Exploring the Creative Personality: Using Machine Learning to Predict Fluency and Originality in Divergent Thinking

References

• Acar, S., Berthiaume, K., Grajzel, K., Dumas, D., Flemister, C. “., & Organisciak, P. (2023). Applying automated originality scoring to the verbal form of Torrance tests of creative thinking. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211061874
   Google Scholar
• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, A., Hansen, C. B., & Schaffer, M. E. (2020). LASSOPACK: Stata module for lasso, square-root lasso, elastic net, ridge, adaptive lasso estimation and cross-validation. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s458458.html
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health; origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, D., & Schendan, H. E. (2019). Sensitive individuals are more creative. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1996). Mood and personality in adulthood. In C. Magai & S. H. McFadden (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, adult development, and aging (pp. 369–383). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012464995-8/50021-2
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, K. N., Ivcevic, Z., & Moeller, J. (2020). Person-oriented profiles of originality and fluency in divergent thinking responses. Journal of Research in Personality, 86, 103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmen-Wassenberg, P., Kämmerle, M., Unterrainer, H.-F., & Fink, A. (2016). The relation between different facets of creativity and the dark side of personality. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1125267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Doherty, M., & Dong, Y. (2022). To map or not to map: Professional actors are capable of validly connecting extremely distant verbal analogues. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Understanding fluency and originality: A latent variable perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Forthmann, B., & Alexander, P. (2024). Using a model of domain learning to understand the development of creativity. Educational Psychologist, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2291577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., & Doherty, M. (2021). Measuring divergent thinking originality with human raters and text-mining models: A psychometric comparison of methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., Maio, S., & Doherty, M. (2021). Four text-mining methods for measuring elaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayn, K., MacCann, C., Tiliopoulos, N., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Aesthetic emotions and aesthetic people: Openness predicts sensitivity to novelty in the experiences of interest and pleasure. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis-Olivarius, M., & Christensen, B. T. (2019). Not quite equal odds: Openness to experience moderates the relation between quantity and quality of ideas in divergent production. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2015). The bright and dark side correlates of creativity: Demographic, ability, personality traits and personality disorders associated with divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.992676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grajzel, K., Acar, S., & Singer, G. (2023). The big five and divergent thinking: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 214, 112338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gute, G., Gute, D. S., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The early lives of highly creative persons: The influence of the complex family. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), The systems model of creativity: the collected works of mihaly csikszentmihalyi (pp. 293–317). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_18
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2000). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudek, S. du Toit, and D. Sorbom (Eds.), Factor analysis and structural equation modeling: a festschrift in honor of Karl joreskog (pp. 196–210). Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Helson, R. (1999). A longitudinal study of creative personality in women. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1202_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W. K. B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality? European Journal of Personality, 8(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobucci, R., Grimm, K. J., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Machine learning for social and behavioral research. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, Ø. L. (2011). The creative personality: A synthesis and development of the creative person profile. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.595656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, Ø. L., Arnulf, J. K., Furnham, A., & Lang-Ree, O. C. (2019). Narcissism and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. M. (2015). Using lasso for predictor selection and to assuage overfitting: A method long overlooked in behavioral sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(5), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1036965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleynick, V. C., DeYoung, C. G., Hyde, E., Kaufman, S. B., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2017). Openness/intellect: The core of the creative personality. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 9–27). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.002
   Google Scholar
• Organisciak, P., Acar, S., Dumas, D., & Berthiaume, K. (2023). Beyond semantic distance: Automated scoring of divergent thinking greatly improves with large language models. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisciak, P., Dumas, D., Acar, S., & de Chantal, P. L. (2024). Open creativity scoring. Computer software. University of Denver. https://openscoring.du.edu
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: The case of creativity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19(2), 27.
   Google Scholar
• Shafir, T., Orkibi, H., Baker, F. A., Gussak, D., & Kaimal, G. (2020). The state of the art in creative arts therapies. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. B., & Webster, B. D. (2018). Narcissus the innovator? The relationship between grandiose narcissism, innovation, and adaptability. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2021). Stata 17 base reference manual. Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepper, T., & Schoenewolf, G. (2018). Psychotherapy with people in the arts: Nurturing creativity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315786070
   Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O., Wertz, C. J., Flores, R. A., Beatty, E. L., Smith, I., Blackler, K., Lam, Q., & Jung, R. E. (2018). Structural correlates of openness and intellect: Implications for the contribution of personality to creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 39(7), 2987–2996. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosburg, S. K. (1998). Mood and the quantity and quality of ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1104_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., Steger, D., Kaur, Y., Hildebrandt, A., Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2021). On the trail of creativity: Dimensionality of divergent thinking and its relation with cognitive abilities, personality, and insight. European Journal of Personality, 35(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar