Temporary and Permanent Viscosity Loss Correlated to Hydraulic System Performance

References

• Selby, T. W. (1958), “The Non-Newtonian Characteristics of Lubricating Oils,” ASLE Transactions, 1(1), pp 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mary, C., Phillipon, D., Lafarge, L., Laurent, D., Rondelez, F., Bair, S., and Vergne, P. (2013), “New Insight into the Relationship between Molecular Effects and the Rheological Behavior of Polymer-Thickened Lubricants under High Pressure,” Tribology Letters, 52(3), pp 357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covitch, M. J., and Trickett, K. J. (2015), “How Polymers Behave as Viscosity Index Improvers in Lubricating Oils,” Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 5(2), pp 134–151.
   Google Scholar
• Ramasamy, U. S., Lichter, S., and Martini, A. (2016), “Effect of Molecular-Scale Features on the Polymer Coil Size of Model Viscosity Index Improvers,” Tribology Letters, 62, 23-1–23-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Len, M., Ramasamy, U. S., Lichter, S. and Martini, A. (2018), “Thickening Mechanisms of Polyisobutylene in Polyalphaolefin”, Tribology Letters, 66, 5-1–5-9
   Google Scholar
• Kinker, B. G. (2012), “Fluid Viscosity and Viscosity Classification,” Handbook of Hydraulic Fluid Technology, 2nd ed., Totten, G. E. and DeNegri, V. J. (Eds.), CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D7109-12. (2012), Standard Test Method for Shear Stability of Polymer Containing Fluids Using a European Diesel Injector Apparatus at 30 and 90 Cycles, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, M., Rein, S., Roth, G., and Marshall, H. (1969), “An Automated Fuel Injector Shear Stability Tester,” SAE Technical Paper 690158.
   Google Scholar
• Hydnman, C. W., Kinker, B. G., and Placek, D. G. (2001), “The Importance of Shear Stability in Multigraded Hydraulic Fluids,” Hydraulic Failure Analysis: Fluids, Components and System Effects, ASTM STP 1339, Totten, G. E., Wills, D. K., and Feldmann, D. (Eds.), American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6080-12a. (2012), Standard Practice for Defining the Viscosity Characteristics of Hydraulic Fluids, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5621-07. (2013), Standard Test Method for Sonic Shear Stability of Hydraulic Fluids, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Stambaugh, R., and Kopko, R. (1973), “Behavior of Non-Newtonian Lubricants in High Shear Rate Applications,” SAE Technical Paper 730487.
   Google Scholar
• Neveu, C. D., Herzog, S. N., Hyndman, C. W., and Simko, R. P. (2007), “Achieving Efficiency Improvements through Hydraulic Fluid Selection: Laboratory Prediction and Field Evaluation,” Proceedings of the STLE Annual Meeting (Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers), May 6–10, STLE: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• SAE J306. (2017), Automotive Gear Lubricant Viscosity Classification, SAE International: Warrendale, PA.
   Google Scholar
• CEC L-45-99. (2014), Viscosity Shear Stability of Transmission Lubricants (Taper Roller Bearing Rig), Coordinating European Council: Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Krupka, I., Bair, S., Kumar, P., Svoboda, P., and Hartl, M. (2011), “Mechanical Degradation of the Liquid in an Operating EHL Contact,” Tribology Letters, 41, pp 191–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. T., and Lewis, T. I. (1996), “Vickers' 35VQ25 Pump Test,” Tribology of Hydraulic Pump Testing, Totten, G. E., Kling, G. H., and Spolenski, D. J. (Eds.), American Society of Testing and Materials: Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Schober, B., Zhao, H., and Bealko, S. (2013), “Extended Pump Shearing of Hydraulic Fluids,” Proceedings of the STLE Annual Meeting and Exhibition 2013, May 5–9, Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzinger, J., Green, J., Lamb, G., Atkinson, D., and Spikes, H. (2012), “New Method of Measuring Permanent Viscosity Loss of Polymer-Containing Lubricants,” Tribology Transactions, 55(5), pp 631–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE J300. (2015), Engine Oil Viscosity Classification, SAE International: Warrendale, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4683-17. (2017), Standard Test Method for Measuring Viscosity of New and Used Engine Oils at High Shear Rate and High Temperature by Tapered Bearing Simulator Viscometer at 150, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4741-17. (2017), Standard Test Method for Measuring Viscosity at High Temperature and High Shear Rate by Tapered-Plug Viscometer, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5481-13. (2013), Standard Test Method for Measuring Apparent Viscosity at High-Temperature and High-Shear Rate by Multicell Capillary Viscometer, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, N., Ponjavic, A., Taylor, R. I., and Spikes, H. A. (2017), “Study of Permanent Shear Thinning of VM Polymer Solutions,” Tribology Letters, 65, 106-1–106-15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P., Pantar, A. V., Rao, U. S., and Sarma, A. S. (1998), “Shear Stability of Polymers Used as Viscosity Modifiers in Lubricating Oils,” Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, 5, pp 309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P., Das, T., and Nandi, D. (2011), “Shear Stability and Thickening Properties of Homo and Copolymer of Methyl Methacrylate,” American Journal of Polymer Science, 1(1), pp 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, T. (2008), “The Expanding Dimensions of High Shear Rate Viscometry,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1621.
   Google Scholar
• Covitch, M., Brown, M., May, C., Selby, T., Goldmints, I., and George, D. (2010), “Extending SAE J300 to Viscosity Grades below SAE 20,” SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 3(2), pp 1030–1040.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, K., Andersson, P., Nylund, N.-O., Mäkelä, K., and Erdemir, A. (2014), “Global Energy Consumption Due to Friction in Trucks and Buses,” Tribology International, 78, pp 94–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, M., and Murphy, C. (1978), “Temporary Viscosity Loss and Its Relationship to Journal Bearing Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 780374.
   Google Scholar
• (2016), Confidence Report on Low-Viscosity Engine Lubricants, North American Council for Freight Efficiency. Available at: http://truckingefficiency.org/sites/truckingefficiency.org/files/reports/trucking_lubricants_final.pdf (accessed August 29, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• ISO 4409. (2007), Hydraulic Fluid Power—Positive Displacement Pumps, Motors and Integral Transmissions—Methods of Testing and Presenting Basic Steady State Performance, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Seeton, C. J. (2006), “Viscosity–Temperature Correlations for Liquids,” Tribology Letters, 22(1), pp 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. E. (1950), Positive Displacement Pumps and Fluid Motors, Pitman Publishing: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schlösser, W. (1961), “Mathematical Model for Dis-Placement Pumps and Motors,” Hydraulic Power Transmission, pp 252–257, 269.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O. (1973), Mathematical Efficiency Model, Kompendium i Hydraulik, Institute of Technology: Linköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H.-S. (2007), “A Novel Performance Model Given by the Physical Dimensions of Hydraulic Axial Piston Motors: Model Derivation,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21(1), pp 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. J., and Steward, B. L. (2014), “Comparison of Steady State Flow Loss Models for Axial Piston Pumps,” Proceedings of the 53rd National Conference on Fluid Power, March 5–7, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Mettakadapa, S., Bair, S., Aoki, S., Kobessho, M., Carter, L., Kamimura, H., and Michael, P. (2015), “A Fluid Property Model for Piston Pump Case Drain and Pressure Compensator Flow Losses,” Proceedings of the AMSE/BATH 2015 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, October 12–14, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, S., and Michael, P. (2010), “Modelling the Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Viscosity and Volume for Hydraulic Fluids,” International Fluid Power Journal, 11(2), pp 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Stelson, K. A., and Wang, F. (2010), “A Simple Model of Piston–Cylinder Gap Efficiency in Positive-Displacement Hydraulic Pumps and Motors,” Proceedings of the Bath/ASME Symposium on Fluid Power & Motion Control, September 15–17, Bath, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hibi, A., and Ichikawa, T. (1977), “Mathematical Model of the Torque Characteristics for Hydraulic Motors,” Bulletin of JSME, 20(143), pp 616–621.
   Google Scholar
• Bramer, J., Puzzuoli, A., Michael, P., and Wanke, T. (2014), “Hydraulic Fluid Efficiency Effects in External Gear Pumps,” Proceedings of the 53rd National Conference on Fluid Power, March 5–7, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, P., Mettakadapa, S., and Shahahmadi, S. (2016), “An Adsorption Model for Hydraulic Motor Lubrication,” Journal of Tribology, 138(1), 14503-1–14503-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar