The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders

References

• Berardi, A., De Santis, R., Tofani, M., Márquez, M. A., Santilli, V., Rushton, P. W., … Galeoto, G. (2017). The wheelchair use confidence scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–6. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1357053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, S. Y., & Jo, S. J. (2014). Development and validation of korean version of psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale. Assistive Technology, 26(1), 45–50. doi:10.1080/10400435.2013.796502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, D., Emmel, M. L. G., Manzini, M. G., & Braga Mendes, P. V. (2016). Assistive technology accessibility and abandonment: Challenges for occupational therapists. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 4(1), 10. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1166
   Google Scholar
• Day, H. (1996). Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: The PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Day, H., & Jutai, J. (2003). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) Manual. Ontario, CA: University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Day, H., Jutai, J., Woolrich, W., & Strong, W. H. (2001). The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 400–404. doi:10.1080/09638280010008906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Monette, M., Descent, M., Jutai, J., & Wolfson, C. (2002). The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian–French version. Quality of Life Research, 11(6), 583–592. doi:10.1023/A:1016397412708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development theory and Applications. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., & Borsci, S. (2011). The use and non-use of assistive technology in Italy: Preliminary data. In 11th AAATE Conference: Everyday technology for independence and care. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-814-4-979
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., & Borsci, S. (2016). Providing assistive technology in Italy: The perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(1), 22–31. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.930191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, S., Meloni, F., & Borsci, S. (2016). The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: A survey of national health service users. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 52(4), 516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto, G., De Santis, R., Marcolini, A., Cinelli, A., & Cecchi, R. (2016). Il consenso informato in Terapia Occupazionale: Proposta di una modulistica. Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 38(2), 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto, G., Mollica, R., Astorino, O., & Cecchi, R. (2015). Informed consent in physiotherapy: Proposal of a form. Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 37(4), 245–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. R., & Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh, Y. J., & Lenker, J. A. (2006). The psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1(1–2), 49–57. doi:10.1080/09638280500167217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, 14(3), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Jutai, J., Woolrich, W., Campbell, K., Gryfe, P., & Day, H. (2000). User-caregiver agreement on perceived psychosocial impact of assistive devices. In Proceedings of RESNA (pp. 328–330).
   Google Scholar
• Laake, P., Benestad, H. B., & Olsen, B. R. (Eds.). (2007). Research methodology in the medical and biological sciences. London, UK:Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., & Costa, L. O. (2007). The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 11(4), 245–252. doi:10.1590/S1413-35552007000400002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. B. I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGrawHill Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Orellano, E. M., & Jutai, J. W. (2013). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale (PIADS) for puerto rican assistive technology users. Assistive Technology, 25(4), 194–203. doi:10.1080/10400435.2012.761292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellano-Colón, E. M., Jutai, J., Santiago, A., Torres, V., Benítez, K., & Torres, M. (2016). Assistive technology needs and measurement of the psychosocial impact of assistive technologies for independent living of older hispanics: Lessons learned. Technologies, 4(3), 21. doi:10.3390/technologies4030021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, P. W., Miller, W. C., Lee Kirby, R., Eng, J. J., & Yip, J. (2011). Development and content validation of the wheelchair use confidence scale: A mixed-methods study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(1), 57–66. doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.512970
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakakibara, B. M., Miller, W. C., & Rushton, P. W. (2015). Rasch analyses of the wheelchair use confidence scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(6), 1036–1044. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakakibara, B. M., Miller, W. C., Souza, M., Nikolova, V., & Best, K. L. (2013). Wheelchair skills training to improve confidence with using a manual wheelchair among older adults: A pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(6), 1031–1037. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. L., Lee, H. L., & Fetzer, S. J. (2006). Challenges and strategies of instrument translation. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 28(3), 310–321. doi:10.1177/0193945905284712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels, R., Dijcks, B., Soede, M., Gelderblom, G. J., & De Witte, L. (2003). Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technology and Disability, 15(4), 231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2014). Concept Note: Opening the GATE for assistive health technology: Shifting the paradigm. ( Available on http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/concept_note.pdf, Retrieved from 2 November 2017).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2017). Global priority research agenda for improving access to high-quality affordable assistive technology. ( Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254660/1/WHO-EMP-IAU-2017.02-eng.pdf, Retrieved from 2 November 2017)
   Google Scholar