464
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Groundwork

Connecting Biochemistry Knowledge to Patient Care in the Clinical Workplace: Senior Medical Students’ Perceptions about Facilitators and Barriers

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 398-410 | Received 16 Jul 2021, Accepted 18 May 2022, Published online: 07 Jul 2022

References

  • Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN. Flexner revisited: The role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):349–355. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88b09.
  • Irby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):220–227. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449.
  • Pock AR, Durning SJ, Gilliland WR, Pangaro LN. Post-Carnegie II curricular reform: A north American survey of emerging trends & challenges. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):260. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1680-1.
  • de Bruin ABH, Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. The role of basic science knowledge and clinical knowledge in diagnostic reasoning: A structural equation modeling approach. Acad Med. 2005;80(8):765–773. doi:10.1097/00001888-200508000-00014.
  • Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):107–112. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02036.x.
  • Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. It all make sense: biomedical knowledge, causal connections and memory in the novice diagnostician. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(4):405–415. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9055-x.
  • Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(4):417–426. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9054-y.
  • Mylopoulos M, Woods N. Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction. Med Educ. 2014;48(7):667–673. doi:10.1111/medu.12426.
  • Dickinson BL, Gibson K, VanDerKolk K, et al. "It is this very knowledge that makes us doctors": an applied thematic analysis of how medical students perceive the relevance of biomedical science knowledge to clinical medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):356. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02251-w.
  • O’Brien B, Cooke M, Irby DM. Perceptions and attributions of third-year student struggles in clerkships: Do students and clerkship directors agree? Acad Med. 2007;82(10):970–978. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814a4fd5.
  • Surmon L, Bialocerkowski A, Hu W. Perceptions of preparedness for the first medical clerkship: a systematic review and synthesis. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):89. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0615-3.
  • Prince KJAH, Van De Wiel M, Scherpbier AJJA, van Der Vleuten CPM, Boshuizen HPA. A qualitative analysis of the transition from theory to practice in undergraduate training in a PBL-medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2000;5(2):105–116. doi:10.1023/A:1009873003677.
  • Bolander Laksov K, Lonka K, Josephson A. How do medical teachers address the problem of transfer? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13(3):345–360. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9048-9.
  • Bergman EM, de Bruin ABH, Herrler A, Verheijen IWH, Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CP. Students’ perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:152. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-152.
  • AAMC-HHMI Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians. https://www.hhmi.org/news/aamc-hhmi-committee-defines-scientific-competencies-future-physicians. Accessed December 3, 2021.
  • Afshar M, Han Z. Teaching and learning medical biochemistry: Perspectives from a student and an educator. Med Sci Educ. 2014;24(3):339–341. doi:10.1007/s40670-014-0004-7.
  • Spicer DB, Thompson KH, Tong MS, Cowan TM, Fulton TB, Lindsley JE. Medical biochemistry without rote memorization: multi-institution implementation and student perceptions of a nationally standardized metabolic map for learning and assessment. Med Sci Educ. 2019;29(1):87–92. doi:10.1007/s40670-018-00631-y.
  • Graduation Questionnaire (GQ). AAMC. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/graduation-questionnaire-gq. Accessed June 21, 2021.
  • Norman G, Dore K, Krebs J, Neville AJ. The power of the plural: Effect of conceptual analogies on successful transfer. Acad Med. 2007;82(10 Suppl):S16–S18. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181405ad7.
  • Norman G. Teaching basic science to optimize transfer. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):807–811. doi:10.1080/01421590903049814.
  • Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead CR, Woods NN. Cognition before curriculum: Rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1578–1585. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a45def.
  • Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1133–1139. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02915.x.
  • Rikers RMJP, Loyens SMM, Schmidt HG. The role of encapsulated knowledge in clinical case representations of medical students and family doctors. Med Educ. 2004;38(10):1035–1043. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01955.x.
  • Kulasegaram KM, Chaudhary Z, Woods N, Dore K, Neville A, Norman G. Contexts, concepts and cognition: principles for the transfer of basic science knowledge. Med Educ. 2017;51(2):184–195. doi:10.1111/medu.13145.
  • Fulton TB, Ronner P, Lindsley JE. Medical biochemistry in the era of competencies: Is it time for the krebs cycle to go? Med Sci Educ. 2012;22(1):29–32. doi:10.1007/BF03341749.
  • Aquifer Sciences Curriculum. https://www.aquifersciences.org/. Accessed June 21, 2021.
  • Castillo J-M, Park YS, Harris I, et al. A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):592–604. doi:10.1111/medu.13519.
  • Dyre L, Tolsgaard MG. The gap in transfer research. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):580–582. doi:10.1111/medu.13591.
  • Norris ME, Cachia MA, Johnson MI, Rogers KA, Martin CM. Expectations and perceptions of students’ basic science knowledge: Through the lens of clerkship directors. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(1):355–365. doi:10.1007/s40670-019-00913-z.
  • Quesnelle KM, Zaveri NT, Schneid SD, et al. Design of a foundational sciences curriculum: Applying the ICAP framework to pharmacology education in integrated medical curricula. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9(3):e00762. doi:10.1002/prp2.762.
  • Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive View. Hoboken NJ: PrenticeHall; 1986.
  • Schunk DH, ed. Social cognitive theory. In Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. 8th ed. New York, NY: Pearson; 2020. p. 124–167.
  • Kercheval JB, Mott NM, Kim EK, et al. Students’ perspectives on basic and clinical science integration when step 1 is administered after the core clerkships. Teach Learn Med. 2022:1–11.: doi:10.1080/10401334.2022.2030235.
  • Burke LA, Hutchins HM. Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2007;6(3):263–296. doi:10.1177/1534484307303035.
  • Peters S, Clarebout G, van Nuland M, Aertgeerts B, Roex A. A qualitative exploration of multiple perspectives on transfer of learning between classroom and clinical workplace. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(1):22–32. doi:10.1080/10401334.2017.1339605.
  • Bradbury-Jones C, Breckenridge J, Clark MT, Herber OR, Wagstaff C, Taylor J. The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: A focused mapping review and synthesis. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(6):627–645. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1270583.
  • Blume B, Ford J, Baldwin T, Huang J. Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. J Manage. 2010;36(4):1065–1105. doi:10.1177/0149206309352880.
  • Fulton TB, Collins S. Connecting biochemistry knowledge to patient care - a qualitative study of senior medical students’ perceptions. Paper presented at: 2021 American Education Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting; April 8–12, 2021; Virtual.
  • Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:160940691987459. doi:10.1177/1609406919874596.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
  • Elfanagely Y, Tanzer JR, Pulido R, Rashid H, Copeland L. How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236365. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236365.
  • Daniel M, Morrison G, Hauer KE, et al. Strategies from 11 U.S. medical schools for integrating basic science into core clerkships. Acad Med. 2021;96(8):1125–1130. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003908.
  • Stevens CD. Repeal and replace? A note of caution for medical school curriculum reformers. Acad Med. 2018;93(10):1425–1427. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002219.
  • Baghdady MT, Carnahan H, Lam EWN, Woods NN. Integration of basic sciences and clinical sciences in oral radiology education for dental students. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(6):757–763. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.6.tb05527.x.
  • Kulasegaram K, Manzone JC, Ku C, Skye A, Wadey V, Woods NN. Cause and effect: Testing a mechanism and method for the cognitive integration of basic science. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):S63–S69. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000896.
  • Pai JS, Kirsch HE, O’Sullivan PS, Cornett PA. “What is the mechanism?”: Cues, barriers, and opportunities to discuss foundational science during internal medicine rounds. Med Teach. 2022;1–7. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2033189.
  • Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347–364. doi:10.1080/01421590802061613.
  • Mann K, MacLeod A. Constructivism: Learning theories and approaches to research. In: Cleland J, Durning S, eds. Researching Medical Education. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell; 2015:51–65.
  • Wong BM, Goldman J, Goguen JM, et al. Faculty–resident “co-learning”: A longitudinal exploration of an innovative model for faculty development in quality improvement. Acad Med. 2017;92(8):1151–1159. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001505
  • Haddock L, Rivera J, O’Brien B. Let’s learn together: How faculty and trainees co-learn in the workplace. Acad Med. Accepted for publication.
  • Gruppen LD, Irby DM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Conceptualizing Learning Environments in the Health Professions. Acad Med. 2019;94(7):969–974. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002702.
  • Olson AL, Woodhead J, Berkow R, Kaufman NM, Marshall SG. A national general pediatric clerkship curriculum: the process of development and implementation. Pediatrics. 2000;106(1 Pt 2):216–222.
  • Society of Teachers of Family Medicine National Clerkship Curriculum. https://www.stfm.org/teachingresources/curriculum/nationalclerkshipcurriculum/overview/. Accessed December 11, 2021.
  • Gray B, Vandergrift J, Lipner RS, Green MM. Comparison of content on the American board of internal medicine maintenance of certification examination with conditions seen in practice by general internists. JAMA. 2017;317(22):2317–2324. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.6853.
  • Peters S, Clarebout G, Diemers A, et al. Enhancing the connection between the classroom and the clinical workplace: A systematic review. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(3):148–157. doi:10.1007/s40037-017-0338-0.
  • Fall LH, English R, Fulton TB, et al. Thinking slow more quickly: Development of integrated illness scripts to support cognitively integrated learning and improve clinical decision-making. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(3):1005–1007. doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01293-z.
  • Lucey CR, Hauer K, O’Sullivan P, Poncelet A, Souza KH, Davis J. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2020;95:S70–S73. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003469.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.