Perceptually Equivalent Judgments Made Visually and via Haptic Sensory-Substitution Devices

References

• Altman, J., & Cutter, J. (2004). Structured discovery cane travel. In D. W. Dew & G. M. Alan (Eds.), Contemporary issues in orientation and mobility:29th IRI 2004, Institute on Rehabilitation (pp. 67–96). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Arnoldussen, A., & Fletcher, D. C. (2012). Visual perception for the blind: The brainport vision device. Retinal Physician, 9, 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Auvray, M., & Myin, E. (2009). Perception with compensatory devices: From sensory substitution to sensorimotor extension. Cognitive Science, 33, 1036–1058. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01040.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avraham, G., Nisky, I., Fernandes, H. L., Acuna, D. E., Kording, K. P., Loeb, G. E., & Karniel, A. (2012). Toward perceiving robots as humans: Three handshake models face the Turing-like handshake test. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5, 196–207. doi:10.1109/TOH.2012.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C. C., Saunders, F. A., White, B., & Scadden, L. (1969). Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature, 221, 963–964. doi:10.1038/221963a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita, P., & Kercel, S. W. (2003). Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 541–546. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. S., & Cinelli, M. E. (2017). The effects of obstacle proximity on aperture crossing behaviors. Experimental Brain Research, 235, 497–506. doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4803-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barac-Cikoja, D., & Turvey, M. T. (1991). Perceiving aperture size by striking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 330–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barac-Cikoja, D., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Haptically perceiving size at a distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 347–370. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, E. H., Royster, L. H., Royster, J. D., Driscoll, D. P., & Layne, M. (Eds.). (2003). The noise manual, revised fifth edition. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, T. (1993). Care and feeding the long white cane: Instructions in cane travel for blind people. Future Reflections, 15, 2–66. Retrieved January 21, 2014 from https://nfb.org/Images/nfb/Publications/fr/fr15/Issue1/f1501tc.html
   Google Scholar
• Burton, G. (1992). Nonvisual judgment of the crossability of path gaps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 698–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, G. (1993). Non-neural extensions of haptic sensitivity. Ecological Psychology, 5, 105–124. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, G. (1994). Crossing without vision of path gaps. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 147–161. doi:10.1080/00222895.1994.9941669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, G., & Cyr, J. (2004). Gap crossing decisions in the sighted and visually impaired. Ecological Psychology, 16, 303–317. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1604_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancar, L., Diaz, A., Barrientos, A., Travieso, D., & Jacobs, D. M. (2013). Tactile-sight: A sensory substitution device based on distance-related vibrotactile flow. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10(272), 1–11. doi:10.5772/56235
   Google Scholar
• Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012). Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 51–62. doi:10.1038/nrn3136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carello, C., Thuot, S., Anderson, K., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Perceiving the sweet spot. Perception, 28, 307–320. doi:10.1068/p2716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F.-C., & Stoffregen, T. A. (2012). Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task at sea. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, T. J., Riley, M. A., Shockley, K., & Cummins-Sebree, S. (2010). Perceiving affordances for joint actions. Perception, 39, 1624–1644. doi:10.1068/p6712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, A., Barrientos, A., Jacobs, D. M., & Travieso, D. (2012). Action-contingent vibrotactile flow facilitates the detection of ground level obstacles with a partly virtual sensory substitution device. Human Movement Science, 31, 1571–1584. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2012.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen, T. (1971). Psychophysics I. Discrimination and detection. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg's experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 11–46). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Fajen, B. R., Diaz, G., & Cramer, C. (2011). Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances. Human Movement Science, 30, 504–533. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajen, B. R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2009). Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40, 79–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, L. W. (1978). Mobility devices. In R. L. Welsh & B. B. Blasch (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (pp. 47–118). New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.
   Google Scholar
• Fath, A. J., & Fajen, B. R. (2011). Static and dynamic visual information about the size and passability of an aperture. Perception, 40, 887–904. doi:10.1068/p6917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favela, L. H. (2016). Commentary: Purves, Morgenstern, & Wojtach. (2015). Perception and reality: Why a wholly empirical paradigm is needed to understand vision. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10(77), 1–3. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2016.00077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Favela, L. H., & Chemero, A. (2016). An ecological account of visual “illusions”. Florida Philosophical Review, 16(1), 68–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, P., Carello, C., Schmidt, R. C., & Corey, D. (1994). Haptic and visual perception of an affordance for upright posture. Ecological Psychology, 6, 265–287. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0604_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchak, J. M., Celano, E. C., & Adolph, K. E. (2012). Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion. Experimental Brain Research, 223, 301–310. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3261-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, T., McGann, M., Bigge, W., Spiers, A., & Seth, A. (2012). The Enactive Torch: A new tool for the science of perception. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5, 365–375. doi:10.1109/TOH.2011.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, T., & Spiers, A. (2007). Toward a phenomenological pragmatics of enactive perception. Enactive/07: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on enactive interfaces. Grenoble, Association ACROE, France, 105–108
   Google Scholar
• Fujikake, H., Higuchi, T., Imanaka, K., & Maloney, L. T. (2011). Directional bias in the body while walking through a doorway: Its association with attentional and motor factors. Experimental Brain Research, 210, 195–206. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2621-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler, W. S. (2011). Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research. Vision Research, 51, 771–781. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966/1983). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979/1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. S., & Rosenblum, L. D. (2004). Perception of sound-obstructing surfaces using body-scaled judgments. Ecological Psychology, 16, 87–113. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, P., Spencer, L., Arnoldussen, A., Hogle, R., Nau, A., Szlyk, J., … Seiple, W. (2016). The functional performance of the BrainPort V100 device in persons who are profoundly blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 110(2), 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson's affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336–342. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grespan, L., Froese, T., Di Paolo, E. A., Seth, A., Spiers, A., & Bigge, W. (2008). Investigating the role of movement in the constitution of spatial perception using the Enactive Torch. In E. Ruffaldi & M. Fontana (Eds.), Enactive/08: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on enactive interfaces (pp. 105–110). Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney, A. L., Cinelli, M. E., Denomme, L. T., & Frank, J. S. (2015). The effects of narrow and elevated path walking on aperture crossing. Human Movement Science, 41, 295–306. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2015.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackney, A. L., Cinelli, M. E., & Frank, J. S. (2014). Is the critical point for aperture crossing adapted to the person-plus-object system? Journal of Motor Behavior, 46, 319–327. doi:10.1080/00222895.2014.913002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haken, H. (1996). Principles of brain functioning: A synergetic approach to brain activity, behavior and cognition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, C., & Goff, D. P. (1974). Size constancy in extended haptic space. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 97–100. doi:10.3758/BF03205835
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi, T., Cinelli, M. E., Greig, M. A., & Patla, A. E. (2006). Locomotion through apertures when wider space for locomotion is necessary: Adaptation to artificially altered bodily states. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 50–59. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0525-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi, T., Cinelli, M. E., & Patla, A. E. (2009). Gaze behavior during locomotion through apertures: The effect of locomotion forms. Human Movement Science, 28, 760–771. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2009.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi, T., Murai, G., Kijima, A., Seya, Y., Wagman, J. B., & Imanaka, K. (2011). Athletic experience influences shoulder rotations when running through apertures. Human Movement Science, 30, 534–549. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hove, P., Riley, M. A., & Shockley, K. (2006). Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks by dynamic touch. Ecological Psychology, 18, 163–189. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1803_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. S. (2003). What is an affordance? Ecological Psychology, 15, 107–114. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keizer, A., De Bruijn, S. E. M., Smeets, M. A. M., Dijkerman, H. C., & Postma, A. (2013). Walking through apertures: Do you know what you are doing during body-scaled action? Perception, 42, 583–585. doi:10.1068/p7484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (2016). On the self-organizing origins of agency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 490–499. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolarik, A. J., Timmis, M. A., Cirstea, S., & Pardhan, S. (2014). Sensory substitution information informs locomotor adjustments when walking through apertures. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 975–984. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3809-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kording, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427, 244–247. doi:10.1038/nature02169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social and Psychological Personality Science, 8, 355–362. doi:10.1177/1948550617697177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437–459. doi:10.1068/p050437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenay, C., Gapenne, O., Hanneton, S., Marque, C., & Genouelle, C. (2003). Sensory substitution: Limits and perspectives. In Y. Hatwell, A. Streri, & E. Gentaz (Eds.), Touching for knowing: Cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception (pp. 275–292). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B. (2008). The blind climber who “sees” with his tongue. Discover, July. Retrieved September 1, 2016 from http://discovermagazine.com/2008/jul/23-the-blind-climber-who-sees-through-his-tongue
   Google Scholar
• Ludt, R., & Goodrich, G. L. (2002). Change in visual perceptual detection distances for low vision travelers as a result of dynamics visual assessment and training. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidenbaum, S., Abboud, S., & Amedi, A. (2014). Sensory substitution: Closing the gap between basic research and widespread practical visual rehabilitation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 2–15. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, L. S. (1987). Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 683–703.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, L. S., Balliet, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., & Fox, T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2, 325–366. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0204_2
   Google Scholar
• Marr, D. (1982/2010). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meese, T. S. (1995). Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: A guide based on computer simulations. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 267–281. doi:10.3758/BF03213053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oudejans, R. R. D., Michaels, C. F., Bakker, F. C., & Dolne, M. A. (1996). The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of fly balls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano, C. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Exteroception and exproprioception by dynamics touch are different functions of the inertia tensor. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1191–1202. doi:10.3758/BF03207552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves, D., Morgenstern, Y., & Wojtach, W. T. (2015). Perception and reality: Why a wholly empirical paradigm is needed to understand vision. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9(156), . doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purves, D., Wojtach, W. T., & Lotto, R. B. (2011). Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 15588–15595. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012178108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramenzoni, V. C., & Riley, M. A. (2005). Perceiving whether or not another person can use a step to reach an object. In H. Heft & K. L. Marsh (Eds.), Studies in perception and action VIII. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runeson, S., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2000). Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. Psychological Review, 107, 525–555. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutz, C., Klump, B. C., Komarczyk, L., Leighton, R., Kramer, J., Wischnewski, S., … Masuda, B. M. (2016). Discovery of species-wide tool use in the Hawaiian crow. Nature, 537, 403–407. doi:10.1038/nature19103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiecke, G., Heinzel, S., Karch, S., Ploderl, M., & Strunk, G. (2016). Synergetics in psychology: Patterns and pattern transitions in human change processes. In A. Pelster & G. Wunner (Eds.), Self-organization in complex systems: The past, present, and future of synergetics (pp. 181–208), Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, A., & Byrne, R. (2010). Animal tool-use. Current Biology, 20, R1032–R1039. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segond, H., & Weiss, D. (2005). Human spatial navigation via a visuo-tactile sensory substitution system. Perception, 34, 1231–1249. doi:10.1068/p3409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K. (2009). Heaviness or moveableness? Is perception sensitive to high-order, action-relevant physical variables? Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Galway, Ireland, October 21–24, 2009, 25, 133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Shockley, K., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2004). Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 731–742. doi:10.3758/BF03194968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15, 115–134. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A., & Bardy, B. G. (2001). On the specification of the senses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 195–261. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A., Chen, F.- C., Varlet, M., Alcantara, C., & Bardy, B. G. (2013). Getting your sea legs. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66949. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A., Mantel, B., & Bardy, B. G. (2017). The senses considered as one perceptual system. Ecological Psychology, 29, 165–197. doi:10.1080/10407413.2017.1331116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A., Pagulayan, R. J., Bardy, B. G., & Hettinger, L. J. (2000). Modulating postural control to facilitate visual performance. Human Movement Science, 19, 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00009-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A., & Riccio, G. E. (1988). An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system. Psychological Review, 95, 3–14. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 258–312). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Travieso, D., Gomez-Jordana, L., Diaz, A., Lobo, L., & Jacobs, D. M. (2015). Body-scaled affordances in sensory substitution. Consciousness and Cognition, 38, 130–138. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4, 173–187. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (2007). Action and perception at the level of synergies. Human Movement Science, 26, 657–697. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman, J. B., & Carello, C. (2001). Affordances and inertial constraints on tools use. Ecological Psychology, 13, 171–195. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1303_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman, J. B., & Hajnal, A. (2014). Task specificity and anatomical independence in perception of properties by means of a wielded object. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 2372–2391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman, J. B., & Hajnal, A. (2016). Use your head! Perception of action possibilities by means of an object attached to the head. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 829–836. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4509-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman, J. B., & Shockley, K. (2011). Metamers for hammer-with-ability are not metamers for poke-with-ability. Ecological Psychology, 23, 76–92. doi:10.1080/10407413.2011.564556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman, J. B., & Taylor, K. R. (2005). Perceiving affordances for aperture crossing for the person-plus-object system. Ecological Psychology, 17, 105–130. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E., & Nowacki, A. S. (2011). Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 192–196. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1513-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, Jr., W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 683–703.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Jr., W. H., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmut, K., & Barnett, A. L. (2011). Locomotor behavior of children while navigating through apertures. Experimental Brain Research, 210, 185–194. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2614-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar