References
- Bateman, B. D., & Linden, M. A (1998). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (3rd Ed.). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
- Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (1999). Teaching every adolescent every day. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
- Ellis, E. (2001). Makes sense strategies—the works! [Computer software]. Tuscaloosa, AL: Masterminds Publishing.
- Glatthorn, A.A. (1994). Developing a quality curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Howard, J. B. (2001). Graphic representations as tools for decision-making. Social Education, 65(4), 220–223.
- Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools, Vol. II: No more walls (pp. 165–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Jonassen, D., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(1), 61–79.
- Kame’enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1999). Toward successful inclusion of students with disabilities: The architecture of instruction. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
- Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1991). Teaching students ways to remember. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
- North Carolina State University, Center for Universal Design (1997). The principles of universal design. Available: www.design.ncsu.edu:8120/cud/univ_design/principles/udprinciples.htm.
- Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief Fall 1998. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education and Council for Exceptional Children.
- Pisha, B., & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart from the start: The promise of universal design for learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 197–203.
- Riel, M., & Fulton, K. (2001). The role of technology in supporting learning communities. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 518–523.
- Rose, D. (2000a). Universal design for learning—Associate Editor Column. Journal of Special Education Technology [Online serial], 15(1). Available: http://jset.unlv.edu/15.1/asseds/rose.html.
- Rose, D. (2000b). Universal design for learning—Associate Editor Column. Journal of Special Education Technology [Online serial], 15(2). Available: http://jset.unlv.edu/15.2/asseds/rose.html.
- Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age. Aexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
- Stepien, W. J., & Pyke, S. L. (1997). Designing problem-based learning units. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(4), 380–400.
- Story, M. F., Mueller, J. L., & Mace, R. L. (1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, Center for Universal Design.
- Sylwester, R. (1995). A celebration of neurons: An educator’s guide to the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Asociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Tomlinson, C. A (1995). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.