References
- Burgstahler, S. (2008). Designing software that is accessible to individuals with disabilities. Retrieved March 24, 2009, from https://www.washington.edu/doit/sites/default/files/atoms/files/Designing-Software-Accessible-Individuals-Disabilites.pdf
- David, S. (2004). Opening the sources of accountability. First Monday, 9(11), 1–27.
- Do Prado Leite, J. C., & Cappelli, C. (2010). Software transparency. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0102-z
- Eriksén, S. (2002, October). Designing for accountability. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 177–186).
- Froehlich, J. E., Saugstad, M., Martínez, E., & de Buen Kalman, R. (2020). Sidewalk accessibility in the US and Mexico: Policies, tools, and a preliminary case study. In CSCW2020 Workshop on Civic Technologies: Research, Practice, and Open Challenges.
- Hutchinson, B., Smart, A., Hanna, A. et al. (2021). Towards accountability for machine learning datasets. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445918
- Johnson, D. G. (2011). Software agents, anticipatory ethics, and accountability. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1356-7_5
- Kacianka, S., & Pretschner, A. (2021). Designing accountable systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445905
- Kroll, J. A. (2020). Accountability in computer systems. In The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI (pp. 181). Oxford University Press.
- Kulkarni, M. (2019). Digital accessibility: Challenges and opportunities. IIMB Management Review, 31(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.05.009
- Meunier, P. (2008). Software transparency and purity. Communications of the ACM, 51(2), 104-104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1314215.1314232
- Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007
- Sinagra, E., & Solutions, P. A. (2020). Development of AccessPath: A pedestrian wayfinding tool tailored towards wheelchair users and individuals with visual impairments; Phase 1 (Final Report (No. FHWA-JPO-21-846)). Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration.
- U.S. Access Board. (2021). Information and communication technology. https://www.access-board.gov/ict.html
- United States. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Office for Civil Rights. (1978). Section 504 of the rehabilitation act of 1973. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of the Secretary, Office for Civil Rights.
- W3C. (2021). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) overview. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/