Reliability and validity testing of the ASSIST functional performance index

References

• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed). The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Suppl. 2), 7412410010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
   Google Scholar
• Bujang, M. A., & Baharum, N. (2017). A simplified guide to the determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass coefficient: A review. Archives of Orofacial Sciences, 12(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock, G., & McCormack, L. (2002). Delivering an at service; a client-focused, social, and participatory service delivery model in assistive technology in Ireland. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 160–170. 10.1080/09638280110063869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers, J., Noreau, L., Robichaud, L., Fougeyrollas, P., Rochette, A., & Viscogliosi, C. (2004). Validity of the Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) in older adults. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine : Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, 36, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970410027485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, D., Morris, L., & Fairman, A. (2021, February 1-4). Development of the ASSIST checklist for smart home technology as assistive technology [Conference session]. Assistive Technology Industry Association National Conference, held Virtually. https://www.atia.org/atia-2021
   Google Scholar
• Ding, D., Morris, L., Messina, K., & Fairman, A. (2021). Providing mainstream smart home technology as assistive technology for persons with disabilities: A qualitative study with professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1998673
   Google Scholar
• Global Alliance of Assistive Technology Organizations. (2022). GAATO - AT outcome grand challenge consultation. Global Alliance of Assistive Technology. https://www.gaato.org/grand-challenges
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap®)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D. K., Hynan, L. S., Lacritz, L. H., Rossetti, H. C., Weiner, M. F., & Cullum, C. M. (2015). Short form Montreal cognitive assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/t53544-000
   Google Scholar
• Jamwal, R., Jarman, H. K., Roseingrave, E., Douglas, J., & Winkler, D. (2020). Smart home and communication technology for people with disability: A scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(6), 624–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1818138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette, A. M., Tulsky, D. S., Ni, P., Kisala, P. A., Slavin, M. D., Dijkers, M. P., Heinemann, A. W., Tate, D. G., Whiteneck, G., Charlifue, S., Houlihan, B., Williams, S., Kirshblum, S., Dyson-Hudson, T., Zanca, J., & Fyffe, D. (2012). Development and initial evaluation of the spinal cord injury-functional index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(10), 1733–1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton, N., Smith, R. O., & Smith, E. M. (2022). Global outcome of assistive technology: What we measure, we can improve. Assistive Technology, 34(6), 673–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2144690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, L. L., Steggell, C. D., Slaug, B., & Iwarsson, S. (2016). Assessment and analysis of housing accessibility: Adapting the environmental component of the housing enabler to United States applications. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(3), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9475-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson, W. B., Demers, L., Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Lenker, J., & DeRuyter, F. (2013). Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers: An exploratory randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 92(4), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31827d65bf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, I., Fisher, A. G., Hemmingsson, H., & Lilja, M. (2007). The client-clinician assessment protocol (C-CAP): Evaluation of its psychometric properties for use with people aging with disabilities in need of home modifications. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research: Occupation, Participation and Health, 27(4), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944920702700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney, L. G. (2020). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to evidence-based practice (4th ed.). F.A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin, V., & Desrosiers, J. (2009). Reliability of the LIFE-H satisfaction scale and relationship between participation and satisfaction of older adults with disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 31(16), 1311–1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280802572957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, J., Pynoos, J., Tejral, A., & Browne, A. (2009). Development of a comprehensive assessment for delivery of home modifications. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 20(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/J148v20n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. J., Craddock, G., Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L. P. (2002). Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology & Disability, 14(3), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-2002-14308
   Google Scholar
• Stark, S. L., Somerville, E. K., & Morris, J. C. (2010). In-home occupational performance evaluation (I-HOPE). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(4), 580–589. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.08065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels, R., Persson, J., Lorentsen, Ø., Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., Oortwijn, W., VanBeekum, T., Brodin, H., de Witte, L., Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L. P. (2002). IPPA: Individually prioritised problem assessment. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14310
   Google Scholar
• Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (2022). Video conferencing, cloud phone, webinars, chat, virtual events: Zoom. Zoom Video Communications. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://zoom.us/
   Google Scholar