Fish predation on newly stocked juvenile predatory fish in a biomanipulated reservoir

References

• Adámek Z, Mikl L, Šlapanský L, Jurajda P, Halačka K. 2019. The diet of predatory fish in drinking water reservoirs—how can they contribute to biomanipulation efforts? Folia Zool. 68(4):215–224. doi: 10.25225/fozo.014.2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft. 67(1):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benndorf J. 1987. Food web manipulation without nutrient control: a useful strategy in lake restoration? Schweiz Z Hydrol. 49(2):237–248. doi: 10.1007/BF02538505.
   Google Scholar
• Beyerle GB. 1971. A study of two northern pike—bluegill populations. Trans Am Fish Soc. 100(1):69–73. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1971)100<69:ASOTNP>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blabolil P, Bartoň D, Halačka K, Kočvara L, Kolařík T, Kubečka J, Šmejkal M, Peterka J. 2019. The fate of 0+ asp (Leuciscus aspius) after being stocked in a reservoir. Biologia. 75(7):989–996. doi: 10.2478/s11756-019-00355-3.
   Google Scholar
• Blabolil P, Duras J, Jůza T, Kočvara L, Matěna J, Muška M, Říha M, Vejřík L, Holubová M, Peterka J. 2018. Assessment of burbot Lota lota (L. 1758) population sustainability in central European reservoirs. J Fish Biol. 92(5):1545–1559. doi: 10.1111/jfb.13610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR. 1985. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience. 35(10):634–639. doi: 10.2307/1309989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čech M, Vejřík L. 2011. Winter diet of great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) on the river Vltava: estimate of size and species composition and potential for fish stock losses. Folia Zool. 60(2):129–142. doi: 10.25225/fozo.v60.i2a7.2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowx IG. 1999. An appraisal of stocking strategies in the light of developing country constrains. Fish Manage Ecol. 6(1):21–34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2400.1999.00139.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fonken DR, Conner MM, Walsworth TE, Thompson PD. 2023. Benefits of stocking fewer but larger individuals with implications for native fish recovery. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 80 (3):439–450. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2022-0071.
   Google Scholar
• Frankiewicz P, Dabrowski K, Martyniak A, Zalewski M. 1999. Cannibalism as a regulatory force of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), population dynamics in the lowland Sulejów reservoir (Central Poland). Hydrobiologia. 408/409:47–55. doi: 10.1023/A:1017001803791.
   Google Scholar
• Guillerault N, Hühn D, Cucherousset J, Arlinghaus R, Skov C. 2018. Stocking for pike population enhancement. In: Skov C, Nilsson PA, editors. Biology and ecology of pike. CRC Press. p. 215–247. doi: 10.1201/9781315119076-12.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren K. 1999. Between-year variation community structure and biomass-size distributions of benthic lake fish communities. J Fish Biol. 55:535–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00698.x.
   Google Scholar
• Horký P, Slavík O, Bartoš L, Kolářová J, Randák T. 2006. The effect of the moon phase and seasonability on the behaviour of pikeperch in the Elbe River. Folia Zool. 55:411–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen TL, Davidson TA, Liu Z, Mazzeo N, Trochine C, Özkan K, Jensen HS, Trolle D, et al. 2012. Biomanipulation as a restoration tool to combat eutrophication: recent advances and future challenges. Adv Ecol Res. 47:411–487. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-398315-2.00006-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jůza T, Blabolil P, Čech M, Draštík V, Frouzová J, Sajdlová Z, Holubová M, Kočvara L, Kolařík T, Moraes KR, et al. 2022. Fish stock mass reduction is indicated in standard abundance and biomass estimates from gillnets and hydroacoustics. Fish Res. 253:106389. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106389.
   Google Scholar
• Jůza T, Blabolil P, Čech M, Draštík V, Hejzlar J, Kočvara L, Muška M, Peterka J, Sajdlová Z, Tušer M, et al. 2023. Distribution pattern, annual density changes, growth and mortality of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.1758)) fry following oligotrophication of a reservoir. Ecol Freshw Fish. 32(4):724–734. doi: 10.1111/eff.12718.
   Google Scholar
• Jůza T, Blabolil P, Čech M, Draštík V, Holubová M, Kočvara L, Kubečka J, Malinovskyi O, Policar T, Rychtecký P, et al. 2024. Assessing the efficacy of spring stocking of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) into eutrophic reservoirs. Lakes Reservoirs Manage. 40:196–204. doi: 10.1080/10402381.2024.2333298
   Google Scholar
• Jůza T, Vašek M, Kubečka J, Seďa J, Matěna J, Prchalová M, Peterka J, Říha M, Jarolím O, Tušer M, et al. 2009. Pelagic underyearling communities in a canyon-shaped reservoir in late summer. J Limnol. 68(2):304–314. doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2009.304.
   Google Scholar
• Lappalainen J, Olin M, Vinni M. 2006. Pikeperch cannibalism: effect of abundance, size and condition. Ann Zool Fennici. 43:35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehner T, Benndorf J, Kasprzak P, Koschel R. 2002. Biomanipulation of lake ecosystems: successful applications and expanding complexity in the underlying science. Freshw Biol. 47(12):2453–2465. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.01003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polis GA. 1988. Exploitation, competition and the evolution of interference, cannibalism, and intraguild predation in age/size-structured populations. In: Ebenham B, Persson L, editors. Size-structured populations—ecology and evolution. Berlin (Germany): Springer Verlag. p. 185–202. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.01003.x.
   Google Scholar
• Poulet N, Arzel C, Messad S, Lek S, Argillier C. 2005. Diel activity of adult pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) in a drainage canal in the Mediterranean basin during spring. Hydrobiologia. 543(1):79–90. doi: 10.1007/s10750-004-6823-6.
   Google Scholar
• Prchalová M, Kubečka J, Čech M, Frouzová J, Draštík V, Hohausová E, Jůza T, Kratochvíl M, Matěna J, Peterka J, et al. 2009. The effect of depth, distance from dam and habitat on spatial distribution of fish in an artificial reservoir. Ecol Freshw Fish. 18(2):247–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00342.x.
   Google Scholar
• Prchalová M, Kubečka J, Říha M, Litvín R, Čech M, Frouzová J, Hladík M, Hohausová E, Peterka J, Vašek M. 2008. Overestimation of percid fishes (Percidae) in gillnet sampling. Fish Res. 91(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Kubečka J, Peterka J, Čech M, Muška M, Kratochvíl M, Vašek M. 2010. Fish activity as determined by gillnets catch: a comparison of two reservoirs of different turbidity. Fish Res. 102(3):291–296. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.12.011.
   Google Scholar
• Prejs A, Martyniak A, Boroń S, Hliwa P, Koperski P. 1994. Food web manipulation in a small, eutrophic Lake Wirbel, Poland: effect of stocking with juvenile pike on planktivorus fish. Hydrobiologia. 275–276(1):65–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00026700.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2023. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Říha M, Prchalová M, Brabec M, Draštík V, Muška M, Tušer M, Bartoň D, Blabolil P, Čech M, Frouzová J, et al. 2023. Calibration of fish biomass estimates from gillnets: step towards broader application of gillnet data. Ecol Indic 153:110425. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110425.
   Google Scholar
• Saloniemi I, Jokikokko E, Kallio-Nyberg I, Jutila E, Pasanen P. 2004. Survival of reared and wild Atlantic salmon smolts: size matters more in bed years. ICES J Mar Sci. 61(5):782–787. doi: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.03.032.
   Google Scholar
• Seďa J, Devetter M. 2000. Zooplankton community structure along a trophic gradient in a canyon-shaped dam reservoir. J Plankton Res. 22(10):1829–1840. doi: 10.1093/plankt/22.10.1829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seda J, Hejzlar J, Kubecka J. 2000. Trophic structure of nine Czech reservoirs regularly stocked with piscivorous fish. Hydrobiologia. 429(1/3):141–149. doi: 10.1023/A:1004048415779.
   Google Scholar
• Seďa J, Kubečka J. 1997. Long-term biomanipulation of Římov Reservoir (Czech Republic). Hydrobiologia. 345:95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Šmejkal M, Bartoň D, Blabolil P, Podhorec P, Souza AT, Stejskal V, Stepanyshyna Y, Tapkir S. 2021. Does fish conditioning in aquaculture increase survival success in the wild? A case study on a cyprinid fish. Sustainability. 13(24):13936. doi: 10.3390/su132413936.
   Google Scholar
• Šmejkal M, Ricard D, Prchalová M, Říha M, Muška M, Blabolil P, Čech M, Vašek M, Jůza T, Herreras AM, et al. 2015. Biomass and abundance biases in European standard gillnet sampling. PLoS One. 10(5):e0128469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122437.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Søndegaard ME, Jeppesen E, Berg S. 1997. Pike (Esox lucius L.) stocking as a biomanipulation tool. 2. Effects on lower trophic levels in Lake Lyng (Denmark). Hydrobiologia. 342/343:319–325.
   Google Scholar
• Sutela T, Hyvärinen P. 2002. Diet and growth of stocked and wild 0+ pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.). Fish Manage Ecol. 9(1):57–63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2400.2002.00251.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tesfaye GC, Souza AT, Bartoň D, Blabolil P, Čech M, Draštík V, Frouzová J, Holubová M, Kočvara L, Kolařík T, et al. 2022. Long-term monitoring of fish in a freshwater reservoir: different ways of weighting complex spatial samples. Front Environ Sci. 10:1000087. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1000087.
   Google Scholar
• Vašek M, Eloranta AP, Vejříková I, Blabolil P, Říha M, Jůza T, Šmejkal M, Matěna J, Kubečka J, Peterka J. 2018. Stable isotopes and gut contents indicate differential resource use by coexisting asp (Leuciscus aspius) and pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Ecol Freshw Fish. 27:1054–1065. doi: 10.1111/eff.12414.
   Google Scholar
• Vašek M, Prchalová M, Peterka J, Ketelaars HAM, Wagenvoort AJ, Čech M, Draštík V, Říha M, Jůza T, Kratochvíl M, et al. 2013. The utility of predatory fish in biomanipulation of deep reservoirs. Ecol Eng. 52:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejřík L, Vejříková I, Blabolil P, Sajdlová Z, Kočvara L, Kolařík T, Bartoň D, Jůza T, Šmejkal M, Peterka J, et al. 2023. Trophic position of the species and site trophic state affect diet niche and individual specialization: from apex predator to herbivore. Biology (Basel). 12(8):1113. doi: 10.3390/biology12081113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wysujack K, Kasprzak P, Laude U, Mehner T. 2002. Management of pikeperch stock in a long-term biomanipulated stratified lake: efficient predation vs. low recruitment. Hydrobiologia. 479(1/3):169–180. doi: 10.1023/A:1021042308649.
   Google Scholar
• Wysujack K, Laude U, Anwand K, Mehner T. 2001. Stocking, population development and food composition of pike Esox lucius in the biomanipulated Feldberger Haussee (Germany)—implications for fisheries management. Limnologica. 31(1):45–51. doi: 10.1016/S0075-9511(01)80047-5.
   Google Scholar
• Yazıcıoğlu O, Yılmaz S, Yazıcı R, Erbaşaran M, Polat N. 2016. Feeding ecology and prey selection of European perch, Perca fluviatilis inhabiting a eutrophic lake in northern Turkey. J Freshw Ecol. 31(4):641–651. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2016.1220432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar