Value-based design for the elderly: An application in the field of mobility aids

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A. I., Hassing, L. B., McClearn, G. E., & Johansson, B. (2006). What matters for life satisfaction in the oldest-old? Aging & Mental Health, 10(3), 257–264. doi:10.1080/13607860500409435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolchini, D., Garzotto, F., & Paolini, P. (2008). Value-driven design for infosuasive web applications. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 745–754). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1367598
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bright, A. K., & Coventry, L. (2013). Assistive technology for older adults: Psychological and socio-emotional design requirements. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments.
   Google Scholar
• Britten, N. (2006). Qualitative research in health care. In Qualitative research in health care (3rd ed., pp. 12–20). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(3), 421–437. doi:10.1348/135910705X53155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockton, G. (2005). A development framework for value-centred design. In Extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05) (pp. 1292–1295). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1056899
   Google Scholar
• De Craen, A. J. M., Westendorp, R. G. J., Willems, C. G., Buskens, I. C. M., & Gussekloo, J. (2006). Assistive devices and community-based services among 85-year-old community-dwelling elderly in the Netherlands: Ownership, use, and need for intervention. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1(3), 199–203. doi:10.1080/17483100612331392835
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gitlin, L. N. (1995). Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, 19(1), 41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300–311. doi:10.1145/3166.3170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggblom-Kronlöf, G., & Sonn, U. (2007). Use of assistive devices—a reality full of contradictions in elderly persons’ everyday life. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(6), 335–345. doi:10.1080/17483100701701672
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedberg-Kristensson, E., Ivanoff, S. D., & Iwarsson, S. (2007). Experiences among older persons using mobility devices. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(1), 15–22. doi:10.1080/17483100600875197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsch, T., Forlizzi, J., Hyder, E., Goetz, J., Stroback, J., & Kurtz, C. (2000). The ELDer project: Social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In CUU ’00 Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability. (pp. 72–79). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/01449290301782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala, S., & Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. (2009). Value of information systems and products: Understanding the users’ perspective and values. Journal Information Technological Theory Applications (JITTA), 9(4), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Kylberg, M., Löfqvist, C., Phillips, J., & Iwarsson, S. (2013). Three very old men’s experiences of mobility device use over time. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(5), 397–405. doi:10.3109/11038128.2013.779321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Grow, S., Yeung, P., Towers, A., Alpass, F., & Stephens, C. (2013). The impact of mobility on quality of life among older persons. Journal of Aging and Health, 25(5), 723–736. doi:10.1177/0898264313490198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping (p. 461). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• McMillen, A.-M., & Söderberg, S. (2002). Disabled person’s experience of dependence on assistive devices. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9(4), 176–183. doi:10.1080/11038120260501208
   Google Scholar
• Mont, O. K. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product–service system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 237–245. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelli, N. (2006). Developing new product service systems (PSS): Methodologies and operational tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1495–1501. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L., Allen, S., Isenstadt, D., Wasserman, M., & Iezzoni, L. (2009). Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: Implications for intervention. Disability and Health Journal, 2(2), 77–85. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudd, J., Stern, K., & Isensee, S. (1996). Low vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions, 3(1), 76–85. doi:10.1145/223500.223514
   Google Scholar
• Satariano, W. A., Guralnik, J. M., Jackson, R. J., Marottoli, R. A., Phelan, E. A., & Prohaska, T. R. (2012). Mobility and aging: New directions for public health action. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1508–1515. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Campen, C. (2011). Kwetsbare ouderen [Frail elderly] (p. 218). Den Haag, the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Van Campen, C., Den Draak, M., & Ras, M. (2011). Kwetsbaar alleen; De toename van het aantal kwetsbare alleenwonende ouderen tot 2030 [Vulnarable living alone; The expected increase of frail elderly living alone until 2030] (p. 10). Den Haag, the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Van Velsen, L., Beaujean, D. J., Wentzel, J., Van Steenbergen, J. E., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2015). Developing requirements for a mobile app to support citizens in dealing with ticks and tick bites via end-user profiling. Health Informatics Journal, 21(1), 24–35. doi:10.1177/1460458213496419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Velsen, L., Wentzel, J., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C. (2013). Designing ehealth that matters via a multidisciplinary requirements development approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2(1), e21.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, R. A., Smith, K. W., Jette, A. M., & Janney, C. A. (1993). The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): Development and evaluation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(2), 153–162. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, J. P., & Faubert, J. (2009). Framing experience: Concept maps, mind maps, and data collection in qualitative research. International Journal Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 68–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wildevuur, S., Dijk, D. V., Äyväri, A., Bjerre, M., Hammer-Jakobsen, T., & Lund, J. (2013). Connect: Design for an empathic society (p. 216). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar