REFERENCES
- Dysthe O. How a reform affects writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 2007;32:237–52.
- Fischer MR, Kopp V. Computer-based pre-clinical assessment: Does the embedding of multiple-choice questions in a clinical context change performance? GMS Z MedAusbild (Society for Medical Education) 2006;23:52–7.
- Wang S, Jiao H, Young MJ, Brooks T, Olson J. Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K12 reading assessments: a meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2008;68:5–24.
- Ford BD, Vitelli R, Stuckless N. The effects of computer versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of anger and revenge with an inmate population. Computers in Human Behavior 1996;12:159–66.
- Lee G, Weerakoon P. The role of computer-aided assessment in health professional education: A comparison of student performance in computer-based and paper-and-pen multiple-choice tests. Medical Teacher 2001;23:152–7.
- Clariana R, Wallace P. Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology 2002;33:593–602.
- Akdemir O, Oguz A. Computer-based testing: An alternative for the assessment of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers and Education 2008;51:1198–204.
- Hochlehnert A, Brass K, Moeltner A, Juenger J. Does medical students’ preference of test format (computer-based vs. paper-based) have an influence on performance? BMC Medical Education 2011;11:89–95.
- Escudier MP, Newton TJ, Cox MJ, Reynolds PA, Odell EW. University students’ attainment and perceptions of computer delivered assessment: A comparison between computer-based and traditional tests in a ‘high-stakes’ examination. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2011;27:440–7.
- Noyes J, Garland K, Robbins L. Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Is workload another test mode effect? British Journal of Educational Technology 2004;35:111–3.
- Nouns ZM, Georg W. Progress testing in German speaking countries. Medical Teacher 2010;32:467–70.
- Karay Y, Schauber SK, Stosch C, Schuettpelz-Brauns K. Can computer-based assessment enhance the acceptance of formative multiple choice exams? A utility analysis. Medical Teacher 2012;34:292–6.
- Brauns K. Identification of pattern-markers at the progress test medicine (PTM). Short Communication 4D/SC5 at AMEE Conference; August 30/September 3, 2008; Prague, Czech Republic.
- Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.
- Ogilvie RW, Trusk TC, Blue AV: Students’ attitudes towards computer testing in a basic science course. Medical Education 1999;33:828–31.
- Bereby-Meyer Y, Meyer J, Flascher OM. Prospect theory analysis of guessing in multiple-choice tests. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2002;15:313–27.