Assessment to Optimize Learning Strategies: A Qualitative Study of Student and Faculty Perceptions

References

• Fosnot, CT. Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie JAC, Donoghue GM. Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Sci Learn. 2016;1:16013. doi:10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cutting MF, Saks NS. Twelve tips for utilizing principles of learning to support medical education. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):20–24. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.558143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013;14(1):4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin JR. Elaboration-based learning strategies: Powerful theory = powerful application. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1988;13(3):191–205. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(88)90020-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(10):959–966. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger HL, Butler AC. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(1):20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby T, Wood E. Elaborative interrogation examined at encoding and retrieval. Learning and Instruction. 1994;4(2):139–149. Learn Instr. 1994;4(2)139:–149. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90008-6.
   Google Scholar
• Desy J, Busche K, Cusano R, Veale P, Coderre S, McLaughlin K. How teachers can help learners build storage and retrieval strength. Med Teach. 2018;40(4):407–413. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormald BW, Schoeman S, Somasunderam A, Penn M. Assessment drives learning: an unavoidable truth? Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(5):199–204. doi:10.1002/ase.102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott IM. Beyond “driving”: The relationship between assessment, performance and learning. Med Educ. 2020;54(1):54–59. doi:10.1111/medu.13935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DCM, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):e1561–e1572. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie VIV, Collins B, McInnes B. Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? Account Educ. 1997;6(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/096392897331587.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott KB, Agarwal PK, D'Antonio L, Roediger HL, McDaniel MA. Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014;20(1):3–21. doi:10.1037/xap0000004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York, NY: David McKay Company; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock GR. Cognitive complexity and the comparability of multiple-choice and constructed-response test formats. J Exp Educ. 1994;62(2):143–157. doi:10.1080/00220973.1994.9943836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez ME. Cognition and the question of test item format. Educ Psychol. 1999;34(4):207–218. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3404_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Modelling the pre-assessment learning effects of assessment: evidence in the validity chain. Med Educ. 2012;46(11):1087–1098. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04334.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam D. What is assessment for learning? Stud Educ Eval. 2011;37(1):3–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer KE, Boscardin C, Brenner JM, van Schaik SM, Papp KK. Twelve tips for assessing medical knowledge with open-ended questions: Designing constructed response examinations in medical education. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):880–885. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1629404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke JD, Roediger HL. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science. 2008;319(5865):966–968. doi:10.1126/science.1152408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer KE, O'Sullivan PS, Fitzhenry K, Boscardin C. Translating theory into practice: implementing a program of assessment. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):444–450. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Written assessment. BMJ. 2003;326(7390):643–645. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7390.643.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livingston SA. Constructed-response test questions: Why we use them; how we score them. RD Connect. 2011;11:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen N. The real test bias. influences of testing on teaching and learning. Am Psychol. 1984;39(3):193–202. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.3.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen GA. Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(3):12–23. doi:10.1177/160940690600500304.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res. 1995;5(2):147–149. doi:10.1177/104973239500500201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Mcnaughton N, Van Mook WNKA. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):923–939. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortlipp M. Keepingand using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. Qual Rep. 2008;13(4):695–705.
   Google Scholar
• Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C. Merging views on assessment. Med Educ. 2004;38(12):1208–1210. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02055.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(4):159–167. doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzahrani SS, Soo Park Y, Tekian A. Study habits and academic achievement among medical students: a comparison between male and female subjects. Med Teach. 2018;40(sup1):S1–S9. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1464650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liles J, Vuk J, Tariq S. Study habits of medical students: an analysis of which study habits most contribute to success in the preclinical years. MedEdPublish. 2018;7(1). doi:10.15694/mep.2018.0000061.1.
   Google Scholar
• Piza F, Kesselheim JC, Perzhinsky J, et al. Awareness and usage of evidence-based learning strategies among health professions students and faculty. Med Teach. 2019;41(12):1411–1418. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1645950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM. Ten key features of the future medical school-not an impossible dream. Med Teach. 2018;40(10):1010–1015. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1498613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooding HC, Mann K, Armstrong E. Twelve tips for applying the science of learning to health professions education. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):26–31. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1231913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Brydges R, Woods NN, Manzone J, Schwartz DL. Preparation for future learning: a missing competency in health professions education? Med Educ. 2016;50(1):115–123. doi:10.1111/medu.12893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh D, De Champlain A, Touchie C. Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil: Making a continued case for the use of MCQs in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(5):569–577. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1505035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer EJ, Devitt PG. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:49 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-7-49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kost A, Chen FM. Socrates was not a pimp: changing the paradigm of questioning in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(1):20–24. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen DR, Priest KC, Batten JN, Fragoso LE, Reinfeld BI, Laitman BM. Student perspectives on the “step 1 climate” in preclinical medical education. Acad Med. 2019;94(3):302–304. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USMLE Unites States Medical Licensing Examination. Retrieved Accessed April 21, 2020, from https://www.usmle.org/announcements/?ContentId=264.
   Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(3):222–232. doi:10.1007/s40037-014-0129-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar