Persons and Affordances

References

• Baker, L. (2005). When does a human person begin?. Social Philosophy and Policy, 22(2), 25–48. doi:10.1017/S0265052505052027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2015). Human persons as social entities. Journal of Social Ontology, 1(1), 77–87. doi:10.1515/jso-2014-0037
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2017). Naturalism and the idea of nature. Philosophy, 92(3), 333–349. doi:10.1017/S0031819117000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2004). From a critique of cognitive internalism to a conception of objective spirit: Reflections on Descombes’ Anthropological Holism. Inquiry, 47(3), 236–253. doi:10.1080/00201740410006357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2006). Kantian lessons about mind, meaning, and rationality. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44(S1), 49–71. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00030.x
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2008). Between saying and doing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2009). Reason in philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2015). From empiricism to expressivism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinck, I. (2014). Developing an understanding of social norms and games: Emotional engagement, nonverbal agreement, and conversation. Theory & Psychology, 24(6), 737–754. doi:10.1177/0959354314555792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinck, I. (2015). Understanding social norms and constitutive rules: Perspectives from developmental psychology and philosophy. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 699–718. doi:10.1007/s11097-015-9426-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 467–481. doi:10.1177/0959354395054001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. Avant, 3(2), 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• de Prado Salas, J. G., & Zamora-Bonilla, J, (In press). Rational golems: Collective agents as players in the reasoning game. In P. Stowall (Ed.), Inferentialism and collective intentionality. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• de Prado Salas, J. G., & Zamora-Bonilla, J. (2015). Collective actors without collective minds: An inferentialist approach. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 45(1), 3–25. doi:10.1177/0048393113520397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2008a). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535–543. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2008b). Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations, 11(3), 163–174. doi:10.1080/13869790802239227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2011). Interpreting embodied cognition. In W. Tschacher, & C. Bergomi (Eds.), The implications of embodiment: Cognition and communication (pp. 59–70). Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Allen, M. (2018). Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese, 195(6), 2627–2648. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1269-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2001). Perceptual learning and development: An ecological approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/mts.2001.23.2.264
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1950). The implications of learning theory for social psychology. In J. G. Miller (Ed.), Experiments in social process: A symposium on social psychology (pp. 149–167). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1967). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. In E. G. Boring, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The century psychology series. A history of psychology in autobiography, vol. 5 (pp. 127–143). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19(1), 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s Radical Empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2007). The social constitution of perceiver-environment reciprocity. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 85–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2013a). An ecological approach to psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 162–167. doi:10.1037/a0032928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2013b). Environment, cognition, and culture: Reconsidering the cognitive map. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2013c). Ecological psychology and religious meaning: Strange bedfellows?. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(2), 152–154. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2013.816341
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2017). Perceptual information of “an entirely different order”: The “cultural environment” in The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Ecological Psychology, 29(2), 122–145. doi:10.1080/10407413.2017.1297187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2018). Places: Widening the scope of an ecological approach to perception-action with an emphasis on child development. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 99–123. doi:10.1080/10407413.2018.1410045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H., Hoch, J., Edmunds, T., & Weeks, J. (2014). Can the identity of a behavior setting be perceived through patterns of joint action? An investigation of place perception. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 371–393. doi:10.3390/bs4040371
   Google Scholar
• Heras-Escribano, M., & de Pinedo-García, M. (2016). Are affordances normative?. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 565–589. doi:10.1007/s11097-015-9440-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras-Escribano, M., & de Pinedo-García, M. (2018a). Affordances and landscapes: Overcoming the nature-culture dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras-Escribano, M., & de Pinedo-García, M. (2018b). Naturalism, non-factualism, and normative situated behaviour. South African Journal of Philosophy, 37(1), 80–98. doi:10.1080/02580136.2017.1422633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohwy, J. (2016). The self-evidencing brain. Noûs, 50(2), 259–285. doi:10.1111/nous.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laland, K., Matthews, B., & Feldman, M. W. (2016). An introduction to niche-construction theory. Evolutionary Ecology, 30(2), 191–202. doi:10.1007/s10682-016-9821-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, P. (2013). Social ontology and social cognition. Abstracta, 7(1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, P. (2016a). An ecological approach to normativity. Adaptive Behavior, 24(1), 3–17. doi:10.1177/1059712315622976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, P. (2016b). Whose mind? Two interpretations of what it is to directly perceive other minds. Theory & Psychology, 26(4), 419–437. doi:10.1177/0959354316650943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, P. (In press). Conceptual confusions and causal dynamics. Phenomenology and Mind.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo, L., Heras-Escribano, M., & Travieso, D. (2018). The history and philosophy of ecological psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odling-Smee, J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, F. H. (2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 17–21. doi:10.1111/cdep.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, H., Brosche, N., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children’s understanding of the context relativity of normative rules in conventional games. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 445–456. doi:10.1348/026151008X337752
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: Young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 875–881. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, E. (1996). Encountering the world: Towards an ecological psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. (2008). Situated normativity: The normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action. Mind, 117(468), 973–1001. doi:10.1093/mind/fzn050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. (2012a). Context-switching and responsiveness to real relevance. In J. Kiverstein, & M. Wheeler (Eds.), Heidegger and Cognitive Science (pp. 105–135). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. (2012b). Bodily intentionality and social affordances in context. In F. Paglieri (Ed.), Consciousness in Interaction: The Role of the Natural and Social Context in Shaping Consciousness (pp. 207–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, K. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. doi:10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). / (2009). The concept of mind. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H. B. (2018). The subject of “We intend. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(2), 231–243. doi:10.1007/s11097-017-9501-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1990). Collective intention and action. In S. Pollack. (Eds.), Intention in communication (pp. 404–415). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science 1 (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1962). Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In R. Colodny (Ed.), Frontiers of science and philosophy (pp. 35–78). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. E., Kinsella-Shaw, J. M., & Mace, W. M. (2019). Affordance types and affordance tokens: Are Gibson’s affordances trustworthy?. Ecological Psychology, 31(1), 49–75. doi:10.1080/10407413.2018.1508353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, P. (2012). Boundless thought. The case of conceptual mental episodes. Manuscrito, 35(2), 269–309. doi:10.1590/S0100-60452012000200004
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, P. (2014). The de-localized mind. Judgements, vehicles, and persons. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 437–460. doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9309-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. (2004). Breadth and limits to the affordance concept. Ecological Psychology, 16(1), 79–85. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1601_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szokolszky, A., & Read, C. (2018). Developmental ecological psychology and a coalition of ecological-rational developmental approaches. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 6–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions. The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2017). Foregrounding sociomaterial practice in our understanding of affordances: The Skilled Intentionality Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipoli Caiani, S. (2013). Extending the notion of affordance. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 257–293. doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9295-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar