Hierarchy, “Kreng Jai” and Feedback: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring Perspectives of Clinical Faculty and Medical Students in Thailand

References

• Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesketh EA, Laidlaw JM. Developing the teaching instinct, 1: feedback. Med Teach. 2002;24(3):245–248. doi:10.1080/014215902201409911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77(12):1185–1188. doi:10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Bok HG. Believing is seeing: how people's beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour. Med Teach. 2013;47(11):1064–1072. doi:10.1111/medu.12228.
   Google Scholar
• Watling C. Cognition, culture, and credibility: deconstructing feedback in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(2):124–128. doi:10.1007/s40037-014-0115-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, et al. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1698–1706. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337(a1961):1292–1294. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1961.
   Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1330–1331. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, McNaughton E, Mercer S, Murphy D, Sullivan P, Bruce DA. Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Med Teach. 2011;33(9):744–749. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.577287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):787–791. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.684916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. Guidelines: the do's, don'ts and don't knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(6):284–299. doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The "educational alliance" as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–614. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CE, Keating JL, Boud DJ, et al. Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:1–11. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0613-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• van der Zwet J, Zwietering PJ, Teunissen PJ, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJ. Workplace learning from a socio-cultural perspective: creating developmental space during the general practice clerkship. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011;16(3):359–373. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9268-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):76–85. doi:10.1111/medu.13645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther F, Kaagan SS, Ferguson M, Hann L. Developing Teacher Leaders: How Teacher Leadership Enhances School Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Kirwan; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47(6):585–594. doi:10.1111/medu.12150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Med Educ. 2014;48(7):713–723. doi:10.1111/medu.12407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Post SE, Könings K, Mann K, Katz JT, van der Vleuten C. “It’s just not the culture”: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(2):153–161. doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Könings KD, Mann KV, Pisarski EE, van der Vleuten CPM. About politeness, face, and feedback: exploring resident and faculty perceptions of how institutional feedback culture influences feedback practices. Acad Med. 2018;93(9):1348–1358. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. National cultures in four dimensions: a research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. Int Stud Man Org. 1983;13(1):46–74. doi:10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358.
   Google Scholar
• Petison P. Cross cultural relationship marketing in the Thai context: the Japanese buyer’s perspective. Int J Trade Econ Finance. 2010;1(1):17–23. doi:10.7763/IJTEF.2010.V1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard P. Some attitudes towards teaching and learning in Thai nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;26(3):253–257. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainzbauer A, Hunt B. Meeting the challenges of teaching in a different cultural environment evidence from graduate management schools in Thailand. Asia Pac J Educ. 2016;36(sup1):56–68. doi:10.1080/02188791.2014.934779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komin S. Culture and work-related values in Thai organizations. Int J Psychol. 1990;25(3):681–704. doi:10.1080/00207599008247921.
   Google Scholar
• Yukongdi V. A study of Thai employees' preferred leadership style. Asia Pac Bus Rev. 2010;16(1-2):161–181. doi:10.1080/13602380903168962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews TG, Chompusri N. Understanding organizational practice adoption at the Thai subsidiary corporation: antecedents and consequences of kreng jai. Manage Int Rev. 2013;53(1):61–82. doi:10.1007/s11575-012-0163-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong AK. Culture in medical education: comparing a Thai and a Canadian residency programme. Med Educ. 2011;45(12):1209–1219. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04059.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):101–108. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02378.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Lingard L. Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE guide no. 70. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):850–861. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.704439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. London, UK: Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Britten N. Qualitative interviews. In: Pope C, Mays N, eds. Qualitative Research in Health Care. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2006:12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Grounded theory and realism. In: Patton MQ, ed. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2014:109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Könings K, Mann K, van der Vleuten C. AM last page: a guide to reflexivity for qualitative researchers in education. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tavakol M, Sandars J. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE guide no 90: part II. Med Teach. 2014;36(10):838–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Mcnaughton N, Van Mook WN. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE guide no. 91. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):923–939. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Focus groups. In: Pope C, Mays N, eds. Qualitative Research in Health Care. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2006:21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. "Data were saturated … ". Qual Health Res. 2015;25(5): 587–588. doi:10.1177/1049732315576699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C. When I say … learning culture. Med Educ. 2015;49(6):556–557. doi:10.1111/medu.12657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield KE, Spencer JA. A survey of medical students' views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Med Educ. 2002;36(9):879–886. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01291.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sender Liberman A, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach. 2005;27(5):470–472. doi:10.1080/0142590500129183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut A, Yarris LM, Sargeant J. Feedback: cultivating a positive culture. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(2):262–264. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-15-00103.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kikukawa M, Nabeta H, Ono M, Emura S, Oda Y, Koizumi S, Sakemi T. The characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians in Japan: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:100. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker WA. Critical examination of ELT in Thailand: the role of cultural awareness. RELC J. 2008;39(1):131–146. doi:10.1177/0033688208091144.
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ. 2007;41(6):583–591. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02769.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2008;13(3):275–288. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ridder JMM, Berk FCJ, Stokking KM, ten Cate OTJ. Feedback providers' credibility impacts students' satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance. Med Teach. 2015;37(8):767–774. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.970617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ridder JM, Peters CM, Stokking KM, de Ru JA, ten Cate OT. Framing of feedback impacts student's satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20(3):803–816. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9567-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ. 2005;39(5):497–504. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02124.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Diessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Understanding responses to feedback: the potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Med Educ. 2012;46(6):593–603. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04209.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Unfulfilled promise, untapped potential: feedback at the crossroads. Med Teach. 2014;36(8):692–697. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.889812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Kenyon CF, Schulz V, Goldszmidt MA, Zibrowski E, Lingard L. An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Acad Med. 2010;85(7):1157–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar