References
- Ahmad, B., Langdon, P., Godsill, S., Hardy, R., Dias, E., & Skrypchuk, L. (2014, September). Interactive displays in vehicles: Improving usability with a pointing gesture tracker and Bayesian intent predictors. Proceedings of Automotive UI, Seattle, WA.
- Asano, T., Sharlin, E., Kitamura, Y., Takashima, K., & Kishino, F. (2005, October). Predictive interaction using the Delphian desktop. Proceedings of the 186th Annual ACM Smposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’05), pp.133–141. New York.
- Baudisch, P. (2009). Facilitating target acquisition by expanding targets. U.S. Patent 7530030 B2.
- Biswas, P., & Langdon, P. (2015). Multimodal intelligent eye-gaze tracking system. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(4), 277–294.
- Biswas, P., & Langdon, P. (2012). Developing multimodal adaptation algorithm for mobility impaired users by evaluating their hand strength. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(9), 576–596. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.636294
- Biswas, P., Robinson, P., & Langdon, P. (2012). Designing inclusive interfaces through user modelling and simulation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(1), 1–33.
- Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189.194: 4–7). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/showciting?cid=179358
- EU GUIDE. (2013). EU GUIDE Project. Retrieved from http://www.guide-project.eu/
- Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391. doi:10.1037/h0055392
- Grossman, T., & Balakrishnan, R. (2005). The bubble cursor: Enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor’s activation area. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05)
- Hart, S. G., & Staveland., L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183.
- Hwang, F., Hollinworth, N., & Williams, N. (2013). Effects of target expansion on selection performance in older computer users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 5(1).
- Keates, S., Hwang, F., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., & Robinson, P. (2002). Cursor measures for motion-impaired computer users. In Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS) (pp. 135–142). New York.
- Langdon, P. M., Godsill, S., & Clarkson, P. J. (2006, September). Statistical estimation of user’s interactions from motion impaired cursor use data. 6th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies (ICDVRAT 2006), Esbjerg, Denmark.
- Lank, E., Cheng, Y. N., & Ruiz, J. (2007, April–May). Endpoint prediction using motion kinematics. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07), pp. 637–646, New York, NY.
- Murata, A. (1998). Improvement of pointing time by predicting targets in pointing with a PC mouse. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 10(1), 23–32. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1001_2
- Ruiz, J., & Lank, E. (2010). Speeding pointing in tiled widgets: Understanding the effects of target expansion and misprediction. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’10) (pp. 229–238). New York, NY: ACM.
- TNR Technologies. (2016). Stressometer Comby™. Retrieved from http://www.tnr.fr/adtm60/pres60en.htm
- Wobbrock, J. O., Fogarty, J., Liu, S., Kimuro, S., & Harada, S. (2009, April). The angle mouse: Target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09), pp. 1401–1410, New York.
- World Health Organization (WHO). (2012). Disability and health. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs352/en/
- Ziebart, B., Dey, A., & Bagnell, J. A. (2012, February). Probabilistic pointing target prediction via inverse optimal control. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’12), Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1–10.