Digital Natives As Preservice Teachers

References

• Bahr, D. L., Shaha, S. H., Fransworth, B. J., Lewis, V. K., & Benson, L. F. (2004). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology: Attitudinal impacts of technology-supported field experience on pre-service teacher candidates. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(2), 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. C., & Wade, M. (2004). Got game: How the gamer generation is reshaping business forever. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence, British Journal of Educational Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2009, from http://www.cheeps.com/karlmaton/pdf/bjet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, B. C., & Levin, J. A. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, M., & Castell, S., (1998) New technologies and the cultural ecology of primary schooling: Imagining teachers as Luddites. Educational Policy, 12(5), 542–567. Retrieved on February 12, 2009, from http://educ.ubc.ca/faculty/bryson/gentech/Luddites.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzycki, D., & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming barriers to technology use in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 619–641.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2005, December). The net generation goes to university? Paper presented at the Journalism Education Association Conference, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (1999). Professional development: A link to better learning. The CEO Forum School Technology and Readiness Report—Year Two. Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, P. & Zhao, Y. (2003). From Luddites to designers: Portraits of teachers and technology in political documents. In Zhao, Y. (Ed.), What should teachers know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1999). The technology puzzle. Education Week, 4, August, 47, 68. Retrieved on February 12, 2009, from www.edweek.org/ew/vol-18/43cuban.hl8
   Google Scholar
• Culp, K.M., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2003) A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/20years.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles: Implications for investments in faculty and technology. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 15.1–15.22). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved August 31, 2008, from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
   Google Scholar
• Dutt-Doner, K., Allen, S. M., & Corcoran, D. (2005). Transforming student learning by preparing the next generation of teachers for type II technology integration. Computers in the Schools, 22(314), 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. S., Yang, M. S., & Nathanson, A. I. (2006). Children of the net: An empirical exploration into the evaluation of Internet content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Week. (2005). Technology counts 2005: Electronic transfer: Moving technology dollars to new directions. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/05/05/35tracking.h24.html
   Google Scholar
• Education Week. (2007). Technology counts 2007. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.edweek.org/media/ew/tc/2007/tc07_press_release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Conklin, D., Lewandowski, J., Osika, E., Selo, M., & Wignall, E. (2003). Increasing preservice teachers? Capacity for technology integration through the use of electronic models. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Eteokleous, N. (2008). Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 669–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Generation YES. (n.d.). GenYES—A proven model for schoolwide technology integration. Retrieved August 31, 2008, from http://www.genyes.com/programs/genyes/whatis
   Google Scholar
• Groth, L. A, Dunlap, K. L., & Kidd, J. K. (2007). Becoming technologically literate through technology integration in PK-12 preservice literacy courses: Three case studies. Reading Research and Instruction, 46(4), 363–386.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, R. X., Dobson, T., & Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: An analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. B., & Grandgenet, N. (1996). Correlates among teachers’ anxieties, demographics, and telecomputing activity. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3). 300–317.
   Google Scholar
• Heverly, R. A. (2008). Growing up digital: Control and the pieces of a digital life. Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected. In T. McPherson (Eds.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning (pp. 199–218). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hruskocy, C., Cennamo, K. S., Ertmer, P. A., & Johnson, T. (2000). Creating a community of technology users: Students become technology experts for teachers and peers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. (2003). New study finds children age zero to six spend as much time with TV, computers, and video games as playing outside. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved September 2, 2008, from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/entmedia102803nr.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Kvavik, R. B., Caruso, J. B., & Morgan, G. (2004). ECAR study of students and information technology 2004: Convenience, connection, and control. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved August 21, 2008, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0405/rs/ers0405w.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lei, J., Conway, P., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Digital pencils: One-to-one computing in schools. Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between digital savvy students and their schools. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.pewinternet.org/report_display.asp?r=67
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Internet literacy: Young people’s negotiation of new online opportunities. Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected. In T. McPherson (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, (pp. 101–122). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lohnes, S., & Kinzer, C. (2007). Questioning assumptions about students’ expectations for technology in college classrooms. Innovate, 3(5). Retrieved August 31, 2008, from http://www.in-novateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=431
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, R.B., Liu, X., & Timmons, V. (1997).Teachers, computers, and the Internet: The first stage of a community-initiated project for the integration of technology into the curriculum. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43(4), 222–234.
   Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G. A. (1989. Measuring computer anxiety: The computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 733–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale, T. (2005). Portrait of a digital native. Technology & Learning, 26(2), 33–34. Retrieved August 25, 2008, from http://www.techlearning.com/showArticle.php?articleID=170701917
   Google Scholar
• McInerney, V., McInerney, D. M., & Sinclair, K. E. (1994). Student teachers, computer anxiety and computer experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(1), 27–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Lnternet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2005. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007020
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (1997). Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21^st-century classroom. Retrieved August 16, 2008, from http://www.ncate.org/public/technology21.asp?ch=113
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, B. (2006). On your mark, get set, wait! Are your teacher candidates prepared to embed assistive technology in teaching and learning? College Student Journal, 40(3), 485–494.
   Google Scholar
• NetDay. (2006). Our voice, our future: Student and teacher views on science, technology, and education. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from https://www.nacs.org/whitepapers/NETDAYSpeakUpReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. D. (1996). Mad rushes into the future: The overselling of educational technology. Educational Leadership, 54(3).
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology making the connection. Washington, DC: United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps towards understanding the net generation. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved August 31, 2008, from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
   Google Scholar
• Paivi, H. (1992, June). Changes in computer anxiety in a required computer course. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Enschede, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. (2007). “Digital immigrants" teaching “digital natives.” Harvard News Office, June 7, 2007. Retrieved September 2, 2008, from http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2007/06.07/11-berkman.html
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001a, September/October). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001b, November/December). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2006a). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8–13. Retrieved August 25, 2008, from http://www.ascd.org/authors/ed_lead/el200512_prensky.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2006b). “Don’t bother me Mom—L’m learning!”’St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L. (2006) Digital “natives” invade the workplace. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/70/digital-natives-invade-the-workplace
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8—18-year-olds. Washington, DC: A Kaiser Family Foundation Report. Retrieved May 28, 2007, from: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, I. G. (1999). New teachers and technology: Are they prepared? Technology and Learning 19(8), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Shifrin, D. (2006). Effect of media on children and adolescents: It’s about time. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Special Issue, Media and Children, 160, 448–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stead, G. (2006). Mobile technologies: Transforming the future of learning. Becta ICT Research Emerging Technologies for Learning. Retrieved August 23, 2007, from http://www.becta.org.uk/corporate/publications/documents/Emerging_Technologies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, J. (2006). Going pro: Schools embrace video production and videoconferencing. Technology & Learning, 26(7), 32.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• UCLA Center for Communication Policy. (2003). The UCLA Internet report—Surveying the digital future. Retrieved August 25, 2008, from http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/InternetReport-YearThree.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Education. (1996). Getting Americas students ready for the 21st century—Meeting the technology literacy challenge. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2000). E-learning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2002). The twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Education. (2004). The National Educational Technology Plan. Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology program (PT3). Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/teachtech/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Waters, J. (2008). How geek became chic. T.H.E. Journal, 35(2), 48–50, 52–53.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., & Hanson-Baldauf, D. (2008). E-mail in academia: Expectations, use, and instructional impact. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(1), 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. (2006). Recognizing the generational divide: When X meets Y at the tribal college. Tribal College Journal of American Indian Higher Education, 17(4), 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, R., & Logan, H. (2008). Computer use by preschool children: Rethinking practice as digital natives come to preschool. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(1), 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L., (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar