Mastery of assistive technology: What is it? How do we measure it?

References

• Alabbas, N. A., & Miller, D. E. (2019). Challenges and assistive technology during typical routines: Perspectives of caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorders and other disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 66(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1578864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper, S., & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340602100204
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, J. S. (2013). Doceo; Competence, proficiency and beyond [On-line: UK]. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from http://www.doceo.co.uk/background/expertise.htm#DREYFUS
   Google Scholar
• Attri, R. K. (2017). 7 Models from research demystify stages in novice to expert transition [Blog post], Speed to Proficiency Research: S2PRo©. https://www.speedtoproficiency.com/blog/stages-in-novice-to-expert-transition/
   Google Scholar
• Blackhurst, A. E., Lahm, E. A., Harrison, E. M., & Chandler, W. G. (1999). A framework for aligning technology with transition competencies. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 22(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572889902200203
   Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Maeda, Y., & Flanagan, S. M. (2012). Assistive technology and students with high-incidence disabilities: Understanding the relationship through the NLTS2. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511401037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., Fleming, K., Thiemann-Bourque, K., Olswang, L., Dowden, P., Saunders, M. D., & Marquis, J. (2012). Development of the communication complexity scale. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0099)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers, S. (2022). Skill acquisition and cue-based processing [ Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University].
   Google Scholar
• Craddock, G. (2006). The at continuum in education: Novice to power user. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1(1–2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500167118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalkey, N. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study in group interaction. Rand Corporation Memorandum. Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, D., Layton, N., Bentley, J., Boot, F. H., Borg, J., Dhungana, B. M., Gallagher, P., Gitlow, L., Gowran, R. J., Groce, N., Mavrou, K., Mackeogh, T., McDonald, R., Pettersson, C., & Scherer, M. J. (2018). Assistive technology and people: A position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1471169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Why skills cannot be represented by rules. In E. Sharley (Ed.), Advances in cognitive science (pp. 315–335). Hardwood, and Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, A., & Ferri, B. A. (2012). Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01230.x
   Google Scholar
• Goegan, L. D., Le, L., Rioux, B. P., & Daniels, L. M. (2019). Examining factors that support continued use of assistive technology by postsecondary students with disabilities. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 10(1), 28–41. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/view/61661
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Rapid decision making on the fire ground. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 576–580). Human Factors Society.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (2010). Rapid decision making on the fire ground: The original study plus a postscript. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 4(3), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534310X12844000801203
   Google Scholar
• Krantz, O. (2012). Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life–a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.618212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lahm, E. A., & Nickels, B. L. (1999). What do you know? Assistive technology competencies for special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999903200108
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Ramdoss, S., Sigafoos, J., Green, V. A., van der Meer, L., Tostanoski, A., & O’Reilly, M. F. (2014). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with disabilities. In G. E. Lancioni & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities (pp. 53–76). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Langvin. (2012, January 9). The four stages of learning. Langevin Blog.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618912331275126
   Google Scholar
• Martino, J. P. (1993). Technological forecasting for decision making. McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M., & Shaver, D. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010-3008) National Center for Special Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, T. L. B., Kim, J., & Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110066235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudel, B. B. (2014). Acceptance and use of assistive technology: Perspectives of high school and college students with high-incidence disabilities. University of Delaware.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, W. E. (1983). The Delphi technique: An experimental evaluation. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 16(5), 239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Salatino, C., Pigini, L., & Andrich, R. (2018). How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person’s quality of life? In Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (pp. 238–242). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284869.3284910
   Google Scholar
• Satterfield, B. (2016). A History of AT Outcomes in Education. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, 10(1), 1–18. https://www.atia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ATOBN1V10_ART1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Satterfield, B. (2020). Mastery of assistive technology in high school and post-secondary performance. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits (ATOB), 14, 52–76. https://www.atia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ATOB-V14-A4-Satterfield.pdf%20
   Google Scholar
• Satterfield, B., Walker, B., & Milchus, K. (2021). TECH report: Continuum of Mastery of AT. Georgia Institute of Technology SMARTech Repository. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/64914
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, A. L., Parks, A., & Heyn, P. C. (2010). Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5(6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483101003746360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schieman, S., & Turner, H. A. (1998). Age, disability, and the sense of mastery. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39(3), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2020). Were we right? A re-evaluation of the perceived potential of technology to transform the educational opportunities and outcomes of learners with special educational needs. History of Education, 49(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2019.1657508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. O. (1996). Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: Challenge and innovation. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1996.10132277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiggins, M. W. (2005). The interpretation and use of weather radar displays in aviation. (Aviation Research Investigation Report). Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, M. W. (2006). Cue-based processing and human performance. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), Encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (2nd ed. pp., 641–645). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, M. W., & Bollwerk, S. (2006). Heuristic-based information acquisition and decision-making amongst pilots. Human Factors, 48(4), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872006779166325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, J., Bowser, G., & Korsten, J. (2004). SETT and ReSETT: Concepts for at implementation. Closing the Gap, 23(5), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Ajuwon, P. M., Smith, D. W., Griffin-Shirley, N., Parker, A. T., & Okungu, P. (2012). Assistive technology competencies for teachers of students with visual impairments: A national study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(10), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210601010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar