358
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Groundwork

A Tale of Two Inquiries (or, Doing Being Competent in a Clinical Skills Exam)

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Boyd E, Heritage J. Taking the history: questioning during comprehensive history-taking. In: Heritage J, Maynard D, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. New York and Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge University Press; 2006:151–184.
  • Beckman H, Frankel R. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101(5):692–696.
  • Rao JK, Anderson LA, Inui TS, Frankel R. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: A systematic review of the evidence. Med Care. 2007;45(4):340–349.
  • Hampton JR, Harrison MJ, Mitchell JR, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. Br Med J. 1975;2(5969):486–489.
  • National Board of Medical Examiners. USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS): Content description and general information. Philadelphia, PA: Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States; 2016.
  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Common Program Requirements. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2014.
  • Barrows H, Abrahamson S. The programmed patient: a technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. Acad Med. 1964;39(8):802–805.
  • Klamen D, Williams R. Using standardized clinical encounters to assess physician communication. In: Stern DT, ed. Measuring Medical Professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:53–74.
  • Swanson DB, van der Vleuten CPM. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art revisited. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(sup1):S17–S25.
  • King AM, Hoppe RB. Best practice for patient-centered communication: a narrative review. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):385–393.
  • Roter DL, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46(4):243–251.
  • van Thiel J, Kraan HF, van der Vleuten CP. Reliability and feasibility of measuring medical interviewing skills: the revised Maastricht history-taking and advice checklist. Med Educ. 1991;25(3):224–229.
  • Frankel R, Stein TS. Getting the most of the clinical encounter: the four habits model. The Perm J. 1999;3(3):79–88.
  • Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76(4):390–393.
  • Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516–1528.
  • Vu NV, Marcy MS, Colliver J, Verhulst S, Travis TA, Barrows H. Standardized (simulated) patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance check-list items. Med Educ. 1992;26(2):99–104.
  • van Luijk SJ, van der Vleuten CP. A comparison of checklists and rating scales in performance-based testing. In: Hart IR, Harden RM, Des Marchais J, eds. Current developments in assessing clinical competence. Montreal: Can-Heal Publications; 1992:357–382.
  • Williams R, McLaughlin MA, Eulenberg B, Hurm M, Nendaz MR. The patient findings questionnaire: one solution to an important standardized patient examination problem. Acad Med. 1999;74(10):1118–1124.
  • Dillon GF, Boulet JR, Hawkins RE, Swanson DB. Simulations in the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). BMJ Qual Saf. 2004;13(suppl_1):i41–i45.
  • Boulet JR, Smee SM, Dillon GF, Gimpel JR. The use of standardized patient assessments for certification and licensure decisions. Simulation in Healthcare. 2009;4(1):35–42.
  • Hoppe RB, King AM, Mazor KM, et al. Enhancement of the assessment of physician-patient communication skills in the United States Medical Licensing Examination. Acad Med. 2013;88(11):1670–1675.
  • Bickley LS, Szilagyi PG. Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
  • Icbay MA, Koschmann T. Member accounts in the assessment of professional competence. Text & Talk 2015;35:177–206.
  • Papireddy M, Han H, Hingle S, Koschmann T, Ferguson J, Sandstrom S. The resident audio-recording project: a three-step process to improve clinical communication skills. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(2):367–369.
  • Sacks H. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1992.
  • Pomerantz A, Fehr BJ. Conversation analysis: an approach to the analysis of social interaction. In: van Dijk TA, ed. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011:165–190.
  • Schegloff E. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
  • Sacks H, Schegloff E, Jefferson G. The simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 1974;50(4):696–735.
  • Schegloff E, Sacks H. Opening up closings. Semiotica. 1973;8:289–327.
  • Schegloff E, Jefferson G, Sacks H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language. 1977;53(2):361–382.
  • Schegloff E. Confirming allusions: towards an empirical account of action. Am J Sociol. 1996;102(1):161–216.
  • Levinson S. Action formation and ascription. In: Stivers T, Sidnell J, eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2013:103–131.
  • Jefferson G. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner G, ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing; 2004:13–31.
  • Koshik I. Designedly incomplete utterances: a pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Res Lang Soc Interact. 2002;35(3):277–309.
  • Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expect. 2001;4(1):58–70.
  • Heritage J. The interaction order and clinical practice: some observations on dysfunctions and action steps. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(3):338–343.
  • Heritage J, Maynard D, eds. Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:33.
  • Nguyen HT. Developing interactional competence: A conversation-analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
  • Seale C, Butler CC, Hutchby I, Kinnersley S, Rollnick S. Negotiating frame ambiguity: a study of simulated encounters in medical education. Commun Med. 2007;4(2):177–187.
  • Heritage J, Robinson JD. ‘Some’ versus ‘Any’ medical issues: encouraging patients to reveal their unmet concerns. In: Antaki C, ed. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011:15–31.
  • Beach W. Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and ‘official’ priorities in medical interviews. In: Morris GH, Chenail RJ, eds. The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1995:259–289.
  • Frankel R. The laying on of hands: aspects of organization of gaze, touch, and talk in a medical encounter. In: Fisher S, Todd A, eds. The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC, USA: Center for Applied Linguistics; 1983:10–33.
  • Heath C. Body movement and speech in medical interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
  • Beach WA. Transitional regularities for 'casual' “Okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics. 1993;19(4):325–352.
  • Antaki C. Explanation slots as resources in interaction. Br J Social Psychol. 1996;35(3):415–432.
  • Suchman L. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human/machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
  • Swartz MH, Colliver J. Using standardized patients for assessing clinical performance: an overview. Mt Sinai J Med. 1996;63(3/4):241–249.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.