Ecological Neuroscience: From Reduction to Proliferation of Our Resources

References

• Anderson, M. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2018). The anticipating brain is not a scientist: The free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, 195(6), 2417–2444. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1239-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 362(1485), 1585–1599. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Faiz, L., Dambrosia, J., … Hallett, M. (1997). Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature, 389(6647), 180–183. doi:10.1038/38278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (1997). The meaning of things. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 41(1), 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2004). From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: The principle of animal-environment mutuality. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2011). Against representationalism: James Gibson’s secret intellectual debt to E.B. Holt. In E. P. Charles (Ed.), A new look at new realism: The psychology and philosophy of E.B. Holt (pp. 243–261). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. The Psychological Review. 3(4), 357–370. doi:10.1037/h0070405
   Google Scholar
• De Wit, M., de Vries, S., van der Kamp, J., & Withagen, R. (2018). Affordances and neuroscience: Steps towards a successful marriage. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 622–629. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiorev.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K., & Stephan, K. E. (2007). Free-energy and the brain. Synthese, 159(3), 417–458. doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9237-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D. (2007). Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gellatly, A. (1995). Colourful Whorfian ideas: Linguistic and cultural influences on the perception and cognition of colour, and on the investigation of them. Mind & Language, 10(3), 199–225. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1995.tb00011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966a). The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception. The Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 141–149. doi:10.1080/00223980.1966.10543777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966b). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2003). Affordances, dynamic experience, and the challenge of reification. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 149–180. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2007). The social constitution of perceiver-environment reciprocity. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 85–105. doi:10.1080/10407410701331934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, B. H. (2009). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 628–652. doi:10.1075/pc.17.3.08hod.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, E. B. (1914). The concept of consciousness. London, UK: George Allen & co.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2017). Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1907/2000). Pragmatism and other writings. London, UK: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., & Singh, A. (2015). A review on Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology and its management: An update. Pharmacological Reports, 67(2), 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.pharep.2014.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(8), 4398–4403. doi:10.1073/pnas.070039597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. (1995). Pushmi-pullyu representations. Philosophical Perspectives, 9, 185–200. doi:10.2307/2214217
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2009). Symbols as constraints: The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 653–676. doi:10.1075/pc.17.3.09ras.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja, V. (2018). A theory of resonance: Towards an ecological cognitive architecture. Mind & Machines, 28(1), 29–51. doi:10.1007/s11023-017-9431-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, W. (2017). Must cognition be representational? Synthese, 194(11), 4197–4214. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0644-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. (1989). Neural regulation of adaptive behavior. Ecological Psychology, 1(1), 97–117. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0101_5
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Towards an ecological psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. S., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. doi:10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (1983). “Duality of structure” and “intentionality” in an ecological psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13(1), 19–44. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1983.tb00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szokolszky, A., & Read, C. (2018). Developmental ecological psychology and a coalition of ecological-relational developmental approaches. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 6–38. doi:10.1080/10407413.2018.1410409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. (2013). Calibrating the child for language: Meredith Williams on a Wittgensteinian approach to language socialization. Language Sciences, 40, 308–320. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wigget, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4567–4570. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811155106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Herik, J. (2018). Attentional actions—An ecological-enactive account of utterances of concrete words. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22(1), 90–123. doi:10.2478/plc-2018-0005
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L. (2016). Laying down a path in talking. Philosophical Psychology, 29(7), 993–1003. doi:10.1080/09515089.2016.1213379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., & Myin, E. (2018). Reasons for pragmatism: Affording epistemic contact in a shared environment. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–25. doi:10.1007/s11097-018-9595-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2018). Situated anticipation. Synthese, 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-02013-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25(1), 111–172. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(00)00036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S., & Katz, S. (1984). Can indirect realism be demonstrated in the psychological laboratory? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 14(2), 149–157. doi:10.1177/004839318401400202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 7780–7785. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701644104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar