A review of U.S. Medical schools’ promotion standards for educational excellence

References

• Simpson D, Fincher RME, Hafler JP, et al. Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Med Educ. 2007;41(10):1002–1009. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02844.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Chandran L, Gusic M. Guidelines for evaluating the educational performance of medical school faculty: priming a national conversation. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(3):285–297. doi:10.1080/10401334.2011.586936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusic ME, Baldwin CD, Chandran L, et al. Evaluating educators using a novel toolbox: applying rigorous criteria flexibly across institutions. Acad Med. 2014;89(7):1006–1011. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson RT. Rediscovering the medical school. Acad Med. 2003;78(7):659–665. doi:10.1097/00001888-200307000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nora LM. The 21st century faculty member in the educational process-what should be on the horizon? Acad Med. 2010;85(9 Suppl):S45–S55. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f13618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickinson BL, Deming N, Coplit L, et al. IAMSE member perspectives on the recognition, reward, and promotion of medical science educators: an IAMSE sponsored survey. Med Sci Educ. 2018;28(2):335–343. doi:10.1007/s40670-018-0548-z.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Whitcomb ME. The medical school's faculty is its most important asset. Acad Med. 2003;78(2):117–118. doi:10.1097/00001888-200302000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassick CE. Boyer's expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 2000;75(9):877–880. doi:10.1097/00001888-200009000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D, Hafler J, Brown D, et al. Documentation systems for educators seeking academic promotion in US medical schools. Acad Med. 2004;79(8):783–790. doi:10.1097/00001888-200408000-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Chandran L, Gusic M. Educator evaluation guidelines. MedEdPORTAL. 2012;8(9072).
   Google Scholar
• Gusic M, Amiel J, Baldwin C, et al. Using the AAMC toolbox for evaluating educators: you be the judge! MedEdPORTAL. 2013;9(9313).
   Google Scholar
• Fincher RE, Simpson DE, Mennin SP, et al. Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21st century. Acad Med. 2000;75(9):887–894. doi:10.1097/00001888-200009000-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan MS, Tucker C, DiazGranados D, et al. How are clinician-educators evaluated for educational excellence? A survey of promotion and tenure committee members in the United States. Med Teach. 2019;41(8):927–933. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1596237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JA. Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkimer JC, Brown JH. Back to basics: percentage agreement measures are adequate, but there are easier ways. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979;12(4):535–543. doi:10.1901/jaba.1979.12-535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman MM, Richard GV. Faculty career tracks at US medical schools. Acad Med. 2011;86(8):932–937. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182222699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Contingency and the Profession. Tenure and Teaching-Intensive Appointments. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• American Council on Education, American Association of University Professors, United Educators Insurance Risk Retention Group. Good Practice in Tenure Evaluation: Advice for Tenured Faculty, Department Chairs, and Academic Administrators. Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Shinkai K, Chen CA, Schwartz BS, et al. Rethinking the educator portfolio: an innovative criteria-based model. Acad Med. 2018;93(7):1024–1028. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irby DM, O'Sullivan PS. Developing and rewarding teachers as educators and scholars: remarkable progress and daunting challenges. Med Educ. 2018;52(1):58–67. doi:10.1111/medu.13379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar