Faculty and Medical Student Attitudes About Preclinical Classroom Attendance

REFERENCES

• Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC OSR REPS’ Responses 2007 survey on using multimedia technology to record lectures. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/49144/data/multimedia.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kamin C, Souza KH, Heestand D, Moses A, O’Sullivan P. Educational technology infrastructure and services in North American medical schools. Academic Medicine 2006;81:632–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverthorn DU. Teaching and learning in the interactive classroom. Advances in Physiology Education 2006;304:135–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattick K, Crocker G, Bligh J. Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures. Advances in Health Science Education Theory and Practice 2007;12:201–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Academic Medicine 2008;83:174–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. Lifelong learning in medicine and nursing: final conference report. Available at: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/MacyReport.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fjortoft N. Students’ motivations for class attendance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2005;69:107–12.
   Google Scholar
• Westrick SC, Helms KL, McDonough SK, Breland ML. Factors influencing pharmacy students’ attendance decisions in large lectures. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2009;75:83.
   Google Scholar
• Millis RM, Dyson S, Cannon D. Association of classroom participation and examination performance in a first-year medical school course. Advances in Physiology Education 2009;33:139–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston G, Phillips R, Gosper M, McNeill M, Woo K, Green D. Web-based lecture technologies: Highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2010;26:717–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludmerer KM. Instilling professionalism in medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282:881–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baernstein A, Oelschlager AM, Chang TA, Wenrich MD. Learning professionalism: perspectives of preclinical medical students. Academic Medicine 2009;84:574–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogleman BS, Cleghorn GD. Relationship between class attendance and NBME Part I examination. Journal of Medical Education 1983;5811:904.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty JA, Hoyt A, Gruener G, Chandrasekhar A, Espiritu B, Price Jr. R., et al. An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses. BMC Medical Education 2009;9:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs JW, Blanco JD. Is there a relation between student lecture attendance and clinical science subject examination score? Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;84:311–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis J, Crabb S, Rogers E, Zamora J, Khan K. Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Teacher 2008;30:302–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, Cottrell D. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture. Medical Education 2001;35:847–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon DJ, Ferenchick GS, Laird-Fick HS, Kavanaugh K. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats. BMC Medical Education 2004;29:27.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan JC, Finn G, Macnaughton J. The conscientiousness index: A novel tool to explore students’ professionalism. Academic Medicine 2009;84:559–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon W. “Only connect …”: The goals of a liberal education. American Scholar 1998;67:73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassel H, Lourey J. The dea(r)th of student responsibility. College Teacher 2005;531:2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Academic Medicine 1994;69:861–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskowitz DT, Drucker RP, Parsonnet J, Cross PC, Gesundheit N. Engaging students in dedicated research and scholarship during medical school: The long-term experiences at Duke and Stanford. Academic Medicine 2010;85:419–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe N, Strauss W. Generations: The history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Quill, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Frand J. The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. EDUCAUSE Review 2000;35:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Young K. The X, Y, and Z of generations in schools. The International Journal of Learning 2009;16:203–15.
   Google Scholar
• Macon M, Artley JB. Can't we all just get along? A review of the challenges and opportunities in a multigenerational workforce. International Journal of Business Research 2009;9:90–4.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster P, Patel M, Johnson E, Weiss M. Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Science Education 2009;8:203–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers L, Schelew E, Wieman C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 2011;332:862–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar