Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ecological Psychology Volume 29, 2017 - Issue 2: James J. Gibson's 1966 Book: 50 Years Later – Part 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
292
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Non-Modular Approach to Visual Space Perception

H. A. SedgwickDepartment of Biological and Vision Science, State College of Optometry, State University of New YorkCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Barbara GillamSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales
Pages 72-94 | Published online: 13 Apr 2017

References

  • Aloimonos, J., & Shulman, D. (1989). The integration of visual modules. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Andersen, G. J., Braunstein, M. L., & Saidpour, A. (1998). The perception of depth and slant from texture in three-dimensional scenes. Perception, 27, 1087–1106.
  • Barrow, H. G., & Tenenbaum, J. M. (1978). Recovering intrinsic scene characteristics from images. In A. Hanson & E. Riseman (Eds.), Computer vision systems (pp. 3–26). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Berkeley, G. (1910). A new theory of vision and other writings. New York, NY: Dutton. ( Original work published 1709)
  • Bertamini, M., Yang, T. L., & Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 673–682.
  • Blake, A., Bulthoff, H. H., & Sheinberg, D. (1993). Shape from texture: Ideal observers and human psychophysics. Vision Research, 33, 1723–1737.
  • Bradshaw, M. F., Hibbard, P. B., & Gillam, B. J. (2002). Perceptual latencies to discriminate surface orientation in stereopsis. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 32–40.
  • Bradshaw, M. F., & Rogers, B. J. (1996). The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth. Vision Research, 36, 3457–3468.
  • Bruno, N., & Cutting, J. E. (1988). Minimodularity and the perception of layout. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 161–170.
  • Bulthoff, H. H. (1991). Shape from X: Psychophysics and computation. In M. S. Landy & J. A. Movshon (Eds.), Computational models of visual processing (pp. 305–330). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bulthoff, H. H., & Mallot, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 1749–1758.
  • Constantine, L. L., & Barnett, T. O. (Eds.). (1968). Modular programming: Proceedings of a national symposium. Cambridge, MA: Information & Systems Press. Cited in Besnard, D., Gacek, C., & Jones, C. (2006). Structure for dependability: Computer-based systems from an interdisciplinary perspective. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Cutting, J. E., & Millard, R. T. (1984). Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 198–216.
  • Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69–117). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Danilova, M. V., & Mollon, J. D. (2003). Comparison at a distance. Perception, 32, 395–414.
  • Descartes, R. (1965). Discourse on method, optics, geometry, and meteorology (P. J. Olscamp, Trans.). New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill. ( Original work published 1637)
  • Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Tassinari, H. (2006). Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system. Vision Research, 46, 1707–1723.
  • Enright, J. T. (1991a). Exploring the third dimension with eye movements: Better than stereopsis. Vision Research, 31, 1549–1562.
  • Enright, J. T. (1991b). Stereo-thresholds: Simultaneity, target proximity and eye movements. Vision Reearch, 31, 2093–2100.
  • Flock, H. R. (1964). A possible optical basis of monocular slant perception. Psychological Review, 71, 380–391.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. ( Original work published 1979)
  • Gibson, J. J., Olum, P., & Rosenblatt, F. (1955). Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372–385.
  • Gillam, B. J. (1967). Changes in the directions of induced aniseikonic slant as a function of distance. Vision Research, 7, 777–783.
  • Gillam, B. J. (1968). Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: Experiments with aniseikonic lenses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 299–305.
  • Gillam, B. J. (1979). Even a possible figure can look impossible! Perception, 8, 229–232.
  • Gillam, B. J. (1995). The perception of spatial layout from static optical information. In W. Epstein, & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 23–67). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Gillam, B. J. (2007). Stereopsis and motion parallax [Guest editorial]. Perception, 36, 953–954.
  • Gillam, B. J. (2011). Occlusion issues in early Renaissance art. i-Perception, 2, 1076–1097.
  • Gillam, B. J., Blackburn, S., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: Metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours. Vision Research, 39, 493–502.
  • Gillam, B. J., Chambers, D., & Russo, T. (1988). Post-fusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 163–175.
  • Gillam, B. J., & Cook, M. L. (2001). Perspective based on stereopsis and occlusion. Psychological Science, 12, 424–429.
  • Gillam, B. J., Flagg, T., & Finlay, D. (1984). Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 559–564.
  • Gillam, B. J., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone. Vision Research, 39, 109–112.
  • Gillam, B. J., & Ryan, C. (1992). Perspective, orientation disparity and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception, 21, 427–439.
  • Gillam, B. J., Sedgwick, H. A., & Marlow, P. (2011). Local and non-local effects in surface-mediated stereoscopic depth reception. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–14.
  • Glennerster, A., & McKee, S. P. (1999). Bias and sensitivity of stereo judgements in the presence of a slanted reference plane. Vision Research, 39, 3057–3069.
  • Gogel, W. C. (1956). Relative visual direction as a factor in relative distance perceptions. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1–19.
  • Gogel, W. C. (1963). The visual perception of size and distance. Vision Research, 3, 101–120.
  • Goodenough, B., & Gillam, B. (1997). Gradients as visual primitives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 370–387.
  • Gulick, W. L., & Lawson, R. B. (1976). Human stereopsis: A psychophysical analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity or three- dimensional distance. Nature, 367, 173–175.
  • Helmholtz, H. V. (1962). Treatise on physiological optics (J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York, NY: Dover. ( Original work published 1925)
  • Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4, 967–992.
  • Hochberg, J. (1968). In the mind's eye. In R. N. Haber (Ed.), Contemporary theory and research in visual perception (pp. 309–331). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Holliday, I. E., & Braddick, O. J. (1991). Pre-attentive detection of a target defined by stereoscopic slant. Perception, 20, 355–362.
  • Horn, B. K. P. (1975). Obtaining shape from shading information. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 115–155). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Horn, B. K. P., & Brooks, M. J. (Eds.). (1989). Shape from shading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Humphrey, G. K., Symons, L. A., Herbert, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (1996). A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges. Behavioral Brain Research, 76, 117–125.
  • Ikeuchi, K., & Horn, B. K. P. (1989). Numerical shape from shading and occluding boundaries. In B. K. P. Horn, & M. J. Brooks (Eds.), Shape from shading (pp. 245–299). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kepler, J. (1962). Diotrice (J. P. C. Southall, Ed. & Trans.). New York, NY: Dover. ( Original work published 1611)
  • Kepler, J. (2000). Optics: Paralipomena to Witelo & optical part of astronomy (W. H. Donahue, Trans.). Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press. (Original work published 1604)
  • Knill, D. C. (1998). Surface orientation from texture: Ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues. Vision Research, 38, 1655–1682.
  • Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo ad texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 25, 2539–2558.
  • Koenderink, J. J. (1985). Space, form and optical deformations. In D. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D. Lee (Eds.), Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (pp. 31–58). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhof Publishers.
  • Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1976). Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsis. Biological Cybernetics, 21, 29–35.
  • Koyré, A. (1957). From the closed world to the infinite universe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
  • Li, A., & Zaidi, Q. (1999). Shape from natural textures. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 40, 398.
  • Marlow, P., & Gillam, B. J. (2011). Stereopsis loses dominance over relative size as target separation increases. Perception, 40, 1413–1427.
  • Marr, D. (1976). Early processing of visual information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 275, 483–519.
  • Marr, D. (1977). Analysis of occluding contour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 197, 441–475.
  • Marr, D. (1978). Representing visual information. In A. R. Hanson, & E. M. Riseman (Eds.), Computer vision systems (pp. 61–80). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
  • Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 200, 269–294.
  • Meng, J. C., & Sedgwick, H. A. (2001). Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1–15.
  • Meng, J. C., & Sedgwick, H. A. (2002). Distance perception across spatial discontinuities. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1–14.
  • Mitchison, G. J., & McKee, S. P. (1990). Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception. Vision Research, 30, 1781–1791.
  • Mitchison, G. J., & Westheimer, G. (1984). The perception of depth in simple figures. Vision Research, 24, 1063–1073.
  • Mon-Williams, M., & Bingham, G. P. (2008). Ontological issues in distance perception: Cue use under full cue conditions cannot be inferred from use under controlled conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 551–561.
  • Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn, & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nassi, J. J., & Callaway, E. M. (2009). Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 360–372.
  • Pankanti, S., & Jain, A. K. (1995). Integrating vision modules: Stereo, shading, grouping, and line labeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17, 831–842.
  • Purdy, W. C. (1960). The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence in space perception (General Electric Technical Information Series No. R60ELC56). Ithaca, NY: General Electric Advanced Electronics Center.
  • Regan, D., Beverley, K. J., & Cynader, M. (1979). Stereoscopic subsystems for position in depth and for motion in depth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 204, 485–501.
  • Rogers, B. J., & Graham, M. E. (1983). Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science, 221, 1409–1411.
  • Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 66, 386–408.
  • Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles of neurodynamics. Wahsington, DC: Spartan Books.
  • Saunders, J. A., & Chen, Z. (2015). Perceptual biases and cue weighting in perception of 3-D slant from texture and stereo information. Journal of Vision, 15, 1–24.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1973). The visible horizon: A potential source of visual information for the perception of size and distance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 7322530)
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1980). The geometry of spatial layout in pictorial representation. In M. Hagen (Ed.), The perception of pictures (Vol. 1, pp. 33–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1983). Environment-centered representation of spatial layout: Available visual information from texture and perspective. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 425–458). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 21-1–21-57). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1987a). Layout 2: A production system modeling visual perspective information. Proceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Computer Vision, London, UK.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1987b). A production system modeling high-level visual perspective information for spatial layout (Tech. Rep. No. 298). New York: New York University Department of Computer Science.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1989). Combining multiple forms of visual information to specify contact relations in spatial layout. In P. S. Shenker (Ed.), Sensor fusion II: Human and machine strategies. Proceedings of the SPIE, 1198, 447–458.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (2001). Visual space perception. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception (pp. 128–167). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Sedgwick, H. A. (2010). Spatial layout perception, psychophysical. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Sage encyclopedia of perception (pp. 908–914). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Sedgwick, H. A., & Levy, S. (1985). Environment-centered and viewer-centered perception of surface orientation. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31, 248–260.
  • Sinai, M. J., Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1998). Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance. Nature, 395, 497–500.
  • Todd, J. T., & Mingolla, E. (1983). Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 583–595.
  • Todd, J. T., & Reichel, F. D. (1989). Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces. Psychological Review, 96, 643–657.
  • Van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (1996). Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research, 36, 43–51.
  • Van Essen, D. C., Anderson, C. H., & Felleman, D. J. (1992). Information processing in the primate visual system: An integrated systems perspective. Science, 255, 419–423.
  • Vickers, D. (1971). Perceptual economy and the impression of visual depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 23–27.
  • Wardle, S. G., & Gillam, B. J. (2016). Gradients of relative disparity underlie the perceived slant of stereoscopic surfaces. Journal of Vision, 16, 1–13.
  • Welchman, A., Deubelius, A., Conrad, V., Bulthoff, H. H., & Kourtzi, Z. (2005). 3-D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 820–827.
  • Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision: I. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 128, 371–394.
  • Wirth, N. (1977). Modula: A language for modular multiprogramming. Software: Practice and Experience, 7, 1–35.
  • Wraga, M. (1999). Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 518–530.
  • Zeki, S. M. (1978). Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature, 274, 423–428.
  • Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.