References
- Adams, E. S. (1990). Boundary disputes in the territorial ant Azteca trigona: Effects of asymmetries in colony size. Animal Behavior, 39(2), 321–328.
- Adams, E. S., & Mesterton-Gibbons, M. (2003). Lanchester’s attrition models and fights among social animals. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 719–723.
- Batchelor, T. P., & Briffa, M. (2010). Influences on resource-holding potential during dangerous group contests between wood ants. Animal Behaviour, 80(3), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.05.030
- Batchelor, T. P., Briffa, M. (2011). Fight tactics in wood ants: individual in smaller groups fight harder but dies faster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 3243–3250.
- Borges, R. M. (2002). Warring ants: Lessons from Lanchester’s laws of combat? Journal of Biosciences, 27(2), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703761
- Emlen, D. J. (2014). Animal weapons: The evolution of battle. Henry Holt and Company.
- Franks, R. N., & Partridge, L. W. (1993). Lanchester battles and the evolution of combat in ants. Animal Behaviour, 45(1), 197–199. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1021
- Franks, R. N., & Partridge, L. W. (1994). Lanchester’s theory of combat, self-organization, and the evolution of army ants and cellular societies. In L. Real (Ed.), Behavioral mechanisms of evolutionary ecology (pp. 390–408). Chicago University Press.
- Johnson, D. D. P., & MacKay, N. J. (2015). Fight the power: Lanchester's laws of combat in human evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.001
- Lanchester, F. W. (1916). Aircraft in warfare. Constable and Company Limited.
- McComb, K., Packer, C., and., & Pusey, A. (1994). Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Animal Behavior, 47, 79–387.
- McGlynn, T. P. (1999). Non-native ants are smaller than related native ants. The American Naturalist, 154(6), 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1086/303270
- McGlynn, T. P. (2000). Do Lanchester’s laws of combat describe competition in ants? Behavioral Ecology, 11(6), 686–690.
- Plavcan, J. M., van Schaik, C. P., & Kappeler, P. M. (1995). Competition, coalitions and canine size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 28(3), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1995.1019
- Plowes, N. J. R., Adams, E. S. (2005). An empirical test of Lanchester’s square law: mortality during battles of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1809–1814.
- Shelley, E. L., Tanaka, M. Y. U., Ratnathicam, A. R., & Blumstein, D. T. (2004). Can Lanchester's laws help explain interspecific dominance in birds? The Condor, 106(2), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.2.395
- Tanner, C. J. (2006). Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: A team- fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 2737–2742. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3626
- Whitehouse, M. E. A., & Jaffe, K. (1996). Ant wars: Combat strategies, territory and nest defense in the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata. Animal Behaviour, 51(6), 1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0126
- Wilson, M. L., Britton, N. F., Franks, N. R. (2002). Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 1107–1112.