Scoping review of economic evaluations of assistive technology globally

References

• Al-Oraibi, S., Fordham, R., & Lambert, R. (2012). Impact and economic assessment of assistive technology in care homes in Norfolk, UK. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 6(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17549451211261317
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, R. (2002). The SCAI instrument: Measurement costs of individual assistive technology programmes. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 95–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14303
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., & Moi, M. (1998). A model of cost-outcome analysis for assistive technology. Disability & Rehabilitation, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289809166850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin, H., & Persson, J. (1995). Cost-utility analysis of assistive technologies in the European commission’s tide program. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 11(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462300006899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding,S. (1995). Thought make economics more objective? Feminist Economics, 1(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/714042212
   Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (1996). Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology, 8(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1996.10132268
   Google Scholar
• Dequech, D. (2007). Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477300207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deruyter, F. (1995). Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: Do we understand the commitment? Assistive Technology, 7(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1995.10132246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drummond, M., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G., & Torrance, G. (1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford University Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, M. F., Brandt, A., Luce, B. R., & Rovira, J. (1993). Standardizing economic evaluation methodologies in health care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 9(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462300003007
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer, M. J. (2001). Assistive technology outcomes research: Challenges met and yet unmet. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(7), 528–535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200107000-00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer, M. J. (2007). Assessing the efficacy effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology interventions for enhancing mobility. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 2(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100701374355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galvin, J. C., & Scherer, M. J. (1996). Evaluating, selecting and using appropriate assistive technology. Aspen Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L. P. (2002, January). The assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and costs. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 91–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14302
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, L., Garber, A., Grover, S., & Hlatky, M. (1996). Cost effectiveness of assessment and management of risk factors. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 27, 1020–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, F., & Sprigle, S. (2003). Cost analyses in assistive technology research. Assistive Technology, 15(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2003.10131886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, M. B. (2000). Our mandate for the new millennium: Evidence-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2000(54), 575–585. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.54.6.575
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, P., Hailey, D., & Jones, A. (2003). Economic evaluation for assistive technology policy decisions. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 14(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073030140021001
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R. (2020). Alternative policy evaluation frameworks and tools. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., Mazzucato, M., Ryan-Collins, J., & Sharpe, S. (2018). The economics of change: Policy appraisal for missions, market shaping and public purpose. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2018-06).
   Google Scholar
• Lansley, P., McCreadie, C., & Tinker, A. (2004). Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? Age and Ageing, 33(6), 571‐6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afh190
   Google Scholar
• Mann, W. C., Ottenbacher, K. J., Fraas, L., Tomita, M., & Granger, C. V. (1999). Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Family Medicine, 8(3), 210‐7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.8.3.210
   Google Scholar
• Manns, P. J., & Darrah, J. (2006). Linking research and clinical practice in physical therapy: Strategies for integration. Physiotherapy, 92(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasinghe, K. M., Lapitan, J. M., & Ross, A. (2015). Assistive technologies for ageing populations in six low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMJ Innovations, 1(4), 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000065
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1974). Neoclassical vs evolutionary theories of economic growth: Critique and prospectus. The Economic Journal, 84(336), 886–905. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2230572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraner, I., de Jonge, D., Layton, N., Bringolf, J., & Molenda, A. (2008). Using the ICF in economic analyses of assistive technology systems: Methodological implications of a user standpoint. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(12–13), 916–926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701800293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüler, E., Salton, B. P., Sonza, A. P., Façanha, A. R., Cainelli, R., Gatto, J., Kunzler, L., & Araújo, M. D. C. C. (2013). Production of low cost assistive technology. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, 297–301. MEDES ’13. Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Kim, Y., Nam, H., & Cho, Y. (2016). Economic evaluation of healthcare technology improving the quality of social life: The case of assistive technology for the disabled and elderly. Journal of Applied Economics, 48(15), 1361–1371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1100254
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. O. (1996). Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: Challenge and innovation. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1996.10132277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stovold, E., Beecher, D., Foxlee, R., & Noel-Storr, A. (2014). Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: An adapted PRISMA flow diagram. Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. (2019). Provision of wheelchairs in Tajikistan: Economic assessment of alternative options. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/312049/9789289054041-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&ua=1
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2014). Opening the gate for assistive health technology: Shifting the paradigm. Secondary Opening the gate for assistive health technology: Shifting the paradigm. http://www.aaate.net/sites/default/files/gate_concept_note_for_circulation.pdf
   Google Scholar