The Advice Given During Near-Peer Interactions Before and After Curriculum Change

References

• Dubosh NM, Hall MM, Novack V, Shafat T, Shapiro NI, Ullman E. A multimodal curriculum with patient feedback to improve medical student communication: pilot study. West J Emerg Med. 2019;21(1):115–121. doi:10.5811/westjem.2018.11.44318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibli-Rahhal A, Brenneman A, McVancel M, Rosenbaum M. A practical approach to integrating communication skills and early clinical experience into the preclinical medical school curriculum. MedSciEduc. 2019;29(4):947–957. doi:10.1007/s40670-019-00779-1.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Acad Med. 2007;82(1):74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook KM, Pfeiffer CA. Impact of a new curriculum on medical students’ interpersonal and interviewing skills. Med Educ. 2007;41(2):154–159. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.​2006.02680.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):207–212. doi:10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid H, Lebeau R, Saks N, et al. Exploring the role of peer advice in self-regulated learning: metacognitive, social, and environmental factors. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(4):353–357. doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1217225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou CL, Teherani A. A foundation for vital academic and social support in clerkships: learning through peer continuity. Acad Med. 2017;92(7):951–955. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilminster S, Zukas M, Quinton N, Roberts T. Preparedness is not enough: understanding transitions as critically intensive learning periods. Med Educ. 2011;45(10):1006–1015. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04048.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona CE, Russell DW. The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. In: Jones WH, Perlman D, eds. Advances in Personal Relationships. Vol. 1. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press; 1987:37–67.
   Google Scholar
• Plyley TJ, Cory JM, Flexman AM. Near-peer mentorship compared with traditional mentorship in the University of British Columbia anesthesia residency program. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67(11):1655–1657. doi:10.1007/s12630-020-01739-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggins A, Sandhu G, Ross PT. Value of near-peer mentorship from protégé and mentor perspectives: a strategy to increase physician workforce diversity. J Natl Med Assoc. 2018;110(4):399–406. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2017.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):591–599. doi:10.1080/014215​90701606799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olvet DM, Wackett A, Crichlow S, Baldelli P. Analysis of a near peer tutoring program to improve medical students’ note writing skills. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2020. 24 February Online ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg CJ, Nanos KN, Newcomer KL. The "near-peer" approach to teaching musculoskeletal physical examination skills benefits residents and medical students. Pm R. 2017;9(3):251–257. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.06.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caretta-Weyer H, Masters M, Tillman D, Hess J. Bridging the gap: implementation of a near-peer resident-medical student mentoring program within an academic emergency medicine residency program. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(4.1):S7.
   Google Scholar
• Blank WA, Blankenfeld H, Vogelmann R, Linde K, Schneider A. Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination?BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(1):165. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(S1):S16–S20. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.​2006.00304.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blouin D. Impact of interpersonal relations on learning and development of professional identity: a study of residents’ perceptions. Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30(3):398–405. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adema M, Dolmans DHJM, Raat J, Scheele F, Jaarsma ADC, Helmich E. Social interactions of clerks: the role of engagement, imagination, and alignment as sources for professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2019;94(10):1567–1573. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callese T, Strowd R, Navarro B, et al. Conversation starter: advancing the theory of peer-assisted learning. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(1):7–16. doi:10.1080/10401334.2018.1550855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai JH, Canny BJ, Haines TP, Molloy EK. Identifying opportunities for peer learning: an observational study of medical students on clinical placements. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(1):13–24. doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1165101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):546–552. doi:10.1080/01421590701583816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Westerman M. Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):51–59. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03755.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindler PM, Bates J, Hui E, Eva KW. How and why Preclerkship students set learning goals and assess their achievement: a qualitative exploration. Acad Med. 2017;92(11S):S61–S66. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001913.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahlke RM. Generic qualitative approaches: pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13(1):37–52. doi:10.1177/160940691401300119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):101–108. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02378.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton RK, Reeder GG, Kendall PL. The Student-Physician: Introductory Studies in the Sociology of Medical Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Becker H, Geer B, Hughes EC, Strauss AL. Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Lam JTH, Hanson MD, Martimianakis MAT. Exploring the socialization experiences of medical students from social science and humanities backgrounds. Acad Med. 2020;95(3):401–410. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamaroudis S, Poulogiannopoulou E, Sotiropoulos MG, Kalantzis T, Johnson EO. Implementing change in neuroanatomy education: organization, evolution, and assessment of a near-peer teaching program in an undergraduate medical school in Greece. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(6):694–706. doi:10.1002/ase.1944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison CH, Elmansouri A, Parton W, et al. The efficacy of frontline near-peer teaching in a modern medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(3):236–244. doi:10.1002/ase.1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsi IA. The value of near-peer teaching in the medical curriculum: a medical student’s perspective. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:247–248. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S163977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren D, Lockyer J, Kelly M, Chick N, Ellaway RH. In our own time: medical students’ informal social studying and learning. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(4):353–361. doi:10.1080/10401334.2020.1733579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atherley AEN, Nimmon L, Teunissen PW, Dolmans D, Hegazi I, Hu W. Students’ social networks are diverse, dynamic and deliberate when transitioning to clinical training. Med Educ. 2021;55(3):376–386. doi:10.1111/medu.14382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautz WE, Schubert S, Schauber SK, et al. Accuracy of self-monitoring: does experience, ability or case difficulty matter?Med Educ. 2019;53(7):735–744. doi:10.1111/medu.13801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin ABH, Dunlosky J, Calvalcanti RB. Monitoring and regulation of learning in medical education: the need for predictive cues. Med Educ. 2017;51(6):575–584. doi:10.1111/medu.13267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73(4):403–407. doi:10.1097/00001888-199804000-00013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafferty FW, Watson KV. The rise of learning communities in medical education: a socio-structural analysis. J Cancer Educ. 2007;22(1):6–9. doi:10.1007/BF03174367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson N. Landscapes of practice in medical education. Med Educ. 2020;54(6):504–509. doi:10.1111/medu.14061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley H, Steinert Y, Regehr G, Nimmon L. When I say … community of practice. Med Educ. 2019;53(8):763–765. doi:10.1111/medu.13823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):76–85. doi:10.1111/medu.13645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar