Attending Emergency Physicians’ Perceptions of a Programmatic Workplace-Based Assessment System: The McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP)

References

• Hodges BD. A tea-steeping or i-Doc model for medical education? Acad Med. 2010;85(9 Suppl):S34–S44. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f12f32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Understanding workplace-based assessment and CBD. n.d.; http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/assessment/cbd-work-based-assessment-wbas-e. Accessed 2018-06-14.
   Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478–485. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence by Design: Reshaping Canadian Medical Education. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chan TM, Sherbino J, eds. McMaster Modular Assessment Program: Intermediate Edition. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Academic Life in Emergency Medicine; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chan TM, Sherbino J, eds. McMaster Modular Assessment Program: Junior Edition. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Academic Life in Emergency Medicine; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chan TM, Sherbino J, eds. McMaster Modular Assessment Program: Senior Edition. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Academic Life in Emergency Medicine; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell M, Sherbino J, Chan TM. Mind the gap: the prospects of missing data. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(5):708–712. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-16-00142.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan TM, Sherbino J, Mercuri M. Nuance and noise: lessons learned from longitudinal aggregated assessment data. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(6):724–729. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-17-00086.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sebok-Syer SS, Klinger DA, Sherbino J, Chan TM. Mixed messages or miscommunication? Investigating the relationship between assessors’ workplace-based assessment scores and written comments. Acad Med. 2017;92(12):1774–1779. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S-A, Sherbino J, Chan TM. McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP) through the years: residents’ experience with an evolving feedback culture over a 3-year period. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(1):5–14. doi:10.1002/aet2.10009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massie J, Ali JM. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016;21(2):455–473. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive Description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Kirkham SR, O'Flynn-Magee K. The analytic challenge in interpretive description. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(1):1–11. doi:10.1177/160940690400300101.
   Google Scholar
• Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25(10):1229–1245. doi:10.1080/08870440903194015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TM, Sherbino J, McMAP C. The McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP): a theoretically grounded work-based assessment system for an emergency medicine residency program. Acad Med. 2015;90(7):900–905. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S84–S87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yepes-Rios M, Dudek N, Duboyce R, Curtis J, Allard RJ, Varpio L. The failure to fail underperforming trainees in health professions education: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 42. Med Teach. 2016;38(11):1092–1099. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen SA, Petrisor B, Bhandari M, Fahim C, McKinnon V, Sonnadara RR. Examining the barriers to meaningful assessment and feedback in medical training. Am J Surg. 2016;211(2):464–475. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutky M, Goldszmidt M, Chahine S. Development of a personalized competence based assessment tool (PCAT) in internal medicine. Oral abstract presented at: The 12^th Annual Canadian Conference on Medical Education. 2018; Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer KE, Chesluk B, Iobst W, et al. Reviewing residents’ competence: a qualitative study of the role of clinical competency committees in performance assessment. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1084–1092. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahim C, Bhandari M, Yang I, Sonnadara RR. Development and early piloting of a CanMEDS competency-based feedback tool for surgical grand rounds. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(3):409–415. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CPM, Eva KW. The hidden value of narrative comments for assessment: a quantitative reliability analysis of qualitative data. Acad Med. 2017;92(11):1617–1621. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekpenyong A, Baker E, Harris I, et al. How do clinical competency committees use different sources of data to assess residents’ performance on the internal medicine milestones? A mixed methods pilot study. Med Teach. 2017;39(10):1074–1083. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1353070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schut S, Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Heeneman S. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners’ perceptions within programmatic assessment. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):654–663. doi:10.1111/medu.13532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar