers, A., Clark, D., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2017). Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychological Medicine, 47(14), 1–8. doi:10.1017/S003329171700040X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich, T., Alexandrovsky, D., Stabbert, T., Döring, T., & Malaka, R. (2018). VRBox: a virtual reality augmented sandbox for immersive playfulness, creativity and exploration. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 153–162. 10.1145/3242671.3242697
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, G. (2020). Measuring creativity with planned missing data. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 150–164. doi:10.1002/jocb.352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Revisiting the “art bias” in lay conceptions of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 11–20. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.873656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalo, J. A., Vincent, L. C., & Krause, V. (2015). The liberating consequences of creative work: how a creative outlet lifts the physical burden of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, K. O. (1985). VAST: visual aesthetic sensitivity test (4th ed.). Concept Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Graessler, I., & Taplick, P. (2019). Supporting creativity with virtual reality technology. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 2011–2020. doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.207
   Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L. (2019). Creativity in digital reality/creatividad en la realidad digital. Studies in Psychology, 40(3), 585–607. doi:10.1080/02109395.2019.1660122
   Google Scholar
• Groyecka-Bernard, A., Karwowski, M., & Sorokowski, P. (2021). Creative thinking components as tools for reducing prejudice: evidence from experimental studies on adolescents. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100779. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J. -Q., Wang, L. -H., Chen, Q., Jin, K., & Hwang, G. -J. (2021). Effects of a virtual reality-based pottery making approach on junior high school students’ creativity and learning engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–17. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1871631
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2009). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2016). Creativity in the age of technology: measuring the digital creativity of millennials. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 149–153. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1162515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., Kaufman, J. C., Baker, B. S., Patterson, J. D., Barbot, B., Green, A. E., … Beaty, R. E. (2022). Divergent semantic integration (DSI): extracting creativity from narratives with distributional semantic modeling. Behavior Research Methods. doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01986-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). Meaning-making through creativity during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 189. doi:10.1037/a0020133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Why creativity isn’t in IQ tests, why it matters, and why it won’t change anytime soon probably. Journal of Intelligence, 3(3), 59–72. doi:10.3390/jintelligence3030059
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 734–749. doi:10.1177/1745691618771981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 83–91. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.649237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the consensual assessment technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(4), 223–233. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 171–178. doi:10.1080/10400410802059929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: how much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 332–340. doi:10.1037/a0034809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Silvia, P., Kaufman, J. C., Ramesh, S., & Feist, G. J. (2016). Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), 294–307. doi:10.1002/jocb.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: new evidence of reliability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 96–106. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., Seidel, A., ElBassiouny, A., Mark, Y., & Owen, D. R. (2010). Visual selection contributes to artists’ advantages in realistic drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 93–102. doi:10.1037/a0017657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. W., & Lee, P. Y. (2015). The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(1), 3–18. doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.745426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Du, X., Ma, H., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). The effect of virtual-reality-based restorative environments on creativity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 19. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. -W., & Chalmers, R. P. (2018). Fitting item response unfolding models to likert-scale data using mirt in R. PLoS One, 13(5), 1–22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria, S. R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Examining the relationship between creativity and equitable thinking in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 54(10), 1279–1284. doi:10.1002/pits.22076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, L. E., Wanschura, P. B., Battaglia, M. M., Howell, S. N., & Flinn, J. M. (2015). Participation in active singing leads to cognitive improvements in individuals with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63(4), 815–816. doi:10.1111/jgs.13366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1982). A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, O., Korhonen, A., Pöyry, E., Hauru, K., Holopainen, J., & Parvinen, P. (2020). Restoration in a virtual reality forest environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106295. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, M., Unternaehrer, E., Schorpp, S. M., Wenzel, M., Benz, A., Bentele, U. U., … Prüssner, J. C. (2020). The opposite of stress: the relationship between vagal tone, creativity, and divergent thinking. Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 150–159. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(1), 59–71. doi:10.1177/014662169001400106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E., & Muraki, M. (2016). Generalized partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory, volume one: models (1st ed., pp. 127–137). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N. (2019a). The first glance is the weakest: “Tasteful” individuals are slower to judge visual art. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 188–195. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N. (2019b). Development of the R library ‘jrt’: automated item response theory procedures for judgment data and their application with the consensual assessment technique. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. doi:10.1037/aca0000287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N. (2020). Aesthetic sensitivity. In M. Nadal & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The oxford handbook of empirical aesthetics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198824350.013.40
   Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., Çelik, P., & Storme, M. (2020). Commentary on Corradi et al.’s (2019) new conception of aesthetic sensitivity: is the ability conception dead? British Journal of Psychology, 111(4), 659–662. doi:10.1111/bjop.12440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., & Storme, M. (2017). Measuring “Good Taste” with the visual aesthetic sensitivity test-revised (VAST-R). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., & Storme, M. (2019a). Judge response theory? A call to upgrade our psychometrical account of creativity judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 167. doi:10.1037/aca0000225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., & Storme, M. (2019b). Judge response theory? A call to upgrade our psychometrical account of creativity judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 167–175. doi:10.1037/aca0000225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., & Zenasni, F. (2016). Order in complexity: how Hans Eysenck brought differential psychology and aesthetics together. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 156–162. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2014). Is visual aesthetic sensitivity independent from intelligence, personality and creativity? Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 16–20. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., & Zenasni, F. (2016). Individual differences in aesthetic ability: the case for an aesthetic quotient. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(750). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00750
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson, J., & Guegan, J. (2019). “I’d like to be under the sea”: contextual cues in virtual environments influence the orientation of idea generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nering, M. L., & Ostini, R. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of polytomous item response theory models (1 ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Obeid, S., & Demirkan, H. (2020). The influence of virtual reality on design process creativity in basic design studios. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1858116
   Google Scholar
• Patz, R., Grzymala, M., & Gengnagel, C. (2019). Bodily design processes in immersive virtual environments. Design Modelling Symposium Berlin, 350–359.
   Google Scholar
• Pelowski, M., Leder, H., & Tinio, P. P. (2017). Creativity in the visual arts. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 80–109). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, J., & Blackburn, K. (2013). The priming effects of virtual environments on interpersonal perceptions and behaviors. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 703–720. doi:10.1111/jcom.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., & Seagal, J. D. (1999). Forming a story: the health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(10), 1243–1254. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:10<1243:AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., Temple, J. S., & Qian, M. (2009). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology & Marketing, 26(5), 470–478. doi:10.1002/mar.20283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primi, R., Silvia, P. J., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2019). Applying many-facet rasch modeling in the assessment of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 176–186. doi:10.1037/aca0000230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R. B., Strick, M., Derks, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 961–964. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. O., Cha, R. H., Mielke, M. M., Geda, Y. E., Boeve, B. F., Machulda, M. M., … Petersen, R. C. (2015). Risk and protective factors for cognitive impairment in persons aged 85 years and older. Neurology, 84(18), 1854–1861. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robitzsch, A., & Steinfeld, J. (2018). Item response models for human ratings: overview, estimation methods, and implementation in R. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 60(1), 101–139.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, R. S., Baughman, S. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2013). Virtual superheroes: using superpowers in virtual reality to encourage prosocial behavior. PLoS One, 8(1), e55003. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Abdullah, A. M. (2014). Why isn’t creativity being supported? Distressing analyses of grants and awards for creativity research–or lack thereof. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 248–250. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Barbot, B. (2020). Does the fourth-grade slump in creativity actually exist? A meta-analysis of the development of divergent thinking in school-age children and adolescents. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 275–298. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09547-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34(1), 1–97. doi:10.1007/BF03372160
   Google Scholar
• Schöne, B., Sylvester, R. S., Radtke, E. L., & Gruber, T. (2020). Sustained inattentional blindness in virtual reality and under conventional laboratory conditions. Virtual Reality, 25(1), 209–216. doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00450-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sica, L. S., Ragozini, G., Palma, T. D., & Sestito, L. A. (2019). Creativity as identity skill? Late adolescents’ management of identity, complexity and risk-taking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 457–471. doi:10.1002/jocb.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2009). Genius 101. Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US patent office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 97–106. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C., Mao, S., Naumann, S. E., & Xing, Z. (2022). Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101032. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M., Mourgues, C., Hein, S., MacCormick, J., Barbot, B., & Grigorenko, E. (2015). Differences in judgments of creativity: how do academic domain, personality, and self-reported creativity influence novice judges’ evaluations of creative productions? Journal of Intelligence, 3(3), 73–90. doi:10.3390/jintelligence3030073
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. L., & Barbot, B. (2021). Dual pathways in creative writing processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. 10.1037/aca0000415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. L., Kaufman, J. C., & Barbot, B. (2021). Measuring creative writing with the storyboard task: the role of effort and story length. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 476–488. doi:10.1002/jocb.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, M., McGillivray, J., Youssef, G. J., McCarthy, M. C., & Clark, T. -J. (2020). Feasibility, acceptability, and clinical implementation of an immersive virtual reality intervention to address psychological well-being in children and adolescents with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 37(4), 265–277. doi:10.1177/1043454220917859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J. -M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walberg, H. J. (1988). Creativity and talent as learning. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 340–361). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. -Y., Weng, T. -H., Tsai, I. -F., Kao, J. -Y., & Chang, Y. -S. (in press). Effects of virtual reality on creativity performance and perceived immersion: A study of brain waves. British Journal of Educational Technology. n/a(n/a. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Sonneborn, M. (2009). Creative expression in virtual worlds: imitation, imagination, and individualized collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(4), 211–221. doi:10.1037/a0016297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B., & Sonneborn, M. S. (2011). Creative expression in virtual worlds: imitation, imagination, and individualized collaboration. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(S), 32–47. doi:10.1037/2160-4134.1.S.32
   Google Scholar
• Wojtczuk, A., & Bonnardel, N. (2011). Designing and assessing everyday objects: impact of externalisation tools and judges’ backgrounds. Interacting with Computers, 23(4), 337–345. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. doi:10.1177/0013164413495237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Lin, L., Cheng, P. -Y., Yang, X., Ren, Y., & Huang, Y. -M. (2018). Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1231–1254. doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9604-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedelius, C. M., Mills, C., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). Beyond subjective judgments: predicting evaluations of creative writing from computational linguistic features. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 879–894. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1137-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar