Assessing Preceptor Use of Cognitive Apprenticeship: Is the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) a Useful Approach?

References

• Steinert Y, Basi M, Nugus P. How physicians teach in the clinical setting: the embedded roles of teaching and clinical care. Med Teach. 2017;39(12):1238–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie DA, Forest CP, Kysh L, Sinclair L. Interprofessional education and practice guide No. 5: Interprofessional teaching for prequalification students in clinical settings. J Interprof Care. 2016;30(3):324–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos SS, Trewet CB. A comprehensive approach to preceptor development. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(3):47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatem CJ, Lown BA, Newman LR. The academic health center coming of age: Helping faculty become better teachers and agents of educational change. Acad Med. 2006;81(11):941–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28(6):497–526. doi:10.1080/01421590600902976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer J. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment: ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. BMJ. 2003;326(7389):591–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell D, Kilminster S, Jolly B, Grant J. What is effective supervision and how does it happen? A critical incident study. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1042–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari AA, Arekat MR, Salem AH. Validating the modified System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities: A teaching quality assessment instrument. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:881–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluit C, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(12):1337–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombarts MJ, Heineman MN, Arah OA. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26(1):14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(9):971–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins A, Brown JS, Holum A. Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. American Educator 1991;15(3):6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Collins A, Brown JS, Newman SE. Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In: Resnick LB, ed. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1989:453–494.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons K, McLaughlin JE, Khanova J, Roth MT. Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(3):723–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen I, Scherpbier AJ. Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students? Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(4):535–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans D, Wolfhagen I, Muijtjens A, Scherpbier A. The Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliably instrument for the evaluation of preceptors. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1732–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans D, Snellen-Balendong HA, Santen-Hoeufft M, Wolfhagen I, Scherpbier A. Clinical teaching based on principles of cognitive apprenticeship: views of experienced preceptors. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):861–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerboom TB, Mainhard T, Dolmans D, Scherpbier A, van Beukelen P, Jaarsma A. Evaluating preceptors with the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire: how much ‘teacher’ is in student ratings? Med Teach. 2012;34(4):320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan TA, Lau C, Patel M, et al. Student-valued measurable teaching behaviors of award-winning pharmacy preceptors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(10):151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonthisombat P. Pharmacy student and preceptor perceptions of preceptor teaching behaviors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(5):110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinelli NR, McLaughlin JE, Khanova J, et al. Identifying the presence of cognitive apprenticeship in the layered learning practice model. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(1):6155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick S. Validity. In: Linn RL, ed. Educational Measurement. 3rd ed. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan; 1989:13–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006;19:166.e7–116.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cizek GJ. Validity test score meaning and defending test score use: Different aims, different methods. Assess Educ. 2016;23(2):212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Standards 2016. http://www.acpe-accredit.org/standards/default.asp. Accessed August 5, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Guidance for the accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy degree. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/GuidanceforStandards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• ASHP. ASHP required competency areas, goals, and objectives for postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy residencies. https://www.ashp.org/Professional-Development/Residency-Information/Residency-Program-Directors/Residency-Accreditation/Accreditation-Standards-for-PGY1-Pharmacy-Residencies. Accessed May 12, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Hu IT, Bentler PM. Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long LS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:136–162.
   Google Scholar
• West SG, Taylor AB, Wu W. Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In: Hoyle RH, ed. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 2012:209–231.
   Google Scholar
• Boerboom TB, Dolmans D, Jaarsma A, Muijtjens A, van Beukelen P, Scherpbier A. Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers’ supervisory skills during clinical rotations. Med Teach. 2011;33(2):e84–e91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AACP. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Preceptor Survey: 2015 National Survey Report. https://www.aacp.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/Preceptor%20Survey_National%20Summary%20Report%20for%20web_20150916.pdf. Accessed August 5, 2017.
   Google Scholar