How Does Narrow AI Impact Human Creativity?

References

• ACARA. (2010). The shape of the National curriculum. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Johnson, D. R. (2021). Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance. Behavior Research Methods, 53(2), 757–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can language models be too big? [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. The Journal of General Psychology, 39(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2016). Where machines could replace humans - and where they can’t (yet). McKinsey Quarterly(July) (pp. 1–12). https://www.mckinsey.de/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/Where%20machines%20could%20replace%20humans%20and%20where%20they%20cant/Where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for education and organizations. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2015). Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2020). Engineering: The ultimate expression of creativity? In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3 ed. Vol. 1, pp. 434–439). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2023). Is artificial intelligence more creative than humans? ChatGPT and the divergent association task. Learning Letters, 1(8), 13–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2021). Core capabilities for Industry 4.0 - Foundation of the cyber-psychology of engineering. Wbv Media.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2011). Measuring creativity for innovation management. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000300002
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H., Madeiros, K., & Demadzic, A. (2022). The intersection of human and artificial creativity. In D. Henriksen & P. Mishra (Eds.), Creative provocations: Speculations on the future of creativity, technology & learning (pp. 19–34). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H., & Marrone, R. L. (2022). Automated scoring of figural creativity using a convolutional neural network. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Understanding fluency and originality: A latent variable perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., & Forster, E. (2009). Creativity evaluation through latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 31, No. 31).
   Google Scholar
• Forum, W. E. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Revisiting the “art bias” in lay conceptions of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guckelsberger, C., Salge, C., & Colton, S. (2017). Addressing the” why?” in computational creativity: A non-anthropocentric, minimal model of intentional creative agency [ Paper presentation]. 8th International Conference on Computational Creativity, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 142–161). Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Harbinson, J., & Haarman, H. (2014). Automated scoring of originality using semantic representations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society,36(36).
   Google Scholar
• Jellen, H. G., & Urban, K. K. (1986). The TCT-DP (test for creative thinking-drawing production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., & Iziev, N. (2022, April 15). AI is mastering language. Should we trust what it says? New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Kalish, S., & Lilien, G. L. (1986). A market entry timing model for new technologies. Management Science, 32(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalkov, A., Paaßen, B., Segal, A., Pinkwart, N., & Gal, K. (2021). Automatic creativity measurement in scratch programs across modalities. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(6), 740–753.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Creative Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Marrone, R., Cropley, D. H., & Wang, Z. (2023). Automatic assessment of mathematical creativity using natural language processing. Creativity Research Journal, 35(4), 661–676.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, K. E., Marrone, R. L., Joksimovic, S., Cropley, D. H., & Siemens, G. (2023). Promises and realities of artificial creativity. In S. Hunter & R. Reiter-Palmon (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (2nd ed, 275–289). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534380
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J. A., Nahas, J., Chmoulevitch, D., Cropper, S. J., & Webb, M. E. (2021). Naming unrelated words predicts creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(25). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022340118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppert, M. L., Dollard, M. F., Murugavel, V. R., Reiter-Palmon, R., Reardon, A., Cropley, D. H., & O’Keeffe, V. (2022). A mixed-methods study of creative problem solving and psychosocial safety climate: Preparing engineers for the future of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759226
   Google Scholar
• Patston, T. J., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity: Is there an arts bias? Teaching & Teacher Education, 75, 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-009
   Google Scholar
• Puente-Díaz, R. (2023). Metacognitive feelings as a source of information for the creative process: A conceptual exploration. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, J., & Partridge, D. (1993). Creativity: A survey of AI approaches. Artificial Intelligence Review, 7(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849197
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajja, P. S. (2021). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Illustrated Computational Intelligence: Examples and Applications, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9589-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2021). The iterative and improvisational nature of the creative process. Journal of Creativity, 31, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jyoc.2021.1000002
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. R., Joshi, D., Huet, B., Hsu, W., & Cota, J. (2017). Harnessing A.I. for augmenting creativity: Application to movie trailer creation. Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 1799–1808). https://doi.org/10.1145/3123266.3127906
   Google Scholar
• Takiddin, A., Schneider, J., Yang, Y., Abd-Alrazaq, A., & Househ, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence for skin cancer detection: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(11), e22934. https://doi.org/10.2196/22934
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The Nature of Creativity, 43–75.
   Google Scholar
• Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Burkhardt, J., Bonnardel, N., Corazza, G. E., Glăveanu, V., Hanchett Hanson, M., Ivcevic, Z., Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J. C., Okada, T., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Gaggioli, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence & creativity: A manifesto for collaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.597
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 327–451. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. A. (2006). Searching for computational creativity. New Generation Computing, 24(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., Scalise, K., & Gochyyev, P. (2015). Rethinking ICT literacy: From computer skills to social network settings. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., Qiu, J., Hua, K., Su, W., Wu, J., Xu, H., Han, Y., Fu, C., Yin, Z., Liu, M., … Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4), 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar