The Role of Teacher Inquiry in Helping Prospective Teachers Untangle the Complexities of Technology Use in Classrooms

References

• Bondy, E., & Ross, D. D. (2005). Preparing for inclusive teaching: Meeting the challenge of teacher education reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Learning Point Associates. Naperville, IL. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/distance/k12distance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. W., Foster, A., & Mantle-Bromley, C. (2005). Hybrid educators and the simultaneous renewal of schools and the education of educators. Seattle, WA: Institution for Educational Inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, J. B. (1963). The education of American teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. M., & Bull, G. L. (1997). Technology and teacher education: Past practice and recommended directions. Action in Teacher Education, 19(2), 97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F., & Dawson, K. (2005). Fostering prospective and practicing teachers’ reflection on meaningful technology integration into instruction through teacher inquiry. Association of Teacher Education. Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F., & Silva, D. Y. (2003). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., & Dana, N. (2007). When curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences and teacher inquiry coalesce: An opportunity for conceptual change? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 656–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, K. (2006). Teacher inquiry: A vehicle to merge prospective teachers’ experience and reflection during curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 265–292.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., & Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Commentary: Expanding notions of acceptable research evidence in educational technology: A Response to Schrum et al. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 6(1). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss1/general/article2.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K. (2005). Preparing preservice teachers to use technology: Are authentic experiences enough? National Educational Computing Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., & Nonis, A. (2000). Preservice teachers’ experiences in a k-12/university technology-based field initiative: Benefits, facilitators, constraints and implications for teacher educators. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(1), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., Pringle, R., & Adams, T. (2003). Providing links between technology integration, methods courses and traditional field experiences: Implementing a model of curriculum-based and technology-enhanced microteaching. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(1), 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Dexter, S., & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college’s walls. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 334–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs: The Final Frontier in Our Quest for Technology Integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(4), 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazewski, K., Brush, T., & Berg, K. (2002). Integrating technology into preservice teacher education: Comparing a field-based model with a traditional approach. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2002 (pp. 1968–1972). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K., Strudler, N., & Odell, S. (2004). Mentoring toward technology use: Cooperating teacher practice in supporting student teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher researchers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. M., & Lock, J. V. (2004). Technology and teacher education for a knowledge era: Mentoring for student futures, not our past. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2004). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach: Waveland Pr Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., Wenger, E., & Pea, R. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive & computational perspectives). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. J., Byrd, D. M., & Foxx, S. M. (1996). Field and laboratory experiences. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the association of teacher educators (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
   Google Scholar
• NCATE. (1997). Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Washington, D.C.: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• NCATE. (2002). NCATE: The standard of excellence in teacher education. Available: http://www.ncate.org/ March 25,2002].
   Google Scholar
• O’Bannon, B., & Nonis, A. (2002). A field-based initiative for integrating technology in the content areas: Using a team approach to preparing preservice teachers use technology. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2002 (pp. 1394–1397). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• O’Bannon, B., & Judge, S. (2005). Implementing partnerships across the curriculum with technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind: The false promise of technology in the classroom and how learning can be saved. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J. (2005). Field experiences: A guide to reflective teaching (6th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Radinsky, J., Lawless, K., & Smolin, L. I. (2005). Developing technology-integrated field experience sites in urban schools: Approaches, assumptions, and lessons learned. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5(2). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss2/currentpractice/articlel.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. (2003). Field experiences in instructional technology: Take a field trip to the k-12 schools. Presented at EERA February 28, 2003. Available at http://pages.towson.edu/pryan/field/
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A. (2001). Simultaneous renewal in teacher education: Strategies for success. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Schrum, L. (2005). Editorial: A proactive approach to a research agenda for educational technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Schrum, L., Thompson, A., Sprague, D., Maddux, C., McA-near, A., Bell, L., & Bull, G. (2005). Advancing the field: Considering acceptable evidence in educational technology research. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5(3/4). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss3/editorial/articlel.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2002). Integrating technology into teacher candidates’ field experiences: A two-pronged approach. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(2), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (1998). Lessons from exemplary teacher education programs. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. (1999). National educational technology standards project. Retrieved November 3, 1999, from http://cnets.iste.org
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. D. (2005). Scientifically based research: Establishing a research agenda for the technology in teacher education community. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 37(4), 331–227.
   Google Scholar
• USDOE. (2001, August 24, 1999). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology. Retrieved February 15, 2001, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/teachtech/
   Google Scholar
• Yendol-Hoppey, D., Dawson, K., Dana, N., League, M., Jacobs, J., & Malik, D. (in press). Professional Development Communities: Vehicles for Re-shaping Field Experiences to Support School Improvement. Florida Journal of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (1996). Teachers as reflective practitioners and the democratization of school reform. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Current reforms in preservice teacher education (pp. 199–214). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar