420
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

Affordances in interaction – the case of Aikido

&
Received 19 Apr 2017, Accepted 27 Oct 2017, Accepted author version posted online: 13 Feb 2018
Accepted author version

References

  • Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Hristovski, R. (2006). The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 653–676.
  • Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), 32–47.
  • Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(4).
  • Bernstein, N. (1996). On Dexterity and Development. In M. L. Latash & M. T. Turvey (Eds.), Dexterity and its Development (pp. 1–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon.
  • Bourbousson, J., Sève, C., & McGarry, T. (2010a). Space–time coordination dynamics in basketball: Part 1. Intra- and inter-couplings among player dyads. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(3), 339–347.
  • Bourbousson, J., Sève, C., & McGarry, T. (2010b). Space–time coordination dynamics in basketball: Part 2. The interaction between the two teams. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(3), 349–358.
  • Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8.
  • Chemero, A. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ciompi, L., & Endert, E. (2011). Gefühle machen Geschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
  • Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. AVANT. Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej, (2), 85–93.
  • Creem-Regehr, S. H., Gagnon, K. T., Geuss, M. N., & Stefanucci, J. K. (2013). Relating spatial perspective taking to the perception of other's affordances: providing a foundation for predicting the future behavior of others. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7.
  • Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N. D., & Richardson, D. C. (2014). The self-organization of human interaction. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 59, pp. 43–95). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  • Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D., Balagué, N., Button, C., & Passos, P. (Eds.). (2014). Complex Systems in Sports. Milton Park: Routledge.
  • Davis, T. J. (2009). Perceiving Affordances for Joint Action. (MA thesis), University of Cincinnati.
  • Davis, T. J., Riley, M. A., Shockley, K., & Cummins-Sebree, S. (2010). Perceiving affordances for joint actions. Perception, 39(12), 1624–1644.
  • De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441–447.
  • Degenaar, J., & O'Regan, J. K. (2017). Sensorimotor Theory and Enactivism. Topoi, 36 (3), 393–407.
  • Di Paolo, E., & DeJaegher, H. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.
  • Dreyfus, H. L. (2007). Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1137–1160.
  • Dumas, G., Kelso, J. A. S., & Nadel, J. (2014). Tackling the social cognition paradox through multi-scale approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.
  • Eiler, B. A., Kallen, R. W., Harrison, S. J., & Richardson, M. J. (2013). Origins of Order in Joint Activity and Social Behavior. Ecological Psychology, 25(3), 316–326.
  • Esteves, P. T., de Oliveira, R. F., & Araújo, D. (2011). Posture-related affordances guide attacks in basketball. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 639–644.
  • Fajen, B. R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2009). Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40(1), 79.
  • Fogel, A. (1993). Developing Through Relationships. Origins of Communication, Self, and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Fogel, A. (2006). Dynamic systems research on interindividual communication: The transformation of meaning-making. Journal of Developmental Processes, 1(1), 7–30.
  • Fogel, A. (2011). Theoretical and applied dynamic systems research in developmental science: Dynamic systems research. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 267–272.
  • Froese, T., & Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 205–235.
  • Fusaroli, R., Perlman, M., Mislove, A., Paxton, A., Matlock, T., & Dale, R. (2015). Timescales of Massive Human Entrainment. Plos One, 10(4), e0122742.
  • Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147–157.
  • Gallotti, M., & Frith, C. D. (2013). Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 160–165.
  • Gaver, W. (1991). Technology Affordances. In S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson, & J. S. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI 91 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference April 28 – June 5 (pp. 79–84). New Orleans, Louisiana.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, London: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Granic, I., Dishion, T. J., & Hollenstein, T. (2003). The family ecology of adolescence: A dynamic systems perspective on normative development. Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence, 60–91.
  • Gray, W. (2004). Soft constraints in interactive behavior: the case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 359–382.
  • Harrison, S. J., & Stergiou, N. (2015). Complex adaptive behavior and dexterous action. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 19(4), 345.
  • Heft, H. (2001). Ecological Psychology in Context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the Legacy of William James's Radical Empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Heft, H. (2007). The social constitution of perceiver-environment reciprocity. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 85–105.
  • Hodges, B. H. (2009). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 628–652.
  • Hommel, B., & Nattkemper, D. (2011). Handlungspsychologie. Planung und Kontrolle intentionalen Handelns. Berlin: Springer.
  • Horton, T. E., Chakraborty, A., & St. Amant, R. (2012). Affordances for robots: a brief survey. AVANT. Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej, (2), 70–84.
  • Hristovski, R., Davids, K., & Araújo, D. (2006). Affordance-controlled bifurcations of action patterns in martial arts. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 10(4), 409–444.
  • Hristovski, R., Davids, K., & Araújo, D. (2009). Information for regulating action in sport: Metastability and emergence of tactical solutions under ecological constraints. In D. Araújo, H. Ripoll, & M. Raab (Eds.), Perspectives on cognition and action in sport (pp. 43–57). New York: Nova Science.
  • Hristovski, R., Davids, K., Araujo, D., & Passos, P. (2011). Constraints-induced emergence of functional novelty in complex neurobiological systems: a basis for creativity in sport. Nonlinear Dynamics-Psychology and Life Sciences, 15(2), 175.
  • Ibanez-Gijon, J., Diaz, A., Lobo, L., & Jacobs, D. M. (2013). On the ecological approach to information and control for roboticists. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 1.
  • Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Kelso, S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Kimmel, M. (2012). Intersubjectivity at close quarters: Shared, distributed, and superindividual imagery in tango argentino. Cognitive Semiotics, 4(1), 76–124.
  • Kimmel, M. (2016). Embodied “micro-“skills in tango improvisation – How a collaborative behavioral arc comes about. In F. Engel & S. Marienberg (Eds.), Out for a walk. Das Entgegenkommende Denken (pp. 57–74). Berlin: DeGruyter.
  • Kimmel, M. (2017a). A cognitive theory of joint improvisation: The case of tango argentino. In V. Midgelow (Ed.), Handbook of Dance Improvisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kimmel, M. (2017b). The complexity of skillscapes: Skill sets, synergies, and meta-regulation in joint embodied improvisation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 102–109). Bath.
  • Kimmel, M., Hristova, D., & Kussmaul, K. ( in prep.). Embodied agency as participatory decision making – A micro-phenomenological perspective on contact improvisation.
  • Kimmel, M., & Preuschl, E. (2015). Dynamic coordination patterns in tango argentino: A cross-fertilization of subjective explication methods and motion capture. In J.-P. Lachaud & N. Abe (Eds.), Dance Notations and Robot Motion (pp. 209–236). Berlin: Springer.
  • Kimmel, M., & Rogler, C. ( submitted). The anatomy of antagonistic coregulation: Emergent coordination, path dependency, and the interplay of parameters in Aikido.
  • Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.
  • Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power. How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mark, L. S. (2007). Perceiving the actions of other people. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 107–136.
  • Marsh, K. L. (2015). Social Ecological Context of Conversing. Ecological Psychology, 27(4), 310–334.
  • Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1217–1225.
  • Marsh, K., & Meagher, B. (2016). Affordances and interpersonal coordination. In P. Passos, K. Davids, & J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal coordination and performance in social systems (pp. 245–258). London & New York: Routledge.
  • McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215.
  • McGann, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self–other contingencies: Enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 417–437.
  • Nomikou, I., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2011). Language Does Something: Body Action and Language in Maternal Input to Three-Month-Olds. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 3(2), 113–128.
  • Oullier, O., & Kelso, S. J. A. (2009). Social coordination from the perspective of coordination dynamics. R.A. Meyers. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Sciences, 8198–8212.
  • Passos, P., Cordovil, R., Fernandes, O., & Barreiros, J. (2012). Perceiving affordances in rugby union. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(11), 1175–1182.
  • Passos, P., Davids, K., & Chow, J. Y. (Eds.). (2016). Interpersonal coordination and performance in social systems. New York.
  • Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one's subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 229–269.
  • Pezzulo, G., Barca, L., Bocconi, A. L., & Borghi, A. M. (2010). When affordances climb into your mind: Advantages of motor simulation in a memory task performed by novice and expert rock climbers. Brain and Cognition, 73(1), 68–73.
  • Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., & Renshaw, I. (2012). Metastability and emergent performance of dynamic interceptive actions. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 15(5), 437–443.
  • Reed, E. (1996). Encountering the world: toward an ecological psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Richardson, D. C., Washburn, A., Harrison, S. J., & Kallen, R. W. (2016). Symmetry and the dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In P. Passos, K. Davids, & J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal Coordination and Performance in Social Systems (pp. 65–81). New York: Routledge.
  • Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K., & Baron, R. M. (2007). Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 845–859.
  • Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. C. (2011). Interpersonal Synergies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2.
  • Saltzman, E., & Caplan, D. (2015). A graph-dynamic perspective on coordinative structures, the role of affordance-effectivity relations in action selection, and the self-organization of complex activities. Ecological Psychology, 27(4), 300–309.
  • Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G. (1992). Skill acquisition and development: The roles of state-, parameter-, and graph-dynamics. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(1), 49–57.
  • Saltzman, E., Nam, H., Goldstein, L., & Byrd, D. (2006). The distinction between state, parameter and graph dynamics in sensorimotor control and coordination. In M. L. Latash & F. Lestienne (Eds.), Motor Control and Learning (pp. 63–73). New York: Springer Publishing.
  • Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Scaffolds for social meaning. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 137–151.
  • Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition Beyond the Brain (pp. 195–221). London: Springer London.
  • Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, Habit and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill. Sport in Society, 10(5), 763–786.
  • Sutton, J., McIlwain, D., Christensen, W., & Geeves, A. (2011). Applying intelligence to the reflexes: Embodied skills and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 78–103.
  • Torrance, S., & Froese, T. (2011). An inter-enactive approach to agency: Participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality. Humana.Mente, 15, 21–53.
  • Torrents, C., Castañer, M., Dinušová, M., & Anguera, M. T. (2010). Discovering new ways of moving: Observational analysis of motor creativity while dancing contact improvisation and the influence of the partner. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(1), 53–69.
  • Torrents, C., Hristovski, R., Coterón, J., & Ric, A. (2016). Interpersonal coordination in Contact improvisation dance. In P. Passos, K. Davids, & J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal Coordination and Performance in Social Systems (pp. 94–108). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Torrents Martín, C., Ric, Á., & Hristovski, R. (2015). Creativity and emergence of specific dance movements using instructional constraints. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 65–74.
  • Travassos, B., Araújo, D., Davids, K., Vilar, L., Esteves, P., & Vanda, C. (2012). Informational constraints shape emergent functional behaviours during performance of interceptive actions in team sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(2), 216–223.
  • Tschacher, W., Schiepek, G., & Brunner, E. J. (Eds.). (1992). Self-Organization and Clinical Psychology (Vol. 58). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control. An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187.
  • Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (2011). Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1581), 3123–3132.
  • Vallacher, R. R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2010). Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems. American Psychologist, 65(4), 262–278.
  • van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2017). Foregrounding Sociomaterial Practice in Our Understanding of Affordances: The Skilled Intentionality Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
  • Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331–350.
  • Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683, 703.
  • Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358–389.
  • Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. The Royal Society.
  • Yamamoto, Y., Okumura, M., Yokoyama, K., & Kijima, A. (2016). Interpersonal coordination in competitive sports contests: martial arts. In P. Passos, K. Davids, &J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal Coordination and Performance in Social Systems (pp. 179–184). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Zukow-Goldring, P. (2006). Assisted imitation: affordances, effectivities, and the mirror system in early language development. In M. A. Arbib (Ed.), Action to Language Via the Mirror Neuron System (pp. 469–500). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge UP.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.