Socket Interface Pressure and Amputee Reported Outcomes for Comfortable and Uncomfortable Conditions of Patellar Tendon Bearing Socket: A Pilot Study

References

• Bergstrom, N. (2005). Patients at risk for pressure ulcers and evidence-based care for pressure ulcer prevention. In D. Bader, C. Bouten, D. Colin & C. Oomens (eds.), Pressure ulcer research current and future perspective (pp. 37). Berlin, Germany: Springer, 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M.J., Machin, D., & Walters, S.J. (2007). Medical statistics: a textbook for the health sciences. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Deans, S.A., McFadyen, A.K., & Rowe, P.J. (2008). Physical activity and quality of life: A study of a lower-limb amputee population. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 32(2), 186–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton, T., Buis, A.W., McFadyen, A., McHugh, B.F., McKay, G., Murray, K.D., & Sexton, S. (2009). Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 46(3), 405–415.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, D.J., & Nielsen, J.P. (1993). Clinical assessment of human gait. Journal of Prosthetics & Orthotics, 5(2), 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Friel, K. (2005). Componentry for lower extremity prostheses. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 13(5), 326–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, P., & MacLachlan, M. (2000). Development and psychometric evaluation of the trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales (TAPES). Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 130–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordois, A., Scuffham, P., Shearer, A., Oglesby, A., & Tobian, J.A. (2003). The health care costs of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the US. Diabetes Care, 26(6), 1790–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspal, R.S., Fisher, K., & Nieveen, R. (2003). Prosthetic socket fit comfort score. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(22), 1278–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jude, E.B., Oyibo, S.O., Chalmers, N., & Boulton, A.J. (2001). Peripheral arterial disease in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: a comparison of severity and outcome. Diabetes Care, 24(8), 1433–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W.D., Lim, D., & Hong, K.S. (2003). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the patellar tendon bar in the trans-tibial patellar-tendon-bearing prosthesis socket. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 27(1), 23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C.H., & Li-Tsang, C.W. (2009). Validation of the Pliance X System in measuring interface pressure generated by pressure garment. Burns, 35(6), 845–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W.C., Zhang, M., & Mak, A.F. (2005). Regional differences in pain threshold and tolerance of the transtibial residual limb: including the effects of age and interface material. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(4), 641–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro, M.W., Reiber, G., del Aguila, M., Ajax, M.J., Boone, D.A., Larsen, J.A., … Sangeorzan, B. (1999). Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 36(3), 155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, A.F., Zhang, M., & Boone, D.A. (2001). State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 38(2), 161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazaheri, M., Fardipour, S., Salavati, M., Hadadi, M., Negahban, H., Bahramizadeh, M., & Khosrozadeh, F. (2011). The Persian version of Trinity Amputation and Prosthetics Experience Scale: translation, factor structure, reliability and validity. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(19–20), 1737–1745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbelt, H.E., Dijkstra, P.U., Jonkman, M.F., & Geertzen, J.H. (2006). Skin problems in lower limb amputees: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(10), 603–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASDAB. (2009). The Amputee Statistical Database for the United Kingdom 2009/07. Edinburgh: National Amputee Statistical Database (NASDAB).
   Google Scholar
• Polliack, A.A., Craig, D.D., Sieh, R.C., Landsberger, S., & McNeal, D.R. (2002). Laboratory and clinical tests of a prototype pressure sensor for clincial assessment of prosthetic socket fit. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 26(1), 23–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polliack, A.A., Sieh, R.C., Craig, D.D., Landsberger, S., McNeil, D.R., & Ayyappa, E. (2000). Scientific validation of two commercial pressure sensor systems for prosthetic socket fit. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 24(1), 63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, C. W., and J. Foort, (1961), The patellartendon bearing below-knee prosthesis, Biomechanics laboratory, University of California, Berkeley and San Francisco, 8–51.
   Google Scholar
• Safari, M.R., Rowe, P., McFadyen, A., & Buis, A. (2013). Hands-off and hands-on casting consistency of amputee below knee sockets using magnetic resonance imaging. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 486146.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J.E. (2005). Stump-Socket Interface Condition. In D. Bader, C. Bouten, D. Colin & C. Oomens (eds.), Pressure ulcer research current and feature prespectives (pp. 129). Berlin, Germany: Springer, 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J.E., Daly, C.H., & Burgess, E.M. (1993). Clinical measurement of normal and shear stresses on a trans-tibial stump: characteristics of wave-form shapes during walking. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 17(1), 38–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J.E., & Fatone, S. (2011). Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 48(8), 949–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J.E., Fergason, J.R., Zachariah, S.G., & Jacobsen, A.K. (2002). Interface pressure and shear stress changes with amputee weight loss: case studies from two trans-tibial amputee subjects. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 26(3), 243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J.E., Lam, D., Dralle, A.J., & Okumura, R. (1997). Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 34(1), 19–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J.E., Zachariah, S.G., Baker, A.B., Greve, J.M., & Clinton, C. (2000). Effects of changes in cadence, prosthetic componentry, and time on interface pressures and shear stresses of three trans-tibial amputees. Clinical Biomechanics, 15(9), 684–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J.E., Zachariah, S.G., Jacobsen, A.K., & Fergason, J.R. (2005). Changes in interface pressures and shear stresses over time on trans-tibial amputee subjects ambulating with prosthetic limbs: comparison of diurnal and six-month differences. Journal of Biomechanics, 38(8), 1566–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, P., Noroozi, S., Vinney, J., & Andrews, S. (2000). Developments in the trans-tibial prosthetic socket fitting process: a review of past and present research. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 24(2), 97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver-Thorn, M.B., Steege, J.W., & Childress, D.S. (1996). A review of prosthetic interface stress investigations. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 33(3), 253–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S.I., Alimusaj, M., Fradet, L., Siegel, J., & Braatz, F. (2009). Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot. Clinical Biomechanics, 24(10), 860–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Turner-Smith, A.R., Tanner, A., & Roberts, V.C. (1998). Clinical investigation of the pressure and shear stress on the trans-tibial stump with a prosthesis. Medical Engineering & Physics, 20(3), 188–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar