Cross-Validating Measures of Technology Integration

References

• Baker, E., Herman, J., & Gearhart, M. (1988). The Apple classrooms of tomorrow: 1988 evaluation study (Report to Apple Computer). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1976). Implementation of educational innovation. The Educational Forum, 40(3) 345–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, R. (1997). Effect of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and their students. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas. [Online]. Available: http://courseweb.tac.unt.edu/rhondac.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1996). Constructing the teachers’ attitudes toward computers (TAC) Questionnaire. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED398244).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1999). Stages of adoption for technology in education. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 11(3), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2001a). Instruments for assessing the impact of technology in education. In Assessment/evaluation in educational information technology, Computers in the Schools, 18(2/3/4), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2001b). Profiling teacher stages of adoption for technology integration. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 13(3), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2001c) Strategies for Integrating Technology into the Classroom. Techologia y Communication Educativas, 33, ILCE-Mex. Enero-Junio 2001, pp. 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., Parker, D., & Knezek. (2005). Pathway for Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers to Infuse Technology. Computers in the Schools: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 23, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. (2002). Virtual and distance education in American schools. In M. G. Moore and W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education, pp. 673–699. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park.
   Google Scholar
• Dreschel, T. W. (1996). NASA Kennedy Space Center Educators Workshops: Exploring their impacts on teacher attitudes and concerns. NASA Technical Memorandum # 112241, The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, J. F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership. April.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership 48(8), 45–52. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 425 608)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacquinta, J. B. (1973). The process of organizational change in schools. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 1, pp. 178–208). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., & Christensen, R. (1999). Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Levels of Use of an Innovation (CBAM-LOU). Denton, TX: Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, N., & Herriott, R. E. (Eds.). (1979). The dynamics of planned educational change. Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., (1979). The concerns-based approach to facilitating change. Educational Horizons, 57, 202–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., & Rutherford, W. L. (1974). Concerns questionnaire. Procedures for Adopting Educational Innovations/CBAM Project. R&D Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G., George, A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1986). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC Questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G., George, A., & Rutherford, W. (1998). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC Questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research, 28, 531–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2000). Refining best teaching practices for technology integration: KIDS project findings for 1999— 2000. Denton, TX: Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning (IITTL).
   Google Scholar
• Loucks, S. F., Newlove, B. W., & Hall, G. E. (1975). Measuring levels of use of the innovation: A manual for trainers, interviewers, and raters. Austin: SEDL.
   Google Scholar
• Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation: A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, C. (2006). Cross-cultural validation of the will, skill, tool model of technology integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A. L. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naive adult email users. Computers in Education, 25(4), 173–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez-Bryant, N. & Shonkwiler, G., (2004). Central Nevada Technology Consortium(CNETC) 2003-2004 Evaluation Report. Retrieved April 12th, 2005 from http://www.unr.edu/cnetc/multimedia/pdf/year2_eval.pdf
   Google Scholar