Articulating What Infants Attune to in Native Speech

References

• Anderson, J. L., Morgan, J. L., & White, K. S. (2003). A statistical basis for speech sound discrimination. Language and Speech, 46, 155–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslin, R. N., & Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 2, pp. 67–96). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auban, J., & Ménard, L. (2006). Compensation for a labial perturbation: An acoustic and articulatory study of child and adult French speakers. Proceedings of International Symposium on Speech Production (ISSP). Ubatuba, Brazil: CEFALA.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz-Zadeh, L., Iacoboni, M., Zaidel, E., Wilson, S., & Mazziotta, J. (2004). Left hemisphere motor facilitation in response to manual action sounds. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2609–2612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The Celex lexical database. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T. (1993). Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-native speech contrasts: A window on early phonological development. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. MacNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 289–304). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T. (1994). Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English. In C. Rovee-Collier, & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 9, pp. 217–304). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 167–200). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T. (in press). Perceiving non-native click consonant contrasts. In B. Sands (Ed.), The handbook of click languages. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., Kroos, C. H., & Irwin, J. (2010). Now I see what you said: Infant sensitivity to place congruency between audio-only and silent-video presentations of native and nonnative consonants. Proceedings of AVSP (AudioVisual Speech Perception). Hakone, Japan: AVISA.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., Kroos, C. H., & Irwin, J. (2011). Do infants detect A→V articulator congruency for nonnative click consonants? Proceedings of AVSP (AudioVisual Speech Perception). Volterra, Italy: AVISA.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., Kroos, C. H., & Irwin, J. (2014, July). Baby steps in perceiving articulatory foundations of phonological contrasts: Infants detect audio→video congruency in native and nonnative consonants. Paper presented at Laboratory Phonology, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., & McRoberts, G. W. (2003). Infant perception of nonnative consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language & Speech, 46, 183–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). American listeners' perception of nonnative consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to English phonology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1097, 775–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., LaFleur, R., & Silver-Isenstadt, J. (1995). Divergent developmental patterns for infants' perception of two non-native consonant contrasts. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. Munro, & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Second language speech learning (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, J., & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1992). Patterns in babbling: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 19, 51–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, L., & Ramon-Casas, M. (2011). Variability in vowel production by bilingual speakers: Can input properties hinder the early stabilization of contrastive categories? Journal of Phonetics, 39, 514–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. I. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: IV: Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299–2310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201–251.
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Les Cahiers de l'ICP: Bulletin de la Communication Parlée, 5, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruderer, A. G., Danielson, D. K., Kandhadai, P., & Werker, J. F. (2015). Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 13531–13536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, D., & Dodd, B. (2004). Auditory–visual speech integration by prelinguistic infants: Perception of an emergent consonant in the McGurk effect. Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 204–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. M., & Kent, R. (2010). Segmental production in Mandarin-learning infants. Journal of Child Language, 37, 341–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Striano, T., & Rakoczy, H. (2004). Auditory–oral matching behavior in newborns. Developmental Science, 7, 42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, A. (1970). A phonetic study of babbling. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 5, 110–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, S., Byers-Heinlein, C., & Werker, J. F. (2011). Bilingual beginnings as a lens for theory development: PRIMIR in focus. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 492–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2008). The abstract representations in speech processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1601–1619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B. L., & MacNeilage, P. F. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1199–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• d'Ausilio, A., Bufalari, I., Salmas, P., & Fadiga, L. (2009). The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology, 19, 381–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boysson-Bardies, B., Sagart, L., & Bacri, N. (1981). Phonetic analysis of late babbling: A case study of a French child. Journal of Child Language, 8, 511–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boysson-Bardies, B., Sagart, L., & Durand, C. (1984). Discernible differences in the babbling of infants according to target language. Journal of Child Language, 11, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Vihman, M. M. (1991). Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language, 67, 297–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boysson-Bardies, B., Vihman, M. M., Roug-Hellichius, L., Durand, C., Landberg, I., & Arao, F. (1992). Material evidence of infant selection from the target language: A cross-linguistic phonetic study. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 369–391). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2011). Do production patterns influence the processing of speech in prelinguistic infants? Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 590–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., & Nakai, S. (2013). The influence of babbling patterns on the processing of speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 642–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick, D., & Gick, B. (2013). Aerotactile integration from distal skin stimuli. Multisensory Research, 26, 405–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins, R. N., & Werker, J. F. (2004). Is the integration of heard and seen speech mandatory for infants? Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 187–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilers, R. E. (1977). Context-sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1321–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilers, R. E., Gavin, W., & Wilson, W. R. (1979). Linguistic experience and phonemic perception in infancy: A cross-linguistic study. Child Development, 50, 14–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilers, R. E., & Minifie, F. D. (1975). Fricative discrimination in early infancy. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 18, 158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilers, R. E., Wilson, W. R., & Moore, J. M. (1977). Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 20, 766–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., & Miller, J. L. (1980). Discrimination of information for manner of articulation. Infant Behavior and Development, 3, 367–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrand, O., Williams, K., & Lacerda, F. (2003). Does babbling sound native? Listener responses to vocalizations produced by Swedish and American 12- and 18-month-olds. Phonetica, 60, 17–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esling, J. H. (1996). Pharyngeal consonants and the aryepiglottic sphincter. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 26, 65–88.
   Google Scholar
• Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & Olivier, E. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others' action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. K., & Iverson, J. M. (2007). The influence of mouthing on infant vocalization. Infancy, 11, 191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, S. E., Davis, C., Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. (2015). The effect of modality and speaking style on the discrimination of non-native phonological and phonetic contrasts in noise. FAAVSP-2015, 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E. (1984). The effect of linguistic experience on Arabs' perception of the English /s/ vs. /z/ contrast. Folia Linguistica, 18, 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A. (2004). Speech as a supramodal or amodal phenomenon. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 189–201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Dekle, D. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 816–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Galantucci, B. (2008). The relation of speech perception and speech production. In D. B. Pisoni, & R. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 632–652). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., Rubin, P., Remez, R., & Turvey, M. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, 1: Speech and talk (pp. 373–420). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Wessels, J. M. (1993). Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, D. T., Kent, J. C., Mitoulas, L. R., & Hartmann, P. E. (2008). Tongue movement and intra-oral vacuum in breastfeeding infants. Early Human Development, 84, 471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P. K., Goldstein, L. M., & Narayanan, S. S. (2011). Processing speech signals using auditory-like filterbank provides least uncertainty about articulatory gestures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 4014–4022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, B., & Derrick, D. (2009). Aero-tactile integration in speech perception. Nature, 462, 502–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, B., Ikegami, Y., & Derrick, D. (2010). The temporal window of audio-tactile integration in speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, EL342–EL346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. M. (2003). Emergence of discrete gestures. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 15, 85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. M., Byrd, D., & Saltzman, E. (2006). The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. In M. A. Arbib (Ed.), Action to language via the mirror neuron system (pp. 215–249). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. M., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. In N. O. Schiller, & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 159–207). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. M., Nam, H., Kulthreshtha, M., Root, L., & Best, C. (2008, June). Distribution of tongue tip articulations in Hindi versus English and the acquisition of stop place categories. Paper presented at Laboratory Phonology 11, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P., & West, M. J. (2003). Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8030–8035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants' babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science, 19, 515–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, G. (1976). The roles of experience in the development of behavior and the nervous system. In G. Gottlieb (Ed.), Development of neural and behavioral specificity (pp. 1–35). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, G. (1981). The roles of experience in species-specific perceptual development. In R. N. Aslin, J. R. Alberts, & M. R. Peterson (Eds.), Development of perception: Psychobiological perspectives: Vol. 1. Audition, somatic perception and the chemical senses (pp. 5–44). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gros-Louis, J., West, M. J., Goldstein, M. H., & King, A. P. (2006). Mothers provide differential feedback to infants' prelinguistic sounds. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 509–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros-Louis, J., West, M. J., & King, A. P. (2016). The influence of interactive context on prelinguistic vocalizations and maternal responses. Language Learning & Development, 12, 280–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guion, S., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, Y., Hoashi, E., & Nara, T. (1997). Ultrasonographic analysis of sucking behavior of newborn infants: The driving force of sucking pressure. Early Human Development, 49(1), 33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, T. L., Morgan, K. A., & Kuhl, P. K. (1977). Speech perception in early infancy: Discrimination of fricative consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, S99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, O. C. (1947). Development of speech during infancy: Curve of phonemic frequencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 187–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin, O. C. (1948). Infant speech: Development of vowel sounds. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 13, 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Iwayama, K., & Eishima, M. (1997). Neonatal sucking behaviour and its development until 14 months. Early Human Development, 47(1), 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, T., Tiede, M., & Ostry, D. J. (2009). Somatosensory function in speech perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 1245–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton. ( English translation of R. Jakobson, 1941, Kindersprache, aphasie und allgemeine lautgesetze. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell).
   Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V. Y., & Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., & Luce, P. A. (1994). Infants′ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Fowler, C. A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 812–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kencalo, T. A., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Goldstein, L. M. (2007). Perception of native and non-native fricative contrasts by Ukrainian-Australian English bilinguals and Australian English monolinguals. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 40.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D., & Murray, A. D. (1982). Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6, and 9 months. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren-Portnoy, T., Majorano, M., & Vihman, M. M. (2009). From phonetics to phonology: The emergence of first words in Italian. Journal of Child Language, 36, 235–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, S., Davis, B. L., & Zink, I. (2009). From babbling to first words in four languages: Common trends, cross language and individual differences. In F. d’Errico & J.-M. Hombert (Eds.), Becoming eloquent: Advances in the emergence of language, human cognition and modern culture (pp. 205–232). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, E., Keysers, C. M., Umilta, A., Fogassi, L., Galles, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinaki, T., & Kugiumutzakis, G. (2000). Basic aspects of vocal imitation in infant-parent interaction during the first 6 months. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18, 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopczinski, G. (1990). Le langage émergent: Caractéristiques rythmiques [Emerging language: Rhythmic characteristics]. Hamburg, Germany: Buske Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K. (1993). Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: The native language magnet theory. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. MacNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 259–274). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T, Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 979–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the “critical period.” Language Learning and Development, 1, 237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1982). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science, 218, 1138–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1984). The intermodal representation of speech in infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 361–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2425–2438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13–F21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnerenko, E., Teinonen, T., Volein, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence of illusory audiovisual speech percept in human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11442–11445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky, R. E., Syrdal-Lasky, A., & Klein, R. E. (1975). VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 215–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. A. S., Davis, B., & MacNeilage, P. (2010). Universal production patterns and ambient language influences in babbling: A cross-linguistic study of Korean- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language, 37, 293–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Kim, S. I., Kawahara, S., & Lee, S. J. (2014). The ‘whistled’ fricative in Xitsonga: Its articulation and acoustics. Phonetica, 71, 50–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, A. G., & Aydelott Utman, J. G. (1992). From babbling towards the sound systems of English and French: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Child Language, 19, 19–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, A., Jusczyk, P. W., Murray, J., & Carden, G. (1988). Context effects in two-month-old infants' perception of labiodental/interdental fricative contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, A. G., & Wang, Q. (1991). Evidence for language-specific rhythmic influences in the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Language and Speech, 34, 235–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. (1985). The motor theory revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotto, A. J., Hickok, G. S., & Holt, L. L. (2009). Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 110–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKain, K. (1982). On assessing the role of experience on infants' speech discrimination. Journal of Child Language, 9, 527–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKain, K., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKain, K., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Spieker, S., & Stern, D. (1983). Infant intermodal speech perception is a left-hemisphere function. Science, 219, 1347–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeilage,, P. F., Davis, B. L., Kinney, A., & Matyear, C. L. (2000). The motor core of speech: A comparison of serial organization patterns in infants and languages. Child Development, 71, 153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampe, B., Friederici, A. D., Christophe, A., & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns' cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology, 19, 1994–1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W. (1984). Children's perception of visual and auditory speech. Child Development, 55, 1777–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyear, C. L., MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (1998). Nasalization of vowels in nasal environments in babbling: evidence for frame dominance. Phonetica, 55, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maye, J., Weiss, D. J., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Statistical phonetic learning in infants: Facilitation and feature generalization. Developmental Science, 11, 122–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101–B111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Bonatti, L. (2006). The “soul” of language does not use statistics: Reflections on vowels and consonants. Cortex, 42, 846–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Davis, B. L., Boë, L. J., & Roy, J. P. (2009). Producing American English vowels during vocal tract growth: A perceptual categorization study of synthesized vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1268–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343, 1006–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, A. R. (1971). Consonant cue perception by twenty-to twenty-four-week-old infants. Child Development, 717–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisik, S. R., & Esling, J. H. (2011). The ‘whole larynx’ approach to laryngeal features. Proceedings of ICPhS. Retrieved from https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Moisik/Moisik.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moran, G., Krupka, A., Tutton, A., & Symons, D. (1987). Patterns of maternal and infant imitation during play. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, P. A. (1972). The discrimination of speech and nonspeech stimuli in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14, 477–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möttönen, R., & Watkins, K. E. (2009). Motor representations of articulators contribute to categorical perception of speech sounds. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 9819–9825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugitani, R., Kobayashi, T., & Hiraki, K. (2008). Audiovisual matching of lips and non-canonical sounds in 8-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, H., Goldstein, L., & Saltzman, E. (2009). Self-organization of syllable structure: A coupled oscillator model. In F. Pellegrino, E. Marsico, I. Chitoran, & C. Coupé (Eds.), Approaches to phonological complexity (pp. 299–328). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Oller, D. K. (1980). The emergence of the sounds of speech in infancy. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 1, pp. 93–112). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oller, D. K. (2000). The emergence of the speech capacity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (1982). Similarity of babbling in Spanish- and English-learning babies. Journal of Child Language, 9, 565–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opie, I. (1951). Humpty-Dumpty. In I. Opie, & P. Opie (Eds.), The Oxford English dictionary of nursery rhymes (pp. 213–215). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oudeyer, P. Y. (2006). Self-organization in the evolution of speech. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papoušek, M., & Papoušek, H. (1989). Forms and functions of vocal matching in interactions between mothers and their precanonical infants. First Language, 9, 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Pegg, J. E., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Adult and infant perception of two English phones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3742–3753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46, 115–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polka, L., Colantonio, C., & Sundara, M. (2001). A cross-language comparison of /d/-/ð/ perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2190–2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons, F., Lewkowicz, D. J., Soto-Faraco, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). Narrowing of intersensory speech perception in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10598–10602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogalsky, C., Love, T., Driscoll, D., Anderson, S. W., & Hickok, G. (2011). Are mirror neurons the basis of speech perception? Evidence from five cases with damage to the purported human mirror system. Neurocase, 17, 178–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, L. D., Schmuckler, M. A., & Johnson, J. A. (1997). The McGurk effect in infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roug, L., Landberg, I., & Lundberg, L. J. (1989). Phonetic development in early infancy: A study of four Swedish children during the first eighteen months of life. Journal of Child Language, 16, 19–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sams, M., Möttönen, R., & Sihvonen, T. (2005). Seeing and hearing others and oneself talk. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 429–435.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sato, M., Troille, E., Ménard, L., Cathiard, M. A., & Gracco, V. (2013). Silent articulation modulates auditory and audiovisual speech perception. Experimental Brain Research, 227, 275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, J. G. (1873). The blind men and the elephant. In J. G. Saxe, The poems of John Godfrey Saxe (pp. 135–136). Boston MA: James R. Osgood.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, V. L., Yan, H. Y., & Datta, H. (2011). The development of English vowel perception in monolingual and bilingual infants: Neurophysiological correlates. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 527–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, R. (1980). Prespeech segmental feature development. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanaugh, & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 1, pp. 73–92). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman, I. J., Woods, D. R., & Tishman, A. (1981). Listener agreement on phonetic segments in early infant vocalizations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 593–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strafella, A. P., & Paus, T. (2000). Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport, 11, 2289–2292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeter, L. L. (1976). Language perception of two-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature, 259, 39–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1998). The particulate origins of language generativity: From syllable to gesture. In J. R. Hurford, J. R. M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases (pp. 202–221). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy, M. (2002). Mirror neurons, vocal imitation and the evolution of particulate speech. In M. I. Stamenov, & V. Gallese (Eds.), Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language (pp. 207–227). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Goldstein, L. (2003). Launching language: The gestural origin of discrete infinity. In M. Christiansen, & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 235–254). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Goodell, E. W. (1995). Gestures, features and segments in early child speech. In B. de Gelder, & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach (pp. 65–88). East Sussex, UK: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sundara, M., Namasivayam, A. K., & Chen, R. (2001). Observation-execution matching system for speech: A magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport, 12, 1341–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Genesee, F. (2006). Language-experience facilitates discrimination of /d-/ in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of English. Cognition, 100, 369–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundara, M., & Scutellaro, A. (2011). Rhythmic distance between languages affects the development of speech perception in bilingual infants. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 505–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2005). Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 86–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tees, R. C., & Werker, J. F. (1984). Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 38, 579[COMP]: Tees & Werker 1984 not in text. Add to text or delete from references.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenin, D. M., Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K., & Lavoie, L. (1985). Where's the drift in babbling drift? A cross-linguistic study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trehub, S. E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 47, 466–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2006). Perception of native and non-native affricate-fricative contrasts: Cross-language tests on adults and infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 2285–2294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, M. D., Best, C. T., Avesani, C., Bohn, O.-S., & Vayra, M. (2016). Perception of non-native guttural fricative place contrasts as perceived by native listeners of languages that differ in use of gutturals: English, Danish and Italian. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M. D., Best, C. T., Goldstein, L. M., & Antoniou, M. (2014). Contributions of native-language tuning and articulatory organs to infants' discrimination of native and nonnative consonant contrasts. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 210–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, S. L., & Vihman, M. M. (2007). Phonology in infancy and early childhood: Implications for theories of language learning. In M. Pennington (Ed.), Phonology in context (pp. 25–50). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (2002). Getting started without a system: From phonetics to phonology in bilingual development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihman, M., DePaolis, R. A., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2009). A dynamic systems approach to babbling and words. In E. L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 163–182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M., Macken, M. A., Miller, R., Simmons, H., & Miller, J. (1985). From babbling to speech: A re-assessment of the continuity issue. Language, 61, 397–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, K. E., & Paus, T. (2004). Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: The role of Broca's area. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 978–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, K. E., Strafella, A. P., & Paus, T. (2003). Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia, 41, 989–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, A. (2004). Category competition drives contrast maintenance within an exemplar-based production/perception loop. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Current themes in computational phonology and morphology (pp. 1–10). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Weikum, W. M., Oberlander, T. F., Hensch, T. K., & Werker, J. F. (2012). Prenatal exposure to antidepressants and depressed maternal mood alter trajectory of infant speech perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Suppl. 2), 17221–17227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Werker, J. F. (1989). On becoming a native listener. American Scientist, 77, 54–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F. (1991). The ontogeny of speech perception. In I. G. Mattingly, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the Motor Theory of speech perception (pp. 91–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197–234.
   Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1992). The organization and reorganization of human speech perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 377–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1999). Influences on infant speech processing: Toward a new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 509–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2005). Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology, 46(3), 233–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. H., Levitt, A. G., & Goldstein, L. (2007). VOT in the babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. H., Levitt, A. G., & Wang, Q. (1991). Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language, 18, 501–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. H., & Werker, J. F. (2013). Lip movements affect infants' audiovisual speech perception. Psychological Science, 24, 603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, K. A., Pons, F., Maye, J., & Werker, J. F. (2010). Distributional phonetic learning at 10 months of age. Infancy, 15, 420–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar