The Complexity of Patients' Health Communication Social Networks: A Broadening of Physician Communication

References

• Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality of chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Frank JR. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency Framework. Ottawa, Canada: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME common program requirements (http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf). Published July 1, 2013. Accessed February 27 2017.
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: GMC (http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors_2009.asp). Published 2009. Accessed February 26 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer JM, Mauksch L, Lang F, Marvel MK, Zoppi K, Epstein RM, Brock D, Pryzbylski M. Assessing communication competence: a review of current tools. Fam. Med 2005;37(3):184–92. PMID: 15739134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P. Shared decision making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(443):477–482. PMID: 10562751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein T, Frankel RM, Krupat E. Enhancing clinician communication skills in a large healthcare organization: a longitudinal case study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58(1):4–12. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.01.014. PMID: 15950831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calman KC. Medical education past, present and future: Handing on learning. Edinburgh, Scotland: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon P, Young B. Creativity in clinical communication: from communication skills to skilled communication. Med Educ. 2011;45(3):217–226. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03801.x. PMID: 21299597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollnick S, Kinnersley P, Butler C. Context‐bound communication skills training: development of a new method. Med Educ. 2002;36(4):377–83. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01174.x. PMID: 11940179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard DW, Heritage J. Conversation analysis, doctor–patient interaction and medical communication. Med Educ. 2005;39(4):428–35. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02111.x. PMID: 15813766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geist P, Dreyer J. The demise of dialogue: A critique of medical encounter ideology. Western J Communication. 1993;57(2):233–246. doi:10.1080/10570319309374446
   Google Scholar
• Atkins S, Roberts C, Hawthorne K, Greenhalgh T. Simulated consultations: a sociolinguistic perspective. BMC Med Ed. 2016;16(1):16. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0535-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deveugele M. Communication training: Skills and beyond. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1287–91. 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.011. PMID: 26298220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CE, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV. The construction of power in family medicine bedside teaching: A video observation study. Med Educ. 2013;47(2):154–65. doi:10.1111/medu.12055. PMID: 23323654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J. Medical education for the future: Identity, power and location. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel S. Perspective: physician leaders and their bases of power: common and disparate elements. Acad. Med. 2012;87(2):221–5. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823f3b0c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmon L, Stenfors-Hayes T. The “handling” of power in the physician-patient encounter: Perceptions from experienced physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(114):1–9. PMID: 26727954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May C. The clinical encounter and the problem of context. Sociol. 2007 Feb;41(1):29–45. doi:10.1177/0038038507072282
   Google Scholar
• University of Maryland Medical Centre. ACGME Competencies: Interpersonal Skills and Communication (http://umm.edu/professionals/gme/competencies/communication). Accessed February 1, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• AAMC News. Say that again? Teaching physicians about plain language. (https://news.aamc.org/patient-care/article/say-again-teaching-physicians-about-plain-language/). Published October 11, 2016. Accessed January 5, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday M.A.K. Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Language & symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Barton D, Hamilton M. Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. New York: Routledge; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock M (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (Vol. 3, pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates V. Ethnographic research. In Duke N, Mallette M (Eds), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 92–113). New York: Guilford Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Daly A, Ed. Social network theory and educational change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman B. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In Wellman B, Berkowitz SD (Eds). Social structures a network approach (pp. 19–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Mische A. Relational sociology: Culture and agency. In Scott J, Carrington P. (Eds.), Sage handbook for social network analysis. London: Sage; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. Nadel's paradox revisited: Relational and cultural aspects of organizational structure. In Nohria N, Eccles R (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action (pp. 118–142). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bellotti E. Qualitative networks: mixed methods in sociological research. New York: Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Isba R, Woolf K, Hanneman R. Social network analysis in medical education. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):81–8. doi:10.1111/medu.13152. PMID: 27807877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White H. Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Moody J, White D. Social cohesion and embeddeness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. Am Sociol Rev. 2003;68(1):103–127. doi:10.2307/3088904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCompte MD, Schensul JJ. Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Stewart M, McCracken E, McWhinney IR, Levenstein J. The patient-centred clinical method. 2. Definition and application. Fam Pract. 1986;3(2):75–9. 10.1093/fampra/3.2.75. PMID: 3721098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(7):1087–1110. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8. PMID: 11005395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. Chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ: Br Med J. 2009;338(7695):629–631.
   Google Scholar
• Glass TA, McAtee MJ. Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: extending horizons, envisioning the future. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1650–1671. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.044. PMID: 16198467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onnela JP, Saramäki J, Hyvönen J, Szabó G, De Menezes MA, Kaski K, Barabási AL, Kertész J. Analysis of a large-scale weighted network of one-to-one human communication. New J of Phys. 2007;9(6):179. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, CataniaJ, White M, Turner R. The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(14):1727–1734. 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727. PMID: 12885689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garden RL, Seiler WJ. Serious illness conversations with doctors: patients using information obtained from sources other than their doctors. Health Commun. 2017;32(1):22–31. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1092061. PMID: 27119417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender-deMoll S, McFarland DA. The art and science of dynamic network visualization. J Soc Struct. 2006;7(2):1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Chu KH, Wipfli H, Valente T. Using visualizations to explore network dynamics. J Soc Struct. 2013;14:4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:126–133. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032. PMID: 24507917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristancho S. Eye opener: exploring complexity using rich pictures. Perspectives on Med Educ. 2015;4(3):138–141. doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0187-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauli HG, White KL, McWhinney IR. Medical education, research, and scientific thinking in the 21st century (part one of three). Educ for Health. 2000;13(2):173–186. doi:10.1080/13576280050074435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regehr G. It's NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):31–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x. PMID: 20078754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard L, McDougall A, Levstik M, Chandok N, Spafford MM, Schryer C. Representing complexity well: a story about teamwork, with implications for how we teach collaboration. Med Educ. 2012;46(9):869–77. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04339.x. PMID: 22891907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensing J, Van Dulmen S, Tates K. Communication in context: new directions in communication research. Patient Educ and Couns. 2003;50(1):27–32. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00076-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucey CR. Medical education: part of the problem and part of the solution. JAMA Internal Med. 2013;173(17):1639–43. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach MC, Inui T. Relationship-centered care. J General Internal Med. 2006;21:S3–S8. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00302.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss T, Swede MJ. Transforming pre-professional health education through relationship-centered care and narrative medicine. Teach Learn Med. 2016;1–12. doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1159566. PMID: 27141931
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges BD, Kuper A. Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education. Acad. Med. 2012;87(1):25–33. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318238e069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prideaux D. Social network analysis in medical education: a methodology in search of a theory. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):9–10. doi:10.1111/medu.13217. PMID: 27981653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard L. Collective competence. Ted Talk. 2013 Jan. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI-hifp4u40. Accessed September 29, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer T, Gaines M. Partnering with patients, families, and communities to link interprofessional practice and education. New York, NY: Josiah Macy Jr; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. Networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor-network theorist. Int J Commun. 2011;5:796–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldrop MM. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1992.
   Google Scholar