On preconditioned BiCGSTAB solver for MLPG method applied to heat conduction in complex geometry

References

• R. A. Gingold and J. J. Monaghan, “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics theory and application to non-spherical statrs,” Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., vol. 181, pp. 375–389, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Nayroles, G. Touzot, and P. Villon, “Generalizing the finite element method: Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements,” Comput. Mech., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 307–318, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• T. Belytschko, Y. Y. Lu, and L. Gu, “Element-free galerkin methods,” Int. J. Numerical Methods. Eng., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 229–256, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Garg, H. C. Thakur, and B. Tripathi, “A review of applications of meshfree methods in the area of heat transfer and fluid flow : MLPG method in particular,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 329–338, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• S. N. Atluri and T. Zhu, “A new meshless local petrov-galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics,” Comput. Mech., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. N. Atluri and T. L. Zhu, “A new MLPG approach to nonlinear problems in computer modeling and simulation,” Comput. Model. Simul. Eng., vol. 3. pp. 187–196, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• S. N. Atluri, H. G. Kim, and J. Y. Cho, “Critical assessment of the truly meshless local petrov-galerkin (MLPG), and local boundary integral equation (LBIE) methods,” Comput. Mech., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 348–372, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. Liew, X. Zhao, and A. J. M. Ferreira, “A review of meshless methods for laminated and functionally graded plates and shells,” Compos. Struct., vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 2031–2041, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Sladek, P. Stanak, Z. D. Han, V. Sladek, and S. N. Atluri, “Applications of the MLPG method in engineering & sciences: A review,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 423–475, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Benzi, “Preconditioning techniques for large linear systems: A survey,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 418–477, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. W. Peaceman and H. H. Rachford, Jr., “The numerical solution of parabolic and elliptic differential equations,” Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–41, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• G. H. Golub and D. P. O’Leary, “Some history of the conjugate gradient and lanczos algorithms: 1948-1976,” SIAM Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 50–102, 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. Hestenes and E. Stiefel, “Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems,” J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 409–436, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders, “Solution of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 617–629, 1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Concus, G. H. Golub, and D. P. O’ Leary, “A generalized conjugate gradient method for the numerical solution of elliptic partical differential equations,” Academic Press., vol. 24, pp. 309–332, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Saad and M. H. Schultz, “GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 856–869, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. A. Van der Vorst, “Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of bi-cg for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 631–644, 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Brandt, “Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary-value problems,” Math. Comput., vol. 31, no. 138, pp. 333–390, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. Evans, “The use of pre-conditioning in iterative methods for,” J. Inst. Maths Applics., vol. 4, pp. 295–314, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• J. A. Meijerink and H. A. van der Vorst, “An iterative solution method for linear systems of which the coefficient matrix is a symmetric M-matrix,” Math. Comput., vol. 31, no. 137, pp. 148–148, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. I. Yang and R. Mittal, “Acceleration of the Jacobi iterative method by factors exceeding 100 using scheduled relaxation,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 274, pp. 695–708, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. Adsuara, I. Cordero-Carrión, P. Cerdá-Durán, and M. A. Aloy, “Scheduled relaxation jacobi method: Improvements and applications,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 321, pp. 369–413, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Thakur, K. M. Singh, and P. K. Sahoo, “Meshless local petrov-galerkin method for nonlinear heat conduction problems,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B Fundam., vol. 56, no. 5, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids. London: Oxford University Press, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sterk and R. Trobec, “Meshless solution of a diffusion equation with parameter optimization and error analysis,” Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 567–577, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar